6502/6502bench
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/fadden/6502bench.git synced 2024-11-19 06:31:02 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
d542a809f8
6502bench/SourceGen/SGTestData/Expected/2009-branches-and-banks_64tass.S

78 lines
1.4 KiB
ArmAsm
Raw Normal View History

Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
.cpu "65816"
longsym = $123456
* = $1000
.as
.xs
clc
xce
sep #$30
jmp L0000
.logical $0000
L0000 bit @wL0000
L0003 lda L0000
lda L0003
bne LFFC3
bmi $ffc3
per LFFC3
bcc L0016
brl L0080
lodat .byte $00
.byte $01
.byte $02
L0016 lda lodat+1
brl LFFC0
.here
.logical $0080
L0080 bit @wL0080
jml L440000
.here
.logical $ffc0
LFFC0 bit LFFC0
LFFC3 brl L0003
.here
.logical $440000
L440000 cmp L440000
L440004 lda L440000
Get 64tass expressions working We now insert parenthesis as needed. This can cause problems in some situations, so we always prefix parenthetical expressions with "0+", which looks goofy and is unnecessary for immediate operands. But it does generate working source code. Renamed the "simple" expression mode to "common", as it's not particularly simple but is what you'd expect most assemblers to do. (OTOH, life has been full of surprises.) (issue #16)
2018-10-24 21:57:09 +00:00
lda @w0+(L440000 & $ffff)
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
lda L0000
bmi L440004
per high44
bne high44
brl L44FFC0
Get 64tass expressions working We now insert parenthesis as needed. This can cause problems in some situations, so we always prefix parenthetical expressions with "0+", which looks goofy and is unnecessary for immediate operands. But it does generate working source code. Renamed the "simple" expression mode to "common", as it's not particularly simple but is what you'd expect most assemblers to do. (OTOH, life has been full of surprises.) (issue #16)
2018-10-24 21:57:09 +00:00
dat44 .word 0+(dat44 & $ffff)
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
.long dat44
.here
.logical $44ffc0
L44FFC0 cmp L44FFC0
high44 beq L44FFCB
bmi L440004
brl L440004
L44FFCB jml L2000
.here
.logical $2000
L2000 bit L2000
Get 64tass expressions working We now insert parenthesis as needed. This can cause problems in some situations, so we always prefix parenthetical expressions with "0+", which looks goofy and is unnecessary for immediate operands. But it does generate working source code. Renamed the "simple" expression mode to "common", as it's not particularly simple but is what you'd expect most assemblers to do. (OTOH, life has been full of surprises.) (issue #16)
2018-10-24 21:57:09 +00:00
pea 0+(dat44 & $ffff)
pea 0+(dat44 >> 16)
Progress toward 64tass support Most tests pass, but 2007-labels-and-symbols fails because the expressions recognized by 64tass don't match up with either of the other assemblers. This is currently using a workaround for the local label syntax. 64tass uses '_' as the prefix, which is unfortunate since SourceGen explicitly allowed underscores in labels. (So does 64tass for that matter, but it treats labels specially when the '_' comes first.) We will need to rename any non-local user labels that start with '_'. (issue #16)
2018-10-23 23:06:29 +00:00
bne L200E
jml [lodat]
L200E nop
jsr j2
j2 jsr j2+3
jsr j2-3
jsl longsym
rts
.here
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink