mirror of
https://github.com/TomHarte/CLK.git
synced 2024-11-19 08:31:11 +00:00
Make a new guess at post-overflow DIV flags, based on tests.
Specifically: for DIVU, stick with the current guess of a fixed set. For DIVS, leave N and Z alone.
This commit is contained in:
parent
c7a5b054db
commit
7de1181213
@ -86,9 +86,6 @@ template <class T, bool dtack_is_implicit, bool signal_will_perform> void Proces
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if(active_step_->microcycle.data_select_active()) {
|
||||
// TODO: if valid peripheral address is asserted, substitute a
|
||||
// synhronous bus access.
|
||||
|
||||
// Check whether the processor needs to await DTack.
|
||||
if(!dtack_is_implicit && !dtack_ && !bus_error_) {
|
||||
execution_state_ = ExecutionState::WaitingForDTack;
|
||||
@ -999,12 +996,8 @@ template <class T, bool dtack_is_implicit, bool signal_will_perform> void Proces
|
||||
const auto quotient = dividend / divisor;
|
||||
|
||||
// If overflow would occur, appropriate flags are set and the result is not written back.
|
||||
if(quotient >= 65536) {
|
||||
overflow_flag_ =
|
||||
zero_result_ =
|
||||
negative_flag_ = 1;
|
||||
// TODO: Zero and Negative flags as above are merely sufficient
|
||||
// to satisfy the tests I currentl have. What should they really be?
|
||||
if(quotient > 65535) {
|
||||
overflow_flag_ = zero_result_ = negative_flag_ = 1;
|
||||
set_next_microcycle_length(HalfCycles(3*2*2));
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1075,11 +1068,6 @@ template <class T, bool dtack_is_implicit, bool signal_will_perform> void Proces
|
||||
if(quotient > 32767) {
|
||||
overflow_flag_ = 1;
|
||||
set_next_microcycle_length(HalfCycles(6*2*2));
|
||||
|
||||
// These are officially undefined for results that overflow, so the below is a guess.
|
||||
zero_result_ = decltype(zero_result_)(dividend);
|
||||
negative_flag_ = zero_result_ & 0x8000;
|
||||
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user