6502/6502bench
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fadden/6502bench.git synced 2024-11-18 15:06:07 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
1844fcb8b7
6502bench/Asm65/CpuDef.cs

1227 lines
50 KiB
C#
Raw Normal View History

Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
/*
* Copyright 2018 faddenSoft
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
Rough prototype of split-address table formatter
2018-10-06 05:14:38 +00:00
using System;
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
using System.Diagnostics;
namespace Asm65 {
/// <summary>
/// CPU definition. Includes a set of 256 opcodes.
/// </summary>
public class CpuDef {
/// <summary>
/// Human-readable name.
/// </summary>
public string Name { get; private set; }
/// <summary>
/// Maximum possible address.
/// </summary>
public int MaxAddressValue { get; private set; }
/// <summary>
/// Does this CPU have a 16-bit address space?
/// </summary>
public bool HasAddr16 { get { return MaxAddressValue <= 0xffff; } }
/// <summary>
/// Does this CPU support the emulation flag (65802/65816)?
/// </summary>
public bool HasEmuFlag { get; private set; }
/// <summary>
/// CPU type value.
/// </summary>
public CpuType Type { get; private set; }
/// <summary>
/// True if undocumented opcodes are included. (This does not mean that the CPU has
/// undocumented opcodes, only that they haven't been stripped out if they exist.)
/// </summary>
public bool HasUndocumented { get; private set; }
/// <summary>
/// Instruction set, 256 entries.
/// </summary>
private OpDef[] mOpDefs;
/// <summary>
/// Cycle counts, 256 entries.
/// </summary>
private int[] mCycleCounts;
/// <summary>
/// Cycle count modifiers, 256 entries.
/// </summary>
private OpDef.CycleMod[] mCycleMods;
/// <summary>
/// List of "interesting" CPUs. These will be presented in the system definition
/// file when starting a new project. The actual set of CPUs that are unique (from
/// our perspective) is much smaller, as most of these can be represented accurately
/// (for disassembly purposes) by a handful of archetypes.
/// </summary>
public enum CpuType {
CpuUnknown = 0,
Cpu6502, // Apple ][+
Cpu6502B, // Atari 800
Cpu6507, // Atari 2600
Cpu6502C, // Atari 5200
Cpu6510, // Commodore 64
Cpu8502, // Commodore 128
Cpu2A03, // NES
Add Atari Lynx placeholder and 65SC02 definition
2018-10-02 20:18:45 +00:00
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
Cpu65C02, // Apple //e
Add Atari Lynx placeholder and 65SC02 definition
2018-10-02 20:18:45 +00:00
Cpu65SC02, // Atari Lynx
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
Cpu65802, // ?
Cpu65816, // Apple IIgs
Cpu5A22 // SNES
}
/// <summary>
/// Converts a CPU type name string to a CpuType value. Used for deserialization.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="name">Case-sensitive CPU name</param>
/// <returns>CpuType value, or CpuUnknown if name wasn't recognized.</returns>
public static CpuType GetCpuTypeFromName(string name) {
switch (name) {
case "6502": return CpuType.Cpu6502;
case "6502B": return CpuType.Cpu6502B;
case "6502C": return CpuType.Cpu6502C;
case "6507": return CpuType.Cpu6507;
case "6510": return CpuType.Cpu6510;
case "8502": return CpuType.Cpu8502;
case "2A03": return CpuType.Cpu2A03;
case "65C02": return CpuType.Cpu65C02;
Add Atari Lynx placeholder and 65SC02 definition
2018-10-02 20:18:45 +00:00
case "65SC02": return CpuType.Cpu65SC02;
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
case "65802": return CpuType.Cpu65802;
case "65816": return CpuType.Cpu65816;
case "5A22": return CpuType.Cpu5A22;
default:
return CpuType.CpuUnknown;
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Converts a CpuType value to a CPU type name string. Used for serialization.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="type">CPU type.</param>
/// <returns>CPU name string.</returns>
public static string GetCpuNameFromType(CpuType type) {
switch (type) {
case CpuType.Cpu6502: return "6502";
case CpuType.Cpu6502B: return "6502B";
case CpuType.Cpu6502C: return "6502C";
case CpuType.Cpu6507: return "6507";
case CpuType.Cpu6510: return "6510";
case CpuType.Cpu8502: return "8502";
case CpuType.Cpu2A03: return "2A03";
case CpuType.Cpu65C02: return "65C02";
Add Atari Lynx placeholder and 65SC02 definition
2018-10-02 20:18:45 +00:00
case CpuType.Cpu65SC02: return "65SC02";
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
case CpuType.Cpu65802: return "65802";
case CpuType.Cpu65816: return "65816";
case CpuType.Cpu5A22: return "5A22";
default:
return "65??";
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Generates a CpuDef that best matches the parameters.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="type">Specific CPU we want.</param>
/// <param name="includeUndocumented">Set to true if "undocumented" opcodes should
/// be included in the definition.</param>
/// <returns>Best CpuDef.</returns>
Optionally treat BRKs as two-byte instructions Early data sheets listed BRK as one byte, but RTI after a BRK skips the following byte, effectively making BRK a 2-byte instruction. Sometimes, such as when diassembling Apple /// SOS code, it's handy to treat it that way explicitly. This change makes two-byte BRKs optional, controlled by a checkbox in the project settings. In the system definitions it defaults to true for Apple ///, false for all others. ACME doesn't allow BRK to have an arg, and cc65 only allows it for 65816 code (?), so it's emitted as a hex blob for those assemblers. Anyone wishing to target those assemblers should stick to 1-byte mode. Extension scripts have to switch between formatting one byte of inline data and formatting an instruction with a one-byte operand. A helper function has been added to the plugin Util class. To get some regression test coverage, 2022-extension-scripts has been configured to use two-byte BRK. Also, added/corrected some SOS constants. See also issue #44.
2019-10-09 21:55:56 +00:00
public static CpuDef GetBestMatch(CpuType type, bool includeUndocumented,
bool twoByteBrk) {
Add Atari Lynx placeholder and 65SC02 definition
2018-10-02 20:18:45 +00:00
// Many 65xx variants boil down to a 6502, 65C02, or 65816, at least as far as
// a disassembler needs to know. These do not, and would need full definitions:
//
// Hudson Soft HuC6280 (PC Engine / TurboGrafx)
// Commodore CSG 4510 / CSG 65CE02 (Amiga A2232 serial port; 4510 has one
// additional instruction, so use that as archetype)
// Rockwell R65C02 (used in ???)
// Jeri's 65DTV02 (used in C64DTV single-chip computer); same as 6502 with
// some differences in illegal opcodes
// Eloraam 65EL02 (defined in a Minecraft-based emulator)
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
CpuDef cpuDef;
switch (type) {
case CpuType.Cpu65802:
case CpuType.Cpu65816:
case CpuType.Cpu5A22:
cpuDef = Cpu65816;
break;
case CpuType.Cpu65C02:
Add Atari Lynx placeholder and 65SC02 definition
2018-10-02 20:18:45 +00:00
case CpuType.Cpu65SC02:
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
cpuDef = Cpu65C02;
break;
default:
Add instruction chart This adds a window that displays all of the instructions for a given CPU in a summary grid. Undocumented instructions are included, but shown in grey italics. Also, tweaked AppSettings to not mark itself as dirty if a "set" operation doesn't actually change anything.
2019-10-21 22:15:09 +00:00
// 6502, 6502B, 6502C, 6507, 6510, 8502, 2A03
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
cpuDef = Cpu6502;
break;
}
cpuDef.GenerateCycleCounts();
// If we don't want undocumented opcodes, strip them out of the definition.
// Entries are replaced with OpInvalid.
if (!includeUndocumented) {
CpuDef stripped = new CpuDef(cpuDef);
for (int i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
if (cpuDef.mOpDefs[i].IsUndocumented) {
stripped.mOpDefs[i] = OpDef.OpInvalid;
} else {
stripped.mOpDefs[i] = cpuDef.mOpDefs[i];
}
}
cpuDef = stripped;
}
Optionally treat BRKs as two-byte instructions Early data sheets listed BRK as one byte, but RTI after a BRK skips the following byte, effectively making BRK a 2-byte instruction. Sometimes, such as when diassembling Apple /// SOS code, it's handy to treat it that way explicitly. This change makes two-byte BRKs optional, controlled by a checkbox in the project settings. In the system definitions it defaults to true for Apple ///, false for all others. ACME doesn't allow BRK to have an arg, and cc65 only allows it for 65816 code (?), so it's emitted as a hex blob for those assemblers. Anyone wishing to target those assemblers should stick to 1-byte mode. Extension scripts have to switch between formatting one byte of inline data and formatting an instruction with a one-byte operand. A helper function has been added to the plugin Util class. To get some regression test coverage, 2022-extension-scripts has been configured to use two-byte BRK. Also, added/corrected some SOS constants. See also issue #44.
2019-10-09 21:55:56 +00:00
// If we want two-byte BRKs, replace the entry with the StackInt form. Copy the rest.
if (twoByteBrk) {
CpuDef bigBrkDef = new CpuDef(cpuDef);
bigBrkDef.mOpDefs[0] = OpDef.OpBRK_StackInt;
for (int i = 1; i < 256; i++) {
bigBrkDef.mOpDefs[i] = cpuDef.mOpDefs[i];
}
cpuDef = bigBrkDef;
}
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
cpuDef.HasUndocumented = includeUndocumented;
return cpuDef;
}
/// <summary>
/// Constructor.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="name">Human-readable name.</param>
/// <param name="maxAddressValue">Address space bits (16 or 24).</param>
private CpuDef(string name, int maxAddressValue, bool hasEmuFlag) {
Name = name;
MaxAddressValue = maxAddressValue;
HasEmuFlag = hasEmuFlag;
HasUndocumented = true;
}
/// <summary>
/// Copy constructor. Does not copy the contents of mOpDefs. Only used internally.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="src">Object to copy from.</param>
private CpuDef(CpuDef src) {
Name = src.Name;
MaxAddressValue = src.MaxAddressValue;
HasEmuFlag = src.HasEmuFlag;
Type = src.Type;
mCycleCounts = src.mCycleCounts;
mCycleMods = src.mCycleMods;
mOpDefs = new OpDef[256];
}
/// <summary>
Add instruction chart This adds a window that displays all of the instructions for a given CPU in a summary grid. Undocumented instructions are included, but shown in grey italics. Also, tweaked AppSettings to not mark itself as dirty if a "set" operation doesn't actually change anything.
2019-10-21 22:15:09 +00:00
/// Returns an entry from the OpDef array for the specified opcode, 0-255.
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
/// </summary>
Remap labels that use opcode mnemonics In a recent survey, three out of four cross assemblers surveyed recommended not using opcode mnemonics to their patients who use labels. We now remap labels like "AND" and "jmp", using the label map that's part of the label localizer. We skip the step for Merlin 32, which is perfectly happy to assemble "JMP JMP JMP". Also, fixed a bug in MaskLeadingUnderscores that could hang the source generator thread.
2019-09-20 22:29:34 +00:00
/// <param name="op">Instruction opcode number (0-255).</param>
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
/// <returns>Instruction definition.</returns>
public OpDef GetOpDef(int op) { return mOpDefs[op]; }
Fix display of instruction attributes The "affected flags" constants were incorrect for BIT, BRK, COP, RTI, XCE, and the undocmented instructions ANE, DCP, and SAX. The constants are used for the changed-flag summary shown in the info window and the instruction chart. Of greater import: the status flag updater for BIT was incorrectly marking N/V/C as indeterminate instead of N/V/Z. The undocmented instructions ANE, DCP, and SAX were also incorrect. The cycle counts shown in line comments are computed correctly, but the counts shown in the info window and instruction chart were displaying the full set of modifiers, ignoring the CPU type. That's okay for the info window, which spells the modifiers out, though it'd be better if the bits were explicitly marked as being applicable to the current CPU or a different one.
2019-10-22 16:58:23 +00:00
/// <summary>
/// Returns the set of cycle mods for the given instruction that are in effect
/// for the current CPU.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="op">Instruction opcode number (0-255).</param>
/// <returns>Reduced cycle mod set.</returns>
public OpDef.CycleMod GetOpCycleMod(int op) { return mCycleMods[op]; }
Add instruction chart This adds a window that displays all of the instructions for a given CPU in a summary grid. Undocumented instructions are included, but shown in grey italics. Also, tweaked AppSettings to not mark itself as dirty if a "set" operation doesn't actually change anything.
2019-10-21 22:15:09 +00:00
/// <summary>
/// Indexer. Returns the definition of opcode N.
/// </summary>
public OpDef this[int op] {
get { return mOpDefs[op]; }
}
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
/// <summary>
/// Returns the number of cycles required to execute the instruction. If the value
/// is negative, the negated value represents the minimum number of cycles for an
/// instruction with variable timing.
///
/// The value returned will factor in any CPU-specific aspects.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="opNum">Instruction opcode value.</param>
/// <returns>Cycle count.</returns>
public int GetCycles(int opNum, StatusFlags flags, OpDef.BranchTaken branchTaken,
bool branchCrossesPage) {
Add 2020-cycle-counts A quick test to confirm that the cycle counting mechanism is generating the correct results.
2019-09-15 01:51:03 +00:00
// The irrelevant modifiers have already been stripped out, e.g. OneIfD1 only
// affects the 65C02.
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.CycleMod mods = mCycleMods[opNum];
int cycles = mCycleCounts[opNum];
// Walk through the various cycle mods. If we can evaluate them definitively,
// do so now and remove them from the set.
// The M/X flags are defined to be in one state or the other, even when the flag
// value is indeterminate, because we have to be able to size immediate operands
// appropriately. So there's no ambiguity here even when there's ambiguity. We
// make a similar statement about the E flag.
if ((mods & OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfM0) != 0) {
if (!flags.ShortM) {
cycles++;
}
mods &= ~OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfM0;
}
if ((mods & OpDef.CycleMod.TwoIfM0) != 0) {
if (!flags.ShortM) {
cycles += 2;
}
mods &= ~OpDef.CycleMod.TwoIfM0;
}
if ((mods & OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfX0) != 0) {
if (!flags.ShortX) {
cycles++;
}
mods &= ~OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfX0;
}
if ((mods & OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfE0) != 0) {
if (flags.E == 0) {
cycles++;
}
mods &= ~OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfE0;
}
// Some of these can be known, some can't.
if ((mods & OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfD1) != 0) {
if (flags.D == 1) {
cycles++;
}
if (flags.D == 0 || flags.D == 1) {
mods &= ~OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfD1;
}
}
if ((mods & OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfBranchTaken) != 0) {
if (branchTaken == OpDef.BranchTaken.Always) {
cycles++;
}
if (branchTaken != OpDef.BranchTaken.Indeterminate) {
mods &= ~OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfBranchTaken;
}
}
if ((mods & OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfBranchPage) != 0) {
if (branchCrossesPage && flags.E != 0) {
cycles++; // +1 unless we're in native mode on 65816
}
mods &= ~OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfBranchPage;
}
// We can't evaluate OneIfDpNonzero, OneIfIndexPage, or MinusOneIfNoPage.
// OneIf65C02 was handled earlier.
// TODO(maybe): in some cases we can know that the index doesn't cross a
// page boundary by checking the address, e.g. "LDA $2000,X" can't cross.
if (mods != 0) {
// Some unresolved mods remain.
cycles = -cycles;
}
return cycles;
}
/// <summary>
/// Consistency test.
/// </summary>
/// <returns>True on success.</returns>
public static bool DebugValidate() {
InternalValidate(Cpu6502);
InternalValidate(Cpu65C02);
InternalValidate(Cpu65816);
Debug.WriteLine("CpuDefs okay");
return true;
}
private static void InternalValidate(CpuDef cdef) {
for (int i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
OpDef op = cdef.mOpDefs[i];
if (op.Opcode != i && op.AddrMode != OpDef.AddressMode.Unknown) {
throw new Exception("CpuDef for " + cdef.Type + ": entry 0x" +
i.ToString("x") + " has value " + op.Opcode.ToString("x"));
}
if (op.AddrMode != OpDef.AddressMode.Unknown && op.Cycles == 0) {
throw new Exception("Instruction 0x" + i.ToString("x2") + ": " +
op + " missing cycles");
}
}
}
public override string ToString() {
Show a wait cursor when refreshing larger projects Fiddled with the status bar, but that'll probably require async.
2019-07-19 18:41:18 +00:00
return Name + " (has16=" + HasAddr16 + ", hasEmu=" + HasEmuFlag + ", hasUndoc=" +
HasUndocumented + ")";
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
}
/// <summary>
/// Generates the mCycleCounts and mCycleMods arrays.
/// </summary>
private void GenerateCycleCounts() {
if (mCycleCounts != null) {
return;
}
mCycleCounts = new int[256];
mCycleMods = new OpDef.CycleMod[256];
// Figure out which mods apply for this CPU.
OpDef.CycleMod ignoreMask = 0;
switch (Type) {
case CpuType.Cpu6502:
ignoreMask = OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfM0 |
OpDef.CycleMod.TwoIfM0 |
OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfX0 |
OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfDpNonzero |
OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfD1 |
OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfE0 |
OpDef.CycleMod.OneIf65C02 |
OpDef.CycleMod.MinusOneIfNoPage |
OpDef.CycleMod.BlockMove;
break;
case CpuType.Cpu65C02:
ignoreMask = OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfM0 |
OpDef.CycleMod.TwoIfM0 |
OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfX0 |
OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfDpNonzero |
OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfE0 |
OpDef.CycleMod.BlockMove;
break;
case CpuType.Cpu65816:
ignoreMask = OpDef.CycleMod.OneIfD1 |
OpDef.CycleMod.OneIf65C02 |
OpDef.CycleMod.MinusOneIfNoPage;
break;
default:
Debug.Assert(false, "unsupported cpu type " + Type);
return;
}
// If an instruction has one or more applicable mods, declare it as variable.
for (int i = 0; i < 256; i++) {
OpDef op = mOpDefs[i];
int baseCycles = op.Cycles;
OpDef.CycleMod mods = op.CycleMods & ~ignoreMask;
if ((mods & OpDef.CycleMod.OneIf65C02) != 0) {
// This isn't variable -- the instruction always takes one cycle longer
// on the 65C02. (Applies to $6C, JMP (addr).)
Debug.Assert(Type == CpuType.Cpu65C02);
baseCycles++;
mods &= ~OpDef.CycleMod.OneIf65C02;
}
mCycleCounts[i] = baseCycles;
mCycleMods[i] = mods;
}
}
// Classic MOS 6502, with full set of undocumented opcodes.
private static CpuDef Cpu6502 { get; } = new CpuDef("MOS 6502", (1 << 16) - 1, false) {
Type = CpuType.Cpu6502,
mOpDefs = new OpDef[] {
Treat BRK as a 1-byte instruction The 65816 definition makes it a two-byte instruction, like COP. On the 6502 it acted like a two-byte instruction, but in practice very few assemblers treat it that way. Very few humans, for that matter. So it's now treated as a single byte instruction, with the following byte encoded as a data value.
2019-08-03 00:21:50 +00:00
OpDef.OpBRK_Implied, // 0x00
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpORA_DPIndexXInd,
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x02, OpDef.OpJAM_Implied),
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpSLO_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x04, OpDef.OpDOP_DP),
OpDef.OpORA_DP,
OpDef.OpASL_DP,
OpDef.OpSLO_DP,
OpDef.OpPHP_StackPush, // 0x08
OpDef.OpORA_Imm,
OpDef.OpASL_Acc,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x0b, OpDef.OpANC_Imm),
OpDef.OpTOP_Abs,
OpDef.OpORA_Abs,
OpDef.OpASL_Abs,
OpDef.OpSLO_Absolute,
OpDef.OpBPL_PCRel, // 0x10
OpDef.OpORA_DPIndIndexY,
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x12, OpDef.OpJAM_Implied),
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpSLO_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x14, OpDef.OpDOP_DPIndexX),
OpDef.OpORA_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpASL_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpSLO_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpCLC_Implied, // 0x18
OpDef.OpORA_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x1a, OpDef.OpNOP_Implied),
OpDef.OpSLO_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x1c, OpDef.OpTOP_AbsIndeX),
OpDef.OpORA_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpASL_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpSLO_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpJSR_Abs, // 0x20
OpDef.OpAND_DPIndexXInd,
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x22, OpDef.OpJAM_Implied),
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpRLA_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.OpBIT_DP,
OpDef.OpAND_DP,
OpDef.OpROL_DP,
OpDef.OpRLA_DP,
OpDef.OpPLP_StackPull, // 0x28
OpDef.OpAND_Imm,
OpDef.OpROL_Acc,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x2b, OpDef.OpANC_Imm),
OpDef.OpBIT_Abs,
OpDef.OpAND_Abs,
OpDef.OpROL_Abs,
OpDef.OpRLA_Absolute,
OpDef.OpBMI_PCRel, // 0x30
OpDef.OpAND_DPIndIndexY,
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x32, OpDef.OpJAM_Implied),
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpRLA_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x34, OpDef.OpDOP_DPIndexX),
OpDef.OpAND_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpROL_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpRLA_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpSEC_Implied, // 0x38
OpDef.OpAND_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x3a, OpDef.OpNOP_Implied),
OpDef.OpRLA_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x3c, OpDef.OpTOP_AbsIndeX),
OpDef.OpAND_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpROL_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpRLA_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpRTI_StackRTI, // 0x40
OpDef.OpEOR_DPIndexXInd,
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x42, OpDef.OpJAM_Implied),
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpSRE_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x44, OpDef.OpDOP_DP),
OpDef.OpEOR_DP,
OpDef.OpLSR_DP,
OpDef.OpSRE_DP,
OpDef.OpPHA_StackPush, // 0x48
OpDef.OpEOR_Imm,
OpDef.OpLSR_Acc,
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.OpALR_Imm,
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpJMP_Abs,
OpDef.OpEOR_Abs,
OpDef.OpLSR_Abs,
OpDef.OpSRE_Absolute,
OpDef.OpBVC_PCRel, // 0x50
OpDef.OpEOR_DPIndIndexY,
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x52, OpDef.OpJAM_Implied),
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpSRE_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x54, OpDef.OpDOP_DPIndexX),
OpDef.OpEOR_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpLSR_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpSRE_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpCLI_Implied, // 0x58
OpDef.OpEOR_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x5a, OpDef.OpNOP_Implied),
OpDef.OpSRE_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x5c, OpDef.OpTOP_AbsIndeX),
OpDef.OpEOR_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpLSR_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpSRE_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpRTS_StackRTS, // 0x60
OpDef.OpADC_DPIndexXInd,
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x62, OpDef.OpJAM_Implied),
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpRRA_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x64, OpDef.OpDOP_DP),
OpDef.OpADC_DP,
OpDef.OpROR_DP,
OpDef.OpRRA_DP,
OpDef.OpPLA_StackPull, // 0x68
OpDef.OpADC_Imm,
OpDef.OpROR_Acc,
OpDef.OpARR_Imm,
OpDef.OpJMP_AbsInd,
OpDef.OpADC_Abs,
OpDef.OpROR_Abs,
OpDef.OpRRA_Absolute,
OpDef.OpBVS_PCRel, // 0x70
OpDef.OpADC_DPIndIndexY,
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x72, OpDef.OpJAM_Implied),
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpRRA_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x74, OpDef.OpDOP_DPIndexX),
OpDef.OpADC_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpROR_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpRRA_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpSEI_Implied, // 0x78
OpDef.OpADC_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x7a, OpDef.OpNOP_Implied),
OpDef.OpRRA_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x7c, OpDef.OpTOP_AbsIndeX),
OpDef.OpADC_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpROR_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpRRA_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x80, OpDef.OpDOP_Imm), // 0x80
OpDef.OpSTA_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x82, OpDef.OpDOP_Imm),
OpDef.OpSAX_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.OpSTY_DP,
OpDef.OpSTA_DP,
OpDef.OpSTX_DP,
OpDef.OpSAX_DP,
OpDef.OpDEY_Implied, // 0x88
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x89, OpDef.OpDOP_Imm),
OpDef.OpTXA_Implied,
OpDef.OpANE_Imm,
OpDef.OpSTY_Abs,
OpDef.OpSTA_Abs,
OpDef.OpSTX_Abs,
OpDef.OpSAX_Absolute,
OpDef.OpBCC_PCRel, // 0x90
OpDef.OpSTA_DPIndIndexY,
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x92, OpDef.OpJAM_Implied),
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpSHA_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpSTY_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpSTA_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpSTX_DPIndexY,
OpDef.OpSAX_DPIndexY,
OpDef.OpTYA_Implied, // 0x98
OpDef.OpSTA_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpTXS_Implied,
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.OpTAS_AbsIndexY,
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpSHY_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpSTA_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpSHX_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpSHA_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpLDY_Imm, // 0xa0
OpDef.OpLDA_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.OpLDX_Imm,
OpDef.OpLAX_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.OpLDY_DP,
OpDef.OpLDA_DP,
OpDef.OpLDX_DP,
OpDef.OpLAX_DP,
OpDef.OpTAY_Implied, // 0xa8
OpDef.OpLDA_Imm,
OpDef.OpTAX_Implied,
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.OpLAX_Imm,
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpLDY_Abs,
OpDef.OpLDA_Abs,
OpDef.OpLDX_Abs,
OpDef.OpLAX_Absolute,
OpDef.OpBCS_PCRel, // 0xb0
OpDef.OpLDA_DPIndIndexY,
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xb2, OpDef.OpJAM_Implied),
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpLAX_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpLDY_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpLDA_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpLDX_DPIndexY,
OpDef.OpLAX_DPIndexY,
OpDef.OpCLV_Implied, // 0xb8
OpDef.OpLDA_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpTSX_Implied,
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.OpLAS_AbsIndexY,
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpLDY_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpLDA_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpLDX_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpLAX_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpCPY_Imm, // 0xc0
OpDef.OpCMP_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xc2, OpDef.OpDOP_Imm),
OpDef.OpDCP_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.OpCPY_DP,
OpDef.OpCMP_DP,
OpDef.OpDEC_DP,
OpDef.OpDCP_DP,
OpDef.OpINY_Implied, // 0xc8
OpDef.OpCMP_Imm,
OpDef.OpDEX_Implied,
OpDef.OpSBX_Imm,
OpDef.OpCPY_Abs,
OpDef.OpCMP_Abs,
OpDef.OpDEC_Abs,
OpDef.OpDCP_Abs,
OpDef.OpBNE_PCRel, // 0xd0
OpDef.OpCMP_DPIndIndexY,
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xd2, OpDef.OpJAM_Implied),
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpDCP_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xd4, OpDef.OpDOP_DPIndexX),
OpDef.OpCMP_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpDEC_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpDCP_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpCLD_Implied, // 0xd8
OpDef.OpCMP_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xda, OpDef.OpNOP_Implied),
OpDef.OpDCP_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xdc, OpDef.OpTOP_AbsIndeX),
OpDef.OpCMP_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpDEC_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpDCP_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpCPX_Imm, // 0xe0
OpDef.OpSBC_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xe2, OpDef.OpDOP_Imm),
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.OpISC_DPIndexXInd,
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpCPX_DP,
OpDef.OpSBC_DP,
OpDef.OpINC_DP,
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.OpISC_DP,
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpINX_Implied, // 0xe8
OpDef.OpSBC_Imm,
OpDef.OpNOP_Implied,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xeb, OpDef.OpSBC_Imm),
OpDef.OpCPX_Abs,
OpDef.OpSBC_Abs,
OpDef.OpINC_Abs,
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.OpISC_Abs,
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpBEQ_PCRel, // 0xf0
OpDef.OpSBC_DPIndIndexY,
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xf2, OpDef.OpJAM_Implied),
OpDef.OpISC_DPIndIndexY,
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xf4, OpDef.OpDOP_DPIndexX),
OpDef.OpSBC_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpINC_DPIndexX,
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.OpISC_DPIndexX,
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpSED_Implied, // 0xf8
OpDef.OpSBC_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xfa, OpDef.OpNOP_Implied),
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.OpISC_AbsIndexY,
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xfc, OpDef.OpTOP_AbsIndeX),
OpDef.OpSBC_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpINC_AbsIndexX,
Rename undocumented 6502 opcodes to match Unintended Opcodes doc These *almost* match what cc65 has, and are accepted as primary or aliases by 64tass. This combines the LAX and LXA operations. LXA is the immediate form of LAX, and behaves somewhat differently (and is unstable). I was treating them as two separate operations with independent mnemonics, but that doesn't seem to be the preferred way to handle it. The cc65 generator wasn't generating LAX before; now it does. This required nudging the width disambiguator, as LAX is a second example of an instruction with both DP,Y and ABS,Y operands. (issue #20)
2018-10-05 21:07:57 +00:00
OpDef.OpISC_AbsIndexX,
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
}
};
// WDC's 65C02, with new opcodes and a handful of slightly strange NOPs.
private static CpuDef Cpu65C02 { get; } = new CpuDef("WDC W65C02S", (1 << 16) - 1, false) {
Type = CpuType.Cpu65C02,
mOpDefs = new OpDef[] {
Treat BRK as a 1-byte instruction The 65816 definition makes it a two-byte instruction, like COP. On the 6502 it acted like a two-byte instruction, but in practice very few assemblers treat it that way. Very few humans, for that matter. So it's now treated as a single byte instruction, with the following byte encoded as a data value.
2019-08-03 00:21:50 +00:00
OpDef.OpBRK_Implied, // 0x00
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpORA_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x02, OpDef.OpLDD_Imm),
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x03, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpTSB_DP,
OpDef.OpORA_DP,
OpDef.OpASL_DP,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x07, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpPHP_StackPush, // 0x08
OpDef.OpORA_Imm,
OpDef.OpASL_Acc,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x0b, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpTSB_Abs,
OpDef.OpORA_Abs,
OpDef.OpASL_Abs,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x0f, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpBPL_PCRel, // 0x10
OpDef.OpORA_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpORA_DPInd,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x13, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpTRB_DP,
OpDef.OpORA_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpASL_DPIndexX,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x17, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpCLC_Implied, // 0x18
OpDef.OpORA_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpINC_Acc,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x1b, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpTRB_Abs,
OpDef.OpORA_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpASL_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x1f, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpJSR_Abs, // 0x20
OpDef.OpAND_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x22, OpDef.OpLDD_Imm),
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x23, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpBIT_DP,
OpDef.OpAND_DP,
OpDef.OpROL_DP,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x27, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpPLP_StackPull, // 0x28
OpDef.OpAND_Imm,
OpDef.OpROL_Acc,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x2b, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpBIT_Abs,
OpDef.OpAND_Abs,
OpDef.OpROL_Abs,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x2f, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpBMI_PCRel, // 0x30
OpDef.OpAND_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpAND_DPInd,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x33, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpBIT_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpAND_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpROL_DPIndexX,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x37, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpSEC_Implied, // 0x38
OpDef.OpAND_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpDEC_Acc,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x3b, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpBIT_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpAND_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpROL_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x3f, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpRTI_StackRTI, // 0x40
OpDef.OpEOR_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x42, OpDef.OpLDD_Imm),
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x43, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x44, OpDef.OpLDD_DP),
OpDef.OpEOR_DP,
OpDef.OpLSR_DP,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x47, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpPHA_StackPush, // 0x48
OpDef.OpEOR_Imm,
OpDef.OpLSR_Acc,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x4b, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpJMP_Abs,
OpDef.OpEOR_Abs,
OpDef.OpLSR_Abs,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x4f, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpBVC_PCRel, // 0x50
OpDef.OpEOR_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpEOR_DPInd,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x53, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x54, OpDef.OpLDD_DPIndexX),
OpDef.OpEOR_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpLSR_DPIndexX,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x57, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpCLI_Implied, // 0x58
OpDef.OpEOR_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpPHY_StackPush,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x5b, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x5c, OpDef.OpLDD_Weird),
OpDef.OpEOR_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpLSR_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x5f, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpRTS_StackRTS, // 0x60
OpDef.OpADC_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x62, OpDef.OpLDD_Imm),
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x63, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpSTZ_DP,
OpDef.OpADC_DP,
OpDef.OpROR_DP,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x67, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpPLA_StackPull, // 0x68
OpDef.OpADC_Imm,
OpDef.OpROR_Acc,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x6b, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpJMP_AbsInd,
OpDef.OpADC_Abs,
OpDef.OpROR_Abs,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x6f, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpBVS_PCRel, // 0x70
OpDef.OpADC_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpADC_DPInd,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x73, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpSTZ_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpADC_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpROR_DPIndexX,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x77, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpSEI_Implied, // 0x78
OpDef.OpADC_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpPLY_StackPull,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x7b, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpJMP_AbsIndexXInd,
OpDef.OpADC_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpROR_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x7f, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpBRA_PCRel, // 0x80
OpDef.OpSTA_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x82, OpDef.OpLDD_Imm),
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x83, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpSTY_DP,
OpDef.OpSTA_DP,
OpDef.OpSTX_DP,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x87, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpDEY_Implied, // 0x88
OpDef.OpBIT_Imm,
OpDef.OpTXA_Implied,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x8b, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpSTY_Abs,
OpDef.OpSTA_Abs,
OpDef.OpSTX_Abs,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x8f, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpBCC_PCRel, // 0x90
OpDef.OpSTA_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpSTA_DPInd,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x93, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpSTY_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpSTA_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpSTX_DPIndexY,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x97, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpTYA_Implied, // 0x98
OpDef.OpSTA_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpTXS_Implied,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x9b, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpSTZ_Abs,
OpDef.OpSTA_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpSTZ_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0x9f, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpLDY_Imm, // 0xa0
OpDef.OpLDA_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.OpLDX_Imm,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xa3, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpLDY_DP,
OpDef.OpLDA_DP,
OpDef.OpLDX_DP,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xa7, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpTAY_Implied, // 0xa8
OpDef.OpLDA_Imm,
OpDef.OpTAX_Implied,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xab, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpLDY_Abs,
OpDef.OpLDA_Abs,
OpDef.OpLDX_Abs,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xaf, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpBCS_PCRel, // 0xb0
OpDef.OpLDA_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpLDA_DPInd,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xb3, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpLDY_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpLDA_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpLDX_DPIndexY,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xb7, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpCLV_Implied, // 0xb8
OpDef.OpLDA_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpTSX_Implied,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xbb, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpLDY_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpLDA_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpLDX_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xbf, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpCPY_Imm, // 0xc0
OpDef.OpCMP_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xc2, OpDef.OpLDD_Imm),
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xc3, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpCPY_DP,
OpDef.OpCMP_DP,
OpDef.OpDEC_DP,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xc7, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpINY_Implied, // 0xc8
OpDef.OpCMP_Imm,
OpDef.OpDEX_Implied,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xcb, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpCPY_Abs,
OpDef.OpCMP_Abs,
OpDef.OpDEC_Abs,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xcf, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpBNE_PCRel, // 0xd0
OpDef.OpCMP_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpCMP_DPInd,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xd3, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xd4, OpDef.OpLDD_DPIndexX),
OpDef.OpCMP_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpDEC_DPIndexX,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xd7, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpCLD_Implied, // 0xd8
OpDef.OpCMP_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpPHX_StackPush,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xdb, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xdc, OpDef.OpLDD_Absolute),
OpDef.OpCMP_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpDEC_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xdf, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpCPX_Imm, // 0xe0
OpDef.OpSBC_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xe2, OpDef.OpLDD_Imm),
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xe3, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpCPX_DP,
OpDef.OpSBC_DP,
OpDef.OpINC_DP,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xe7, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpINX_Implied, // 0xe8
OpDef.OpSBC_Imm,
OpDef.OpNOP_Implied,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xeb, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpCPX_Abs,
OpDef.OpSBC_Abs,
OpDef.OpINC_Abs,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xef, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpBEQ_PCRel, // 0xf0
OpDef.OpSBC_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpSBC_DPInd,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xf3, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xf4, OpDef.OpLDD_DPIndexX),
OpDef.OpSBC_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpINC_DPIndexX,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xf7, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.OpSED_Implied, // 0xf8
OpDef.OpSBC_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpPLX_StackPull,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xfb, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xfc, OpDef.OpLDD_Absolute),
OpDef.OpSBC_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpINC_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.GenerateUndoc(0xff, OpDef.OpNOP_65C02),
}
};
// WDC 65802 and 65816. No undocumented opcodes -- all 256 are used.
private static CpuDef Cpu65816 { get; } = new CpuDef("WDC W65C816S", (1 << 24) - 1, true) {
Type = CpuType.Cpu65816,
mOpDefs = new OpDef[] {
Treat BRK as a 1-byte instruction The 65816 definition makes it a two-byte instruction, like COP. On the 6502 it acted like a two-byte instruction, but in practice very few assemblers treat it that way. Very few humans, for that matter. So it's now treated as a single byte instruction, with the following byte encoded as a data value.
2019-08-03 00:21:50 +00:00
OpDef.OpBRK_Implied, // 0x00
Initial file commit
2018-09-28 17:05:11 +00:00
OpDef.OpORA_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.OpCOP_StackInt,
OpDef.OpORA_StackRel,
OpDef.OpTSB_DP,
OpDef.OpORA_DP,
OpDef.OpASL_DP,
OpDef.OpORA_DPIndLong,
OpDef.OpPHP_StackPush, // 0x08
OpDef.OpORA_ImmLongA,
OpDef.OpASL_Acc,
OpDef.OpPHD_StackPush,
OpDef.OpTSB_Abs,
OpDef.OpORA_Abs,
OpDef.OpASL_Abs,
OpDef.OpORA_AbsLong,
OpDef.OpBPL_PCRel, // 0x10
OpDef.OpORA_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpORA_DPInd,
OpDef.OpORA_StackRelIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpTRB_DP,
OpDef.OpORA_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpASL_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpORA_DPIndIndexYLong,
OpDef.OpCLC_Implied, // 0x18
OpDef.OpORA_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpINC_Acc,
OpDef.OpTCS_Implied,
OpDef.OpTRB_Abs,
OpDef.OpORA_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpASL_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpORA_AbsIndexXLong,
OpDef.OpJSR_Abs, // 0x20
OpDef.OpAND_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.OpJSR_AbsLong,
OpDef.OpAND_StackRel,
OpDef.OpBIT_DP,
OpDef.OpAND_DP,
OpDef.OpROL_DP,
OpDef.OpAND_DPIndLong,
OpDef.OpPLP_StackPull, // 0x28
OpDef.OpAND_ImmLongA,
OpDef.OpROL_Acc,
OpDef.OpPLD_StackPull,
OpDef.OpBIT_Abs,
OpDef.OpAND_Abs,
OpDef.OpROL_Abs,
OpDef.OpAND_AbsLong,
OpDef.OpBMI_PCRel, // 0x30
OpDef.OpAND_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpAND_DPInd,
OpDef.OpAND_StackRelIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpBIT_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpAND_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpROL_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpAND_DPIndIndexYLong,
OpDef.OpSEC_Implied, // 0x38
OpDef.OpAND_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpDEC_Acc,
OpDef.OpTSC_Implied,
OpDef.OpBIT_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpAND_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpROL_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpAND_AbsIndexXLong,
OpDef.OpRTI_StackRTI, // 0x40
OpDef.OpEOR_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.OpWDM_WDM,
OpDef.OpEOR_StackRel,
OpDef.OpMVP_BlockMove,
OpDef.OpEOR_DP,
OpDef.OpLSR_DP,
OpDef.OpEOR_DPIndLong,
OpDef.OpPHA_StackPush, // 0x48
OpDef.OpEOR_ImmLongA,
OpDef.OpLSR_Acc,
OpDef.OpPHK_StackPush,
OpDef.OpJMP_Abs,
OpDef.OpEOR_Abs,
OpDef.OpLSR_Abs,
OpDef.OpEOR_AbsLong,
OpDef.OpBVC_PCRel, // 0x50
OpDef.OpEOR_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpEOR_DPInd,
OpDef.OpEOR_StackRelIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpMVN_BlockMove,
OpDef.OpEOR_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpLSR_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpEOR_DPIndIndexYLong,
OpDef.OpCLI_Implied, // 0x58
OpDef.OpEOR_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpPHY_StackPush,
OpDef.OpTCD_Implied,
OpDef.OpJMP_AbsLong,
OpDef.OpEOR_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpLSR_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpEOR_AbsIndexXLong,
OpDef.OpRTS_StackRTS, // 0x60
OpDef.OpADC_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.OpPER_StackPCRelLong,
OpDef.OpADC_StackRel,
OpDef.OpSTZ_DP,
OpDef.OpADC_DP,
OpDef.OpROR_DP,
OpDef.OpADC_DPIndLong,
OpDef.OpPLA_StackPull, // 0x68
OpDef.OpADC_ImmLongA,
OpDef.OpROR_Acc,
OpDef.OpRTL_StackRTL,
OpDef.OpJMP_AbsInd,
OpDef.OpADC_Abs,
OpDef.OpROR_Abs,
OpDef.OpADC_AbsLong,
OpDef.OpBVS_PCRel, // 0x70
OpDef.OpADC_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpADC_DPInd,
OpDef.OpADC_StackRelIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpSTZ_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpADC_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpROR_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpADC_DPIndIndexYLong,
OpDef.OpSEI_Implied, // 0x78
OpDef.OpADC_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpPLY_StackPull,
OpDef.OpTDC_Implied,
OpDef.OpJMP_AbsIndexXInd,
OpDef.OpADC_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpROR_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpADC_AbsIndexXLong,
OpDef.OpBRA_PCRel, // 0x80
OpDef.OpSTA_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.OpBRL_PCRelLong,
OpDef.OpSTA_StackRel,
OpDef.OpSTY_DP,
OpDef.OpSTA_DP,
OpDef.OpSTX_DP,
OpDef.OpSTA_DPIndLong,
OpDef.OpDEY_Implied, // 0x88
OpDef.OpBIT_ImmLongA,
OpDef.OpTXA_Implied,
OpDef.OpPHB_StackPush,
OpDef.OpSTY_Abs,
OpDef.OpSTA_Abs,
OpDef.OpSTX_Abs,
OpDef.OpSTA_AbsLong,
OpDef.OpBCC_PCRel, // 0x90
OpDef.OpSTA_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpSTA_DPInd,
OpDef.OpSTA_StackRelIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpSTY_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpSTA_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpSTX_DPIndexY,
OpDef.OpSTA_DPIndIndexYLong,
OpDef.OpTYA_Implied, // 0x98
OpDef.OpSTA_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpTXS_Implied,
OpDef.OpTXY_Implied,
OpDef.OpSTZ_Abs,
OpDef.OpSTA_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpSTZ_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpSTA_AbsIndexXLong,
OpDef.OpLDY_ImmLongXY, // 0xa0
OpDef.OpLDA_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.OpLDX_ImmLongXY,
OpDef.OpLDA_StackRel,
OpDef.OpLDY_DP,
OpDef.OpLDA_DP,
OpDef.OpLDX_DP,
OpDef.OpLDA_DPIndLong,
OpDef.OpTAY_Implied, // 0xa8
OpDef.OpLDA_ImmLongA,
OpDef.OpTAX_Implied,
OpDef.OpPLB_StackPull,
OpDef.OpLDY_Abs,
OpDef.OpLDA_Abs,
OpDef.OpLDX_Abs,
OpDef.OpLDA_AbsLong,
OpDef.OpBCS_PCRel, // 0xb0
OpDef.OpLDA_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpLDA_DPInd,
OpDef.OpLDA_StackRelIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpLDY_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpLDA_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpLDX_DPIndexY,
OpDef.OpLDA_DPIndIndexYLong,
OpDef.OpCLV_Implied, // 0xb8
OpDef.OpLDA_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpTSX_Implied,
OpDef.OpTYX_Implied,
OpDef.OpLDY_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpLDA_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpLDX_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpLDA_AbsIndexXLong,
OpDef.OpCPY_ImmLongXY, // 0xc0
OpDef.OpCMP_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.OpREP_Imm,
OpDef.OpCMP_StackRel,
OpDef.OpCPY_DP,
OpDef.OpCMP_DP,
OpDef.OpDEC_DP,
OpDef.OpCMP_DPIndLong,
OpDef.OpINY_Implied, // 0xc8
OpDef.OpCMP_ImmLongA,
OpDef.OpDEX_Implied,
OpDef.OpWAI_Implied,
OpDef.OpCPY_Abs,
OpDef.OpCMP_Abs,
OpDef.OpDEC_Abs,
OpDef.OpCMP_AbsLong,
OpDef.OpBNE_PCRel, // 0xd0
OpDef.OpCMP_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpCMP_DPInd,
OpDef.OpCMP_StackRelIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpPEI_StackDPInd,
OpDef.OpCMP_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpDEC_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpCMP_DPIndIndexYLong,
OpDef.OpCLD_Implied, // 0xd8
OpDef.OpCMP_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpPHX_StackPush,
OpDef.OpSTP_Implied,
OpDef.OpJMP_AbsIndLong,
OpDef.OpCMP_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpDEC_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpCMP_AbsIndexXLong,
OpDef.OpCPX_ImmLongXY, // 0xe0
OpDef.OpSBC_DPIndexXInd,
OpDef.OpSEP_Imm,
OpDef.OpSBC_StackRel,
OpDef.OpCPX_DP,
OpDef.OpSBC_DP,
OpDef.OpINC_DP,
OpDef.OpSBC_DPIndLong,
OpDef.OpINX_Implied, // 0xe8
OpDef.OpSBC_ImmLongA,
OpDef.OpNOP_Implied,
OpDef.OpXBA_Implied,
OpDef.OpCPX_Abs,
OpDef.OpSBC_Abs,
OpDef.OpINC_Abs,
OpDef.OpSBC_AbsLong,
OpDef.OpBEQ_PCRel, // 0xf0
OpDef.OpSBC_DPIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpSBC_DPInd,
OpDef.OpSBC_StackRelIndIndexY,
OpDef.OpPEA_StackAbs,
OpDef.OpSBC_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpINC_DPIndexX,
OpDef.OpSBC_DPIndIndexYLong,
OpDef.OpSED_Implied, // 0xf8
OpDef.OpSBC_AbsIndexY,
OpDef.OpPLX_StackPull,
OpDef.OpXCE_Implied,
OpDef.OpJSR_AbsIndexXInd,
OpDef.OpSBC_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpINC_AbsIndexX,
OpDef.OpSBC_AbsIndexXLong
}
};
}
}
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink