6502/6502bench
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fadden/6502bench.git synced 2024-11-03 23:06:09 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
97ca814854
6502bench/SourceGen/SGTestData/Expected/10000-allops-value-6502_64tass.S

297 lines
5.8 KiB
ArmAsm
Raw Normal View History

Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
.cpu "6502i"
* = $1000
jsr L1035
jsr L1038
jsr L1059
jsr L107D
jsr L109E
jsr L10BD
jsr L10C0
jsr L10E1
jsr L1100
jsr L1103
jsr L1116
jsr L1124
jsr L1169
jsr L11AE
jsr L11F3
jsr L1238
nop
nop
nop
Treat BRK as a 1-byte instruction The 65816 definition makes it a two-byte instruction, like COP. On the 6502 it acted like a two-byte instruction, but in practice very few assemblers treat it that way. Very few humans, for that matter. So it's now treated as a single byte instruction, with the following byte encoded as a data value.
2019-08-03 00:21:50 +00:00
brk
.byte $ff
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
L1035 ora ($ff,x)
jam
L1038 slo ($ff,x)
.byte $04,$ff
ora $ff
asl $ff
slo $ff
php
ora #$ff
asl a
anc #$ff
.byte $0c,$ff,$fe
ora $feff
asl $feff
slo $feff
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
bpl _L1056
_L1056 ora ($ff),y
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
.byte $12
L1059 slo ($ff),y
.byte $14,$ff
ora $ff,x
asl $ff,x
slo $ff,x
clc
ora $feff,y
.byte $1a
slo $feff,y
.byte $1c,$ff,$fe
ora $feff,x
asl $feff,x
slo $feff,x
jsr $feff
and ($ff,x)
.byte $22
L107D rla ($ff,x)
bit $ff
and $ff
rol $ff
rla $ff
plp
and #$ff
rol a
.byte $2b,$ff
bit $feff
and $feff
rol $feff
rla $feff
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
bmi _L109B
_L109B and ($ff),y
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
.byte $32
L109E rla ($ff),y
.byte $34,$ff
and $ff,x
rol $ff,x
rla $ff,x
sec
and $feff,y
.byte $3a
rla $feff,y
.byte $3c,$ff,$fe
and $feff,x
rol $feff,x
rla $feff,x
rti
L10BD eor ($ff,x)
.byte $42
L10C0 sre ($ff,x)
.byte $44,$ff
eor $ff
lsr $ff
sre $ff
pha
eor #$ff
lsr a
alr #$ff
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
jmp _L10D3
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
_L10D3 eor $feff
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
lsr $feff
sre $feff
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
bvc _L10DE
_L10DE eor ($ff),y
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
.byte $52
L10E1 sre ($ff),y
.byte $54,$ff
eor $ff,x
lsr $ff,x
sre $ff,x
cli
eor $feff,y
.byte $5a
sre $feff,y
.byte $5c,$ff,$fe
eor $feff,x
lsr $feff,x
sre $feff,x
rts
L1100 adc ($ff,x)
.byte $62
L1103 rra ($ff,x)
.byte $64,$ff
adc $ff
ror $ff
rra $ff
pla
adc #$ff
ror a
arr #$ff
jmp ($feff)
L1116 adc $feff
ror $feff
rra $feff
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
bvs _L1121
_L1121 adc ($ff),y
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
.byte $72
L1124 rra ($ff),y
.byte $74,$ff
adc $ff,x
ror $ff,x
rra $ff,x
sei
adc $feff,y
.byte $7a
rra $feff,y
.byte $7c,$ff,$fe
adc $feff,x
ror $feff,x
rra $feff,x
.byte $80,$ff
sta ($ff,x)
.byte $82,$ff
sax ($ff,x)
sty $ff
sta $ff
stx $ff
sax $ff
dey
.byte $89,$ff
txa
ane #$ff
sty $feff
sta $feff
stx $feff
sax $feff
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
bcc _L1166
_L1166 sta ($ff),y
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
.byte $92
L1169 .byte $93,$ff
sty $ff,x
sta $ff,x
stx $ff,y
sax $ff,y
tya
sta $feff,y
txs
tas $feff,y
shy $feff,x
sta $feff,x
shx $feff,y
sha $feff,y
ldy #$ff
lda ($ff,x)
ldx #$ff
lax ($ff,x)
ldy $ff
lda $ff
ldx $ff
lax $ff
tay
lda #$ff
tax
lax #$ff
ldy $feff
lda $feff
ldx $feff
lax $feff
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
bcs _L11AB
_L11AB lda ($ff),y
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
.byte $b2
L11AE lax ($ff),y
ldy $ff,x
lda $ff,x
ldx $ff,y
lax $ff,y
clv
lda $feff,y
tsx
las $feff,y
ldy $feff,x
lda $feff,x
ldx $feff,y
lax $feff,y
cpy #$ff
cmp ($ff,x)
.byte $c2,$ff
dcp ($ff,x)
cpy $ff
cmp $ff
dec $ff
dcp $ff
iny
cmp #$ff
dex
sbx #$ff
cpy $feff
cmp $feff
dec $feff
dcp $feff
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
bne _L11F0
_L11F0 cmp ($ff),y
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
.byte $d2
L11F3 dcp ($ff),y
.byte $d4,$ff
cmp $ff,x
dec $ff,x
dcp $ff,x
cld
cmp $feff,y
.byte $da
dcp $feff,y
.byte $dc,$ff,$fe
cmp $feff,x
dec $feff,x
dcp $feff,x
cpx #$ff
sbc ($ff,x)
.byte $e2,$ff
isc ($ff,x)
cpx $ff
sbc $ff
inc $ff
isc $ff
inx
sbc #$ff
nop
.byte $eb,$ff
cpx $feff
sbc $feff
inc $feff
isc $feff
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
beq _L1235
_L1235 sbc ($ff),y
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
.byte $f2
L1238 isc ($ff),y
.byte $f4,$ff
sbc $ff,x
inc $ff,x
isc $ff,x
sed
sbc $feff,y
.byte $fa
isc $feff,y
.byte $fc,$ff,$fe
sbc $feff,x
inc $feff,x
isc $feff,x
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink