6502/6502bench
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fadden/6502bench.git synced 2024-07-06 16:29:03 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
cb114be0f6
6502bench/SourceGen/SGTestData/Expected/10022-embedded-instructions_64tass.S

26 lines
426 B
ArmAsm
Raw Normal View History

Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
.cpu "65816"
* = $1000
.as
.xs
Refactor tests 1002x and 1003x Tests 10022-embedded-instructions and 10032-flags-and-branches were a mix of 6502 and 65816 code. The 6502 code has been separated into its own file, so that the tests can be run on 8-bit-only assemblers.
2020-10-19 03:30:42 +00:00
jsr L1006
jmp L1020
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
Refactor tests 1002x and 1003x Tests 10022-embedded-instructions and 10032-flags-and-branches were a mix of 6502 and 65816 code. The 6502 code has been separated into its own file, so that the tests can be run on 8-bit-only assemblers.
2020-10-19 03:30:42 +00:00
L1006 sep #$30
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
lda $00
Refactor tests 1002x and 1003x Tests 10022-embedded-instructions and 10032-flags-and-branches were a mix of 6502 and 65816 code. The 6502 code has been separated into its own file, so that the tests can be run on 8-bit-only assemblers.
2020-10-19 03:30:42 +00:00
beq _L100F
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
lda #$00
Treat BRK as a 1-byte instruction The 65816 definition makes it a two-byte instruction, like COP. On the 6502 it acted like a two-byte instruction, but in practice very few assemblers treat it that way. Very few humans, for that matter. So it's now treated as a single byte instruction, with the following byte encoded as a data value.
2019-08-03 00:21:50 +00:00
brk
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
Refactor tests 1002x and 1003x Tests 10022-embedded-instructions and 10032-flags-and-branches were a mix of 6502 and 65816 code. The 6502 code has been separated into its own file, so that the tests can be run on 8-bit-only assemblers.
2020-10-19 03:30:42 +00:00
_L100F sta $012345
lda $00
beq _L101A
lda #$00
.byte $85
_L101A .byte $8f
eor $23
.byte $01
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
nop
rts
Refactor tests 1002x and 1003x Tests 10022-embedded-instructions and 10032-flags-and-branches were a mix of 6502 and 65816 code. The 6502 code has been separated into its own file, so that the tests can be run on 8-bit-only assemblers.
2020-10-19 03:30:42 +00:00
L1020 .byte $af
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink