From dcb8176d90850f0d0b7d307ffbae40deb7f1162a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Harte <thomas.harte@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 17:58:27 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Corrects potential failure properly to set stack pointer
 state.

---
 Processors/68000/Implementation/68000Implementation.hpp | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Processors/68000/Implementation/68000Implementation.hpp b/Processors/68000/Implementation/68000Implementation.hpp
index 9f6f5e95d..e1d646518 100644
--- a/Processors/68000/Implementation/68000Implementation.hpp
+++ b/Processors/68000/Implementation/68000Implementation.hpp
@@ -1483,11 +1483,11 @@ template <class T, bool dtack_is_implicit, bool signal_will_perform> ProcessorSt
 template <class T, bool dtack_is_implicit, bool signal_will_perform> void Processor<T, dtack_is_implicit, signal_will_perform>::set_state(const ProcessorState &state) {
 	memcpy(data_, state.data, sizeof(state.data));
 	memcpy(address_, state.address, sizeof(state.address));
-	stack_pointers_[0].full = state.user_stack_pointer;
-	stack_pointers_[1].full = state.supervisor_stack_pointer;
 
 	set_status(state.status);
 
+	stack_pointers_[0].full = state.user_stack_pointer;
+	stack_pointers_[1].full = state.supervisor_stack_pointer;
 	address_[7] = stack_pointers_[is_supervisor_];
 }