Split 2018x-extension-scripts

Created the 20180-extension-scripts test by cutting out the handful
of 65816-specific items from 20182.  Removed some issue-specific stuff
from 20182 that didn't need to be duplicated.  Renamed some stale
references to test 2022.

SourceGen/SGTestData/Source/20182-extension-scripts.S

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 ;
 ; Assembler: Merlin 32
 
-; EDIT: the project must include the platform symbol file and extension script
+; EDIT: the project must include the platform symbol file and extension scripts
 
 PrintInlineL1String  equ $011000
 PrintInlineL2String  equ $012000
@@ -43,36 +43,13 @@ PrintInlineDciString equ $013000        ;EDIT: add to project symbols
         brk     $02
         dw      data02
 
-; Handle an edge case where the inline formatting gets thrown out.
-; Two paths: BIT $A9 / BRK $85 / inline $FF/EA goes first, then
-; LDA $00 / STA $FF / NOP goes.  When we get to the STA we notice
-; that it's marked as inline data, so we remove it from $85 $ff
-; but not from $ea.
-;
-; If we try to walk through the file, advancing offset by the anattrib
-; length, we will traverse the first path, which (with 2-byte BRKs)
-; runs into the $FF, which is marked as an instruction but not an
-; instruction start.
-;
-; Switching to 1-byte BRKs makes the $85 an inline data item rather
-; than an instruction.  When we come back through, we LDA $00 and
-; then skip over the next 3 bytes.  No conflict.
-        nop
-        jsr     edge1                   ;alt path, evaluated later
-        dfb     $24                     ;1: BIT dp
-edge1   dfb     $a9                     ;2: LDA imm
-        brk                             ;1: BRK <op>
-        dfb     $85                     ;2: STA imm
-        dfb     $ff                     ;1: address $eaff
-        nop                             ;2:
-
-        jmp     Next1
+        jmp     Next
 
 PrintInline8String    rts               ;EDIT: set label
 PrintInlineRev8String rts               ;EDIT: set label
 PrintInlineNullString rts               ;EDIT: set label
 
-data01                                  ;EDIT: set label
+data01                                  ;EDIT: set label (unique local)
         dw      $1122                   ;should be little-endian
         dw      $4433                   ;should be big-endian
         hex     55667788                ;32-bit
@@ -85,43 +62,14 @@ data01                                  ;EDIT: set label
 
         dfb     $80
 
-data02                                  ;EDIT: set label, must be "data02"
+data02                                  ;EDIT: set label, must be "data02" (unique local)
         dw      data03
         dfb     $80
 
-data03                                  ;EDIT: set label
+data03                                  ;EDIT: set label (unique local)
         asc     "AllEight"
 
-
-;
-; The analyzer is trying to avoid calling the inline JSR check on code it
-; has previously visited.  There was a bug that caused us to lose the
-; no-continue value if code was revisited.
-;
-; To ensure we revisit the function, we need to call it, then call
-; something else that calls it, changing up the flags.
-;
-
-NoCont  pla
-        pla
-        rts
-
-TestNC1 jsr     NoCont
-        dfb     $00,$80
-TestNC2 jsr     NoCont
-        dfb     $00,$80
-
-Next1   jsr     TestNC1
-
-        jsr     PushThing
-        clc
-        jsr     TestNC2
-        rts
-
-PushThing
-        sec
-        jsr     TestNC2
-
+Next
 
 ; Make sure flags get marked as indeterminate across inline BRK.
 ; Also exercises formatting the same block twice.