6502/6502bench
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fadden/6502bench.git synced 2024-11-03 23:06:09 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
97ca814854
6502bench/SourceGen/SGTestData/Expected/10012-allops-zero-65816_64tass.S

288 lines
5.6 KiB
ArmAsm
Raw Normal View History

Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
.cpu "65816"
* = $1000
.as
.xs
sec
xce
jsr L101F
jsr L10AB
jsr L10F2
jsr L1106
jsr L1109
jsr L112C
jsr L11F9
jsr L11FC
nop
nop
nop
Treat BRK as a 1-byte instruction The 65816 definition makes it a two-byte instruction, like COP. On the 6502 it acted like a two-byte instruction, but in practice very few assemblers treat it that way. Very few humans, for that matter. So it's now treated as a single byte instruction, with the following byte encoded as a data value.
2019-08-03 00:21:50 +00:00
brk
.byte $00
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
L101F ora ($00,x)
Update 64tass handling of StackInt ops The operands for BRK and COP must be expressed as immediate mode constants, with a leading '#'.
2019-08-19 23:09:11 +00:00
cop #$00
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
ora $00,s
tsb $00
ora $00
asl $00
ora [$00]
php
ora #$00
asl a
phd
tsb @w$0000
ora @w$0000
asl @w$0000
ora @l$000000
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
bpl _L1041
_L1041 ora ($00),y
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
ora ($00)
ora ($00,s),y
trb $00
ora $00,x
asl $00,x
ora [$00],y
clc
ora $0000,y
inc a
tcs
trb @w$0000
ora @w$0000,x
asl @w$0000,x
ora @l$000000,x
jsr $0000
and ($00,x)
jsl $000000
and $00,s
bit $00
and $00
rol $00
and [$00]
plp
and #$00
rol a
pld
bit @w$0000
and @w$0000
rol @w$0000
and @l$000000
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
bmi _L1089
_L1089 and ($00),y
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
and ($00)
and ($00,s),y
bit $00,x
and $00,x
rol $00,x
and [$00],y
sec
and $0000,y
dec a
tsc
bit @w$0000,x
and @w$0000,x
rol @w$0000,x
and @l$000000,x
rti
L10AB eor ($00,x)
.byte $42,$00
eor $00,s
Reverse position on '#' in block move operands During a discussion with the cc65 developers, I became convinced that generating "MVN $01,$02" is wrong, and "MVN #$01,#$02" is correct. 64tass, cc65, and Merlin 32 all accept this syntax; only ACME does not. Operands without a leading '#' should be treated as 24-bit values, and have the bank byte extracted. This change updates the on-screen display and assembled output to include the '#'. The ACME generator uses a Quirk to suppress the hash mark. (It doesn't currently accept values larger than 8 bits, so there's no ambiguity.)
2019-08-08 20:02:01 +00:00
mvp #$00,#$00
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
eor $00
lsr $00
eor [$00]
pha
eor #$00
lsr a
phk
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
jmp _L10C2
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
_L10C2 eor @w$0000
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
lsr @w$0000
eor @l$000000
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
bvc _L10CE
_L10CE eor ($00),y
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
eor ($00)
eor ($00,s),y
Reverse position on '#' in block move operands During a discussion with the cc65 developers, I became convinced that generating "MVN $01,$02" is wrong, and "MVN #$01,#$02" is correct. 64tass, cc65, and Merlin 32 all accept this syntax; only ACME does not. Operands without a leading '#' should be treated as 24-bit values, and have the bank byte extracted. This change updates the on-screen display and assembled output to include the '#'. The ACME generator uses a Quirk to suppress the hash mark. (It doesn't currently accept values larger than 8 bits, so there's no ambiguity.)
2019-08-08 20:02:01 +00:00
mvn #$00,#$00
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
eor $00,x
lsr $00,x
eor [$00],y
cli
eor $0000,y
phy
tcd
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
jml _L10E7
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
_L10E7 eor @w$0000,x
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
lsr @w$0000,x
eor @l$000000,x
rts
L10F2 adc ($00,x)
per $0ff6
adc $00,s
stz $00
adc $00
ror $00
adc [$00]
pla
adc #$00
ror a
rtl
L1106 jmp ($0000)
L1109 adc @w$0000
ror @w$0000
adc @l$000000
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
bvs _L1115
_L1115 adc ($00),y
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
adc ($00)
adc ($00,s),y
stz $00,x
adc $00,x
ror $00,x
adc [$00],y
sei
adc $0000,y
ply
tdc
jmp ($0000,x)
L112C adc @w$0000,x
ror @w$0000,x
adc @l$000000,x
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
bra _L1138
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
_L1138 sta ($00,x)
brl _L113D
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
_L113D sta $00,s
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
sty $00
sta $00
stx $00
sta [$00]
dey
bit #$00
txa
phb
sty @w$0000
sta @w$0000
stx @w$0000
sta @l$000000
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
bcc _L115B
_L115B sta ($00),y
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
sta ($00)
sta ($00,s),y
sty $00,x
sta $00,x
stx $00,y
sta [$00],y
tya
sta $0000,y
txs
txy
stz @w$0000
sta @w$0000,x
stz @w$0000,x
sta @l$000000,x
ldy #$00
lda ($00,x)
ldx #$00
lda $00,s
ldy $00
lda $00
ldx $00
lda [$00]
tay
lda #$00
tax
plb
ldy @w$0000
lda @w$0000
ldx @w$0000
lda @l$000000
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
bcs _L11A0
_L11A0 lda ($00),y
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
lda ($00)
lda ($00,s),y
ldy $00,x
lda $00,x
ldx $00,y
lda [$00],y
clv
lda $0000,y
tsx
tyx
ldy @w$0000,x
lda @w$0000,x
ldx @w$0000,y
lda @l$000000,x
cpy #$00
cmp ($00,x)
rep #$00
cmp $00,s
cpy $00
cmp $00
dec $00
cmp [$00]
iny
cmp #$00
dex
wai
cpy @w$0000
cmp @w$0000
dec @w$0000
cmp @l$000000
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
bne _L11E5
_L11E5 cmp ($00),y
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
cmp ($00)
cmp ($00,s),y
pei ($00)
cmp $00,x
dec $00,x
cmp [$00],y
cld
cmp $0000,y
phx
stp
L11F9 jml [$0000]
L11FC cmp @w$0000,x
dec @w$0000,x
cmp @l$000000,x
cpx #$00
sbc ($00,x)
sep #$00
sbc $00,s
cpx $00
sbc $00
inc $00
sbc [$00]
inx
sbc #$00
nop
xba
cpx @w$0000
sbc @w$0000
inc @w$0000
sbc @l$000000
Finish removal of "disable label localizer" feature The label localizer is now always on. The regression tests turned it off by default, but that's no longer allowed, so the generated output has changed for many of them. The tests themselves were not altered.
2019-11-17 01:15:03 +00:00
beq _L122A
_L122A sbc ($00),y
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
sbc ($00)
sbc ($00,s),y
pea $0000
sbc $00,x
inc $00,x
sbc [$00],y
sed
sbc $0000,y
plx
xce
jsr ($0000,x)
sbc @w$0000,x
inc @w$0000,x
sbc @l$000000,x
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink