6502/6502bench
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fadden/6502bench.git synced 2024-07-14 05:28:55 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
68c324bbe8
6502bench/SourceGen/SGTestData/Expected/1003-flags-and-branches_64tass.S

270 lines
4.0 KiB
ArmAsm
Raw Normal View History

Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
.cpu "65816"
* = $1000
.as
.xs
clc
xce
sep #$ff
clv
cld
cli
clc
lda #$80
lda #$01
sed
sei
sec
lda #$ff
adc #$00
sep #$ff
rep #$80
rep #$40
rep #$20
.al
rep #$10
.xl
rep #$08
rep #$04
rep #$02
rep #$01
sep #$00
sep #$ff
.as
.xs
rep #$00
rep #$ff
.al
.xl
lda #$feed
sec
xce
.as
.xs
lda #$ff
rep #$30
lda #$ff
clc
xce
lda #$ff
rep #$20
.al
sep #$10
lda #$0000
ldx #$01
ldy #$02
sep #$20
.as
rep #$10
.xl
lda #$01
ldx #$0000
ldy #$0000
sep #$30
.xs
lda #$00
pha
plp
rep #$80
bpl L105F
.byte $00
.byte $00
L105F sep #$80
bpl L1065
bmi L1067
L1065 .byte $00
.byte $00
L1067 rep #$40
bvc L106D
.byte $00
.byte $00
L106D sep #$40
bvs L1073
.byte $00
.byte $00
L1073 rep #$01
bcc L1079
.byte $00
.byte $00
L1079 sep #$01
bcs L107F
.byte $00
.byte $00
L107F rep #$02
bne L1085
.byte $00
.byte $00
L1085 sep #$02
beq L108B
.byte $00
.byte $00
L108B sep #$ff
lda #$01
bne L1093
.byte $00
.byte $db
L1093 lda #$00
beq L1099
.byte $00
.byte $db
L1099 bpl L109D
.byte $00
.byte $db
L109D lda #$80
bmi L10A3
.byte $00
.byte $db
L10A3 lda #$ff
and #$00
beq L10AB
.byte $00
.byte $db
L10AB lda #$00
and #$ff
beq L10B3
.byte $00
.byte $db
L10B3 lda #$ff
and #$7f
bne L10BB
.byte $00
.byte $db
L10BB bpl L10BF
.byte $00
.byte $db
L10BF lda #$ff
and #$80
bmi L10C7
.byte $00
.byte $db
L10C7 lda #$00
ora #$00
beq L10CF
.byte $00
.byte $db
L10CF ora #$01
bne L10D5
.byte $00
.byte $db
L10D5 lda #$00
ora #$7f
bpl L10DD
.byte $00
.byte $db
L10DD ora #$80
bmi L10E3
.byte $00
.byte $db
L10E3 lda L10E3
sec
ror a
bmi L10EC
.byte $00
.byte $dc
L10EC clc
ror a
bpl L10F2
.byte $00
.byte $dc
L10F2 lda #$00
sec
rol a
bne L10FA
.byte $00
.byte $dc
L10FA clc
php
sec
plp
bcc L1102
.byte $00
.byte $00
Fix code tracing bug If you set things up just right, it's possible for flag status changes to fail to get merged. Added a regression test to 1003-flags-and-branches. Also, tweaked the instruction operand editor to be a bit smoother from the keyboard: added alt-key shortcuts, and put the focus on the OK button after creating/editing a label so you can just hit the return key twice.
2019-09-17 21:38:16 +00:00
L1102 sec
bcs L1106
L1105 clc
L1106 lda $33
beq L1105
bcs L110E
lda $44
L110E nop
rep #$20
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
.al
sep #$10
Fix code tracing bug If you set things up just right, it's possible for flag status changes to fail to get merged. Added a regression test to 1003-flags-and-branches. Also, tweaked the instruction operand editor to be a bit smoother from the keyboard: added alt-key shortcuts, and put the focus on the OK button after creating/editing a label so you can just hit the return key twice.
2019-09-17 21:38:16 +00:00
jsr L112A
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
rep #$30
.xl
Fix code tracing bug If you set things up just right, it's possible for flag status changes to fail to get merged. Added a regression test to 1003-flags-and-branches. Also, tweaked the instruction operand editor to be a bit smoother from the keyboard: added alt-key shortcuts, and put the focus on the OK button after creating/editing a label so you can just hit the return key twice.
2019-09-17 21:38:16 +00:00
jsr L1130
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
sep #$30
.as
.xs
Fix code tracing bug If you set things up just right, it's possible for flag status changes to fail to get merged. Added a regression test to 1003-flags-and-branches. Also, tweaked the instruction operand editor to be a bit smoother from the keyboard: added alt-key shortcuts, and put the focus on the OK button after creating/editing a label so you can just hit the return key twice.
2019-09-17 21:38:16 +00:00
jsr L1130
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
rep #$20
.al
sep #$10
Fix code tracing bug If you set things up just right, it's possible for flag status changes to fail to get merged. Added a regression test to 1003-flags-and-branches. Also, tweaked the instruction operand editor to be a bit smoother from the keyboard: added alt-key shortcuts, and put the focus on the OK button after creating/editing a label so you can just hit the return key twice.
2019-09-17 21:38:16 +00:00
jsr L112A
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
sep #$30
.as
rts
.al
Fix code tracing bug If you set things up just right, it's possible for flag status changes to fail to get merged. Added a regression test to 1003-flags-and-branches. Also, tweaked the instruction operand editor to be a bit smoother from the keyboard: added alt-key shortcuts, and put the focus on the OK button after creating/editing a label so you can just hit the return key twice.
2019-09-17 21:38:16 +00:00
L112A lda #$1234
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
ldx #$ff
rts
.as
Fix code tracing bug If you set things up just right, it's possible for flag status changes to fail to get merged. Added a regression test to 1003-flags-and-branches. Also, tweaked the instruction operand editor to be a bit smoother from the keyboard: added alt-key shortcuts, and put the focus on the OK button after creating/editing a label so you can just hit the return key twice.
2019-09-17 21:38:16 +00:00
L1130 lda #$ff
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
ldx #$ee
ldy #$dd
rts
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink