6502/VolksForth
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/forth-ev/VolksForth.git synced 2024-12-26 01:29:49 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Checkin of original blocktest.fth

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Philip Zembrod 2020-07-25 00:31:12 +02:00
parent d11e618e6c
commit 07d2bc46fd
1 changed files with 675 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

675
6502/C64/tests/blocktest.fth Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,675 @@
\ To test the ANS Forth Block word set and extension words
\ This program was written by Steve Palmer in 2015, with contributions from
\ others where indicated, and is in the public domain - it can be distributed
\ and/or modified in any way but please retain this notice.
\ This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
\ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
\ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
\ The tests are not claimed to be comprehensive or correct
\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\ Version 0.1 23 October 2015 First Version
\ Version 0.2 15 November 2015 Updated after feedback from Gerry Jackson
\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\ The tests are based on John Hayes test program for the core word set
\
\ Words tested in this file are:
\ BLK BLOCK BUFFER EVALUATE FLUSH LOAD SAVE-BUFFERS UPDATE
\ EMPTY-BUFFERS LIST SCR THRU REFILL SAVE-INPUT RESTORE-INPUT \
\
\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\ Assumptions and dependencies:
\ - tester.fr or ttester.fs has been loaded prior to this file
\ - errorreport.fth has been loaded prior to this file
\ - utilities.fth has been loaded prioir to this file
\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TESTING Block word set
DECIMAL
\ Define these constants from the system documentation provided.
\ WARNING: The contents of the test blocks will be destroyed by this test.
\ The blocks tested will be in the range
\ FIRST-TEST-BLOCK <= u < LIMIT-TEST-BLOCK
\ The tests need at least 2 test blocks in the range to complete.
20 CONSTANT FIRST-TEST-BLOCK
30 CONSTANT LIMIT-TEST-BLOCK \ one beyond the last
FIRST-TEST-BLOCK LIMIT-TEST-BLOCK U< 0= [?IF]
\? .( Error: Test Block range not identified ) CR ABORT
[?THEN]
LIMIT-TEST-BLOCK FIRST-TEST-BLOCK - CONSTANT TEST-BLOCK-COUNT
TEST-BLOCK-COUNT 2 U< [?IF]
\? .( Error: At least 2 Test Blocks are required to run the tests ) CR ABORT
[?THEN]
\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TESTING Random Number Utilities
\ The block tests make extensive use of random numbers to select blocks to test
\ and to set the contents of the block. It also makes use of a Hash code to
\ ensure the integrity of the blocks against unexpected changes.
\ == Memory Walk tools ==
: @++ ( a-addr -- a-addr+4 a-addr@ )
DUP CELL+ SWAP @ ;
: !++ ( x a-addr -- a-addr+4 )
TUCK ! CELL+ ;
: C@++ ( c-addr -- c-addr;char+ c-addr@ )
DUP CHAR+ SWAP C@ ;
: C!++ ( char c-addr -- c-addr+1 )
TUCK ! CHAR+ ;
\ == Random Numbers ==
\ Based on "Xorshift" PRNG wikipedia page
\ reporting on results by George Marsaglia
\ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xorshift
\ Note: THIS IS NOT CRYPTOGRAPHIC QUALITY
: PRNG
CREATE ( "name" -- )
4 CELLS ALLOT
DOES> ( -- prng )
;
: PRNG-ERROR-CODE ( prng -- errcode | 0 )
0 4 0 DO \ prng acc
>R @++ R> OR \ prng acc'
LOOP \ prng xORyORzORw
NIP 0= ; \ xORyORzORw=0
: PRNG-COPY ( src-prng dst-prng -- )
4 CELLS MOVE ;
: PRNG-SET-SEED ( prng w z y x -- )
4 PICK \ prng w z y x prng
4 0 DO !++ LOOP DROP \ prng
DUP PRNG-ERROR-CODE IF \ prng
1 OVER +! \ prng
THEN \ prng
DROP ; \
BITS/CELL 64 = [?IF]
\? : PRNG-RND ( prng -- rnd )
\? DUP @
\? DUP 21 LSHIFT XOR
\? DUP 35 RSHIFT XOR
\? DUP 4 LSHIFT XOR
\? TUCK SWAP ! ;
[?THEN]
BITS/CELL 32 = [?IF]
\? : PRNG-RND ( prng -- rnd )
\? DUP @ \ prng x
\? DUP 11 LSHIFT XOR \ prng t=x^(x<<11)
\? DUP 8 RSHIFT XOR \ prng t'=t^(t>>8)
\? OVER DUP CELL+ SWAP 3 CELLS MOVE \ prng t'
\? OVER 3 CELLS + @ \ prng t' w
\? DUP 19 RSHIFT XOR \ prng t' w'=w^(w>>19)
\? XOR \ prng rnd=w'^t'
\? TUCK SWAP 3 CELLS + ! ; \ rnd
[?THEN]
BITS/CELL 16 = [?IF]
\? .( === NOT TESTED === )
\? \ From http://b2d-f9r.blogspot.co.uk/2010/08/16-bit-xorshift-rng-now-with-more.html
\? : PRNG-RND ( prng -- rnd )
\? DUP @ \ prng x
\? DUP 5 LSHIFT XOR \ prng t=x^(x<<5)
\? DUP 3 RSHIFT XOR \ prng t'=t^(t>>3)
\? OVER DUP CELL+ @ TUCK SWAP ! \ prng t' y
\? DUP 1 RSHIFT XOR \ prng t' y'=y^(y>>1)
\? XOR \ prng rnd=y'^t'
\? TUCK SWAP CELL+ ! ; \ rnd
[?THEN]
[?DEF] PRNG-RND
\? .( You need to add a Psuedo Random Number Generator for your cell size: )
\? BITS/CELL U. CR
\? ABORT
[?THEN]
: PRNG-RANDOM ( lower upper prng -- rnd )
>R OVER - R> PRNG-RND UM* NIP + ;
\ PostCondition: T{ lower upper 2DUP 2>R prng PRNG-RANDOM 2R> WITHIN -> TRUE }T
PRNG BLOCK-PRNG
\ Generated by Random.org
BLOCK-PRNG -1865266521 188896058 -2021545234 -1456609962 PRNG-SET-SEED
: BLOCK-RND ( -- rnd ) BLOCK-PRNG PRNG-RND ;
: BLOCK-RANDOM ( lower upper -- rnd ) BLOCK-PRNG PRNG-RANDOM ;
: RND-TEST-BLOCK ( -- blk )
FIRST-TEST-BLOCK LIMIT-TEST-BLOCK BLOCK-RANDOM ;
\ PostCondition: T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK FIRST-TEST-BLOCK LIMIT-TEST-BLOCK WITHIN -> TRUE }T
\ Two distinct random test blocks
: 2RND-TEST-BLOCKS ( -- blk1 blk2 )
RND-TEST-BLOCK BEGIN \ blk1
RND-TEST-BLOCK \ blk1 blk2
2DUP = \ blk1 blk2 blk1==blk2
WHILE \ blk1 blk1
DROP \ blk1
REPEAT ; \ blk1 blk2
\ PostCondition: T{ 2RND-TEST-BLOCKS = -> FALSE }T
\ first random test block in a sequence of length u
: RND-TEST-BLOCK-SEQ ( u -- blks )
FIRST-TEST-BLOCK LIMIT-TEST-BLOCK ROT 1- - BLOCK-RANDOM ;
\ I'm not sure if this algorithm is correct if " 1 CHARS 1 <> ".
: ELF-HASH-ACCUMULATE ( hash c-addr u -- hash )
>R SWAP R> 0 DO \ c-addr h
4 LSHIFT \ c-addr h<<=4
SWAP C@++ ROT + \ c-addr' h+=*s
DUP [ HEX ] F0000000 [ DECIMAL ] AND \ c-addr' h high=h&0xF0000000
DUP IF \ c-addr' h high
DUP >R 24 RSHIFT XOR R> \ c-addr' h^=high>>24 high
THEN \ c-addr' h high
INVERT AND \ c-addr' h&=~high
LOOP NIP ;
: ELF-HASH ( c-addr u -- hash )
0 ROT ROT ELF-HASH-ACCUMULATE ;
\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TESTING BLOCK ( read-only mode )
\ BLOCK signature
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK BLOCK DUP ALIGNED = -> TRUE }T
\ BLOCK accepts all blocks in the test range
: BLOCK-ALL ( blk2 blk1 -- )
DO
I BLOCK DROP
LOOP ;
T{ LIMIT-TEST-BLOCK FIRST-TEST-BLOCK BLOCK-ALL -> }T
\ BLOCK twice on same block returns the same value
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK DUP BLOCK SWAP BLOCK = -> TRUE }T
\ BLOCK twice on distinct block numbers
\ may or may not return the same value!
\ Nothing to test
\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TESTING BUFFER ( read-only mode )
\ Although it is not in the spirit of the specification,
\ a compliant definition of BUFFER would be
\ : BUFFER BLOCK ;
\ So we can only repeat the tests for BLOCK ...
\ BUFFER signature
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK BUFFER DUP ALIGNED = -> TRUE }T
\ BUFFER accepts all blocks in the test range
: BUFFER-ALL ( blk2 blk1 -- )
DO
I BUFFER DROP
LOOP ;
T{ LIMIT-TEST-BLOCK FIRST-TEST-BLOCK BUFFER-ALL -> }T
\ BUFFER twice on the same block returns the same value
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK DUP BUFFER SWAP BUFFER = -> TRUE }T
\ BUFFER twice on distinct block numbers
\ may or may not return the same value!
\ Nothing to test
\ Combinations with BUFFER
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK DUP BLOCK SWAP BUFFER = -> TRUE }T
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK DUP BUFFER SWAP BLOCK = -> TRUE }T
\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TESTING Read and Write access with UPDATE and FLUSH
\ Ideally, we'd like to be able to test the persistence across power cycles
\ of the writes, but we can't do that in a simple test.
\ The tests below could be fooled by a large buffers store and a tricky FLUSH
\ but what else are you going to do?
\ Signatures
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK BLOCK DROP UPDATE -> }T
T{ FLUSH -> }T
: BLANK-BUFFER ( blk -- blk-addr )
BUFFER DUP 1024 BL FILL ;
\ Test R/W of a Simple Blank Random Block
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK \ blk
DUP BLANK-BUFFER \ blk blk-addr1
1024 ELF-HASH \ blk hash
UPDATE FLUSH \ blk hash
SWAP BLOCK \ hash blk-addr2
1024 ELF-HASH = -> TRUE }T
\ Boundary Test: Modify first character
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK \ blk
DUP BLANK-BUFFER \ blk blk-addr1
CHAR \ OVER C! \ blk blk-addr1
1024 ELF-HASH \ blk hash
UPDATE FLUSH \ blk hash
SWAP BLOCK \ hash blk-addr2
1024 ELF-HASH = -> TRUE }T
\ Boundary Test: Modify last character
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK \ blk
DUP BLANK-BUFFER \ blk blk-addr1
CHAR \ OVER 1023 CHARS + C! \ blk blk-addr1
1024 ELF-HASH \ blk hash
UPDATE FLUSH \ blk hash
SWAP BLOCK \ hash blk-addr2
1024 ELF-HASH = -> TRUE }T
\ Boundary Test: First and Last (and all other) blocks in the test range
1024 8 * BITS/CELL / CONSTANT CELLS/BLOCK
: PREPARE-RND-BLOCK ( hash blk -- hash' )
BUFFER DUP \ hash blk-addr blk-addr
CELLS/BLOCK 0 DO \ hash blk-addr blk-addr[i]
BLOCK-RND OVER ! CELL+ \ hash blk-addr blk-addr[i+1]
LOOP DROP \ hash blk-addr
1024 ELF-HASH-ACCUMULATE ; \ hash'
: WRITE-RND-BLOCKS-WITH-HASH ( blk2 blk1 -- hash )
0 ROT ROT DO \ hash
I PREPARE-RND-BLOCK UPDATE \ hash'
LOOP ; \ hash'
: READ-BLOCKS-AND-HASH ( blk2 blk1 -- hash )
0 ROT ROT DO \ hash(i)
I BLOCK 1024 ELF-HASH-ACCUMULATE \ hash(i+1)
LOOP ; \ hash
T{ LIMIT-TEST-BLOCK FIRST-TEST-BLOCK WRITE-RND-BLOCKS-WITH-HASH FLUSH
LIMIT-TEST-BLOCK FIRST-TEST-BLOCK READ-BLOCKS-AND-HASH = -> TRUE }T
: TUF1 ( xt blk -- hash )
DUP BLANK-BUFFER \ xt blk blk-addr1
1024 ELF-HASH \ xt blk hash
ROT EXECUTE \ blk hash
SWAP BLOCK \ hash blk-addr2
1024 ELF-HASH = ; \ TRUE
\ Double UPDATE make no difference
: TUF1-1 ( -- ) UPDATE UPDATE FLUSH ;
T{ ' TUF1-1 RND-TEST-BLOCK TUF1 -> TRUE }T
\ Double FLUSH make no difference
: TUF1-2 ( -- ) UPDATE FLUSH FLUSH ;
T{ ' TUF1-2 RND-TEST-BLOCK TUF1 -> TRUE }T
\ FLUSH only saves UPDATEd buffers
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK \ blk
0 OVER PREPARE-RND-BLOCK \ blk hash
UPDATE FLUSH \ blk hash
OVER 0 SWAP PREPARE-RND-BLOCK DROP \ blk hash
FLUSH ( with no preliminary UPDATE) \ blk hash
SWAP BLOCK 1024 ELF-HASH = -> TRUE }T
\ UPDATE only marks the current block buffer
\ This test needs at least 2 distinct buffers, though this is not a
\ requirement of the language specification. If 2 distinct buffers
\ are not returned, then the tests quits with a trivial Pass
: TUF2 ( xt blk1 blk2 -- hash1'' hash2'' hash1' hash2' hash1 hash2 )
OVER BUFFER OVER BUFFER = IF \ test needs 2 distinct buffers
2DROP DROP 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ Dummy result
ELSE
OVER 0 SWAP PREPARE-RND-BLOCK UPDATE \ xt blk1 blk2 hash1
OVER 0 SWAP PREPARE-RND-BLOCK UPDATE \ xt blk1 blk2 hash1 hash2
2>R \ xt blk1 blk2
FLUSH \ xt blk1 blk2
OVER 0 SWAP PREPARE-RND-BLOCK \ xt blk1 blk2 hash1'
OVER 0 SWAP PREPARE-RND-BLOCK \ xt blk1 blk2 hash1' hash2'
2>R \ xt blk1 blk2
ROT EXECUTE \ blk1 blk2
FLUSH \ blk1 blk2
SWAP BLOCK 1024 ELF-HASH \ blk2 hash1''
SWAP BLOCK 1024 ELF-HASH \ hash1'' hash2''
2R> 2R> \ hash1'' hash2'' hash1' hash2' hash1 hash2
THEN ;
: 2= ( x1 x2 x3 x4 -- flag )
ROT = ROT ROT = AND ;
: TUF2-0 ( blk1 blk2 -- blk1 blk2 ) ; \ no updates
T{ ' TUF2-0 2RND-TEST-BLOCKS TUF2 \ run test procedure
2SWAP 2DROP 2= -> TRUE }T \ compare expected and actual
: TUF2-1 ( blk1 blk2 -- blk1 blk2 ) \ update blk1 only
OVER BLOCK DROP UPDATE ;
T{ ' TUF2-1 2RND-TEST-BLOCKS TUF2 \ run test procedure
SWAP DROP SWAP DROP 2= -> TRUE }T
: TUF2-2 ( blk1 blk2 -- blk1 blk2 ) \ update blk2 only
DUP BUFFER DROP UPDATE ;
T{ ' TUF2-2 2RND-TEST-BLOCKS TUF2 \ run test procedure
DROP ROT DROP SWAP 2= -> TRUE }T
: TUF2-3 ( blk1 blk2 -- blk1 blk2 ) \ update blk1 and blk2
TUF2-1 TUF2-2 ;
T{ ' TUF2-3 2RND-TEST-BLOCKS TUF2 \ run test procedure
2DROP 2= -> TRUE }T
\ FLUSH and then UPDATE is ambiguous and untestable
\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TESTING SAVE-BUFFERS
\ In principle, all the tests above can be repeated with SAVE-BUFFERS instead of
\ FLUSH. However, only the full random test is repeated...
T{ LIMIT-TEST-BLOCK FIRST-TEST-BLOCK WRITE-RND-BLOCKS-WITH-HASH SAVE-BUFFERS
LIMIT-TEST-BLOCK FIRST-TEST-BLOCK READ-BLOCKS-AND-HASH = -> TRUE }T
\ FLUSH and then SAVE-BUFFERS is harmless but undetectable
\ SAVE-BUFFERS and then FLUSH is undetectable
\ Unlike FLUSH, SAVE-BUFFERS then BUFFER/BLOCK
\ returns the original buffer address
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK DUP BLANK-BUFFER
SAVE-BUFFERS SWAP BUFFER = -> TRUE }T
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK DUP BLANK-BUFFER
UPDATE SAVE-BUFFERS SWAP BUFFER = -> TRUE }T
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK DUP BLANK-BUFFER
SAVE-BUFFERS SWAP BLOCK = -> TRUE }T
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK DUP BLANK-BUFFER
UPDATE SAVE-BUFFERS SWAP BLOCK = -> TRUE }T
\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TESTING BLK
\ Signature
T{ BLK DUP ALIGNED = -> TRUE }T
\ None of the words considered so far effect BLK
T{ BLK @ RND-TEST-BLOCK BUFFER DROP BLK @ = -> TRUE }T
T{ BLK @ RND-TEST-BLOCK BLOCK DROP BLK @ = -> TRUE }T
T{ BLK @ UPDATE BLK @ = -> TRUE }T
T{ BLK @ FLUSH BLK @ = -> TRUE }T
T{ BLK @ SAVE-BUFFERS BLK @ = -> TRUE }T
\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TESTING LOAD and EVALUATE
\ Signature: n LOAD --> blank screen
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK DUP BLANK-BUFFER DROP UPDATE FLUSH LOAD -> }T
T{ BLK @ RND-TEST-BLOCK DUP BLANK-BUFFER DROP UPDATE FLUSH LOAD BLK @ = -> TRUE }T
: WRITE-BLOCK ( blk c-addr u -- )
ROT BLANK-BUFFER SWAP CHARS MOVE UPDATE FLUSH ;
\ blk: u; blk LOAD
: TL1 ( u blk -- )
SWAP 0 <# #S #> WRITE-BLOCK ;
T{ BLOCK-RND RND-TEST-BLOCK 2DUP TL1 LOAD = -> TRUE }T
\ Boundary Test: FIRST-TEST-BLOCK
T{ BLOCK-RND FIRST-TEST-BLOCK 2DUP TL1 LOAD = -> TRUE }T
\ Boundary Test: LIMIT-TEST-BLOCK-1
T{ BLOCK-RND LIMIT-TEST-BLOCK 1- 2DUP TL1 LOAD = -> TRUE }T
: WRITE-AT-END-OF-BLOCK ( blk c-addr u -- )
ROT BLANK-BUFFER
OVER 1024 SWAP - CHARS +
SWAP CHARS MOVE UPDATE FLUSH ;
\ Boundary Test: End of Buffer
: TL2 ( u blk -- )
SWAP 0 <# #S #> WRITE-AT-END-OF-BLOCK ;
T{ BLOCK-RND RND-TEST-BLOCK 2DUP TL2 LOAD = -> TRUE }T
\ LOAD updates BLK
\ u: "BLK @"; u LOAD
: TL3 ( blk -- )
S" BLK @" WRITE-BLOCK ;
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK DUP TL3 DUP LOAD = -> TRUE }T
\ EVALUATE resets BLK
\ u: "EVALUATE-BLK@"; u LOAD
: EVALUATE-BLK@ ( -- BLK@ )
S" BLK @" EVALUATE ;
: TL4 ( blk -- )
S" EVALUATE-BLK@" WRITE-BLOCK ;
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK DUP TL4 LOAD -> 0 }T
\ EVALUTE can nest with LOAD
\ u: "BLK @"; S" u LOAD" EVALUATE
: TL5 ( blk -- c-addr u )
0 <# \ blk 0
[CHAR] D HOLD
[CHAR] A HOLD
[CHAR] O HOLD
[CHAR] L HOLD
BL HOLD
#S #> ; \ c-addr u
\T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK DUP TL3 DUP TL5 EVALUATE = -> TRUE }T
\ Nested LOADs
\ u2: "BLK @"; u1: "LOAD u2"; u1 LOAD
: TL6 ( blk1 blk2 -- )
DUP TL3 \ blk1 blk2
TL5 WRITE-BLOCK ;
T{ 2RND-TEST-BLOCKS 2DUP TL6 SWAP LOAD = -> TRUE }T
\ LOAD changes the currect block that is effected by UPDATE
\ This test needs at least 2 distinct buffers, though this is not a
\ requirement of the language specification. If 2 distinct buffers
\ are not returned, then the tests quits with a trivial Pass
: TL7 ( blk1 blk2 -- u1 u2 rnd2 blk2-addr rnd1' rnd1 )
OVER BUFFER OVER BUFFER = IF \ test needs 2 distinct buffers
2DROP 0 0 0 0 0 0 \ Dummy result
ELSE
OVER BLOCK-RND DUP ROT TL1 >R \ blk1 blk2
DUP S" SOURCE DROP" WRITE-BLOCK \ blk1 blk2
\ change blk1 to a new rnd, but don't UPDATE
OVER BLANK-BUFFER \ blk1 blk2 blk1-addr
BLOCK-RND DUP >R \ blk1 blk2 blk1-addr rnd1'
0 <# #S #> \ blk1 blk2 blk1-addr c-addr u
ROT SWAP CHARS MOVE \ blk1 blk2
\ Now LOAD blk2
DUP LOAD DUP >R \ blk1 blk2 blk2-addr
\ Write a new blk2
DUP 1024 BL FILL \ blk1 blk2 blk2-addr
BLOCK-RND DUP >R \ blk1 blk2 blk2-addr rnd2
0 <# #S #> \ blk1 blk2 blk2-addr c-addr u
ROT SWAP CHARS MOVE \ blk1 blk2
\ The following UPDATE should refer to the LOADed blk2, not blk1
UPDATE FLUSH \ blk1 blk2
\ Finally, load both blocks then collect all results
LOAD SWAP LOAD \ u2 u1
R> R> R> R> \ u2 u1 rnd2 blk2-addr rnd1' rnd1
THEN ;
T{ 2RND-TEST-BLOCKS TL7 \ run test procedure
SWAP DROP SWAP DROP \ u2 u1 rnd2 rnd1
2= -> TRUE }T
\ I would expect LOAD to work on the contents of the buffer cache
\ and not the block device, but the specification doesn't say.
\ Similarly, I would not expect LOAD to FLUSH the buffer cache,
\ but the specification doesn't say so.
\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TESTING LIST and SCR
\ Signatures
T{ SCR DUP ALIGNED = -> TRUE }T
\ LIST signature is test implicitly in the following tests...
: TLS1 ( blk -- )
S" Should show a (mostly) blank screen" WRITE-BLOCK ;
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK DUP TLS1 DUP LIST SCR @ = -> TRUE }T
\ Boundary Test: FIRST-TEST-BLOCK
: TLS2 ( blk -- )
S" List of the First test block" WRITE-BLOCK ;
T{ FIRST-TEST-BLOCK DUP TLS2 LIST -> }T
\ Boundary Test: LIMIT-TEST-BLOCK
: TLS3 ( blk -- )
S" List of the Last test block" WRITE-BLOCK ;
T{ LIMIT-TEST-BLOCK 1- DUP TLS3 LIST -> }T
\ Boundary Test: End of Screen
: TLS4 ( blk -- )
S" End of Screen" WRITE-AT-END-OF-BLOCK ;
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK DUP TLS4 LIST -> }T
\ BLOCK, BUFFER, UPDATE et al don't change SCR
: TLS5 ( blk -- )
S" Should show another (mostly) blank screen" WRITE-BLOCK ;
\ the first test below sets the scenario for the subsequent tests
\ BLK is unchanged by LIST
T{ BLK @ RND-TEST-BLOCK DUP TLS5 LIST BLK @ = -> TRUE }T
\ SCR is unchanged by Earlier words
T{ SCR @ FLUSH SCR @ = -> TRUE }T
T{ SCR @ FLUSH DUP 1+ BUFFER DROP SCR @ = -> TRUE }T
T{ SCR @ FLUSH DUP 1+ BLOCK DROP SCR @ = -> TRUE }T
T{ SCR @ FLUSH DUP 1+ BLOCK DROP UPDATE SCR @ = -> TRUE }T
T{ SCR @ FLUSH DUP 1+ BLOCK DROP UPDATE SAVE-BUFFERS SCR @ = -> TRUE }T
: TLS6 ( blk -- )
S" SCR @" WRITE-BLOCK ;
T{ SCR @ RND-TEST-BLOCK DUP TLS6 LOAD SCR @ OVER 2= -> TRUE }T
\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TESTING EMPTY-BUFFERS
T{ EMPTY-BUFFERS -> }T
T{ BLK @ EMPTY-BUFFERS BLK @ = -> TRUE }T
T{ SCR @ EMPTY-BUFFERS SCR @ = -> TRUE }T
\ Test R/W, but discarded changes with EMPTY-BUFFERS
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK \ blk
DUP BLANK-BUFFER \ blk blk-addr1
1024 ELF-HASH \ blk hash
UPDATE FLUSH \ blk hash
OVER BLOCK CHAR \ SWAP C! \ blk hash
UPDATE EMPTY-BUFFERS FLUSH \ blk hash
SWAP BLOCK \ hash blk-addr2
1024 ELF-HASH = -> TRUE }T
\ EMPTY-BUFFERS discards all buffers
: TUF2-EB ( blk1 blk2 -- blk1 blk2 )
TUF2-1 TUF2-2 EMPTY-BUFFERS ; \ c.f. TUF2-3
T{ ' TUF2-EB 2RND-TEST-BLOCKS TUF2
2SWAP 2DROP 2= -> TRUE }T
\ FLUSH and then EMPTY-BUFFERS is acceptable but untestable
\ EMPTY-BUFFERS and then UPDATE is ambiguous and untestable
\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TESTING >IN manipulation from a block source
: TIN ( blk -- )
S" 1 8 >IN +! 2 3" WRITE-BLOCK ;
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK DUP TIN LOAD -> 1 3 }T
\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TESTING \, SAVE-INPUT, RESTORE-INPUT and REFILL from a block source
\ Try to determine the number of charaters per line
\ Assumes an even number of characters per line
: | ( u -- u-2 ) 2 - ;
: C/L-CALC ( blk -- c/l )
DUP BLANK-BUFFER \ blk blk-addr
[CHAR] \ OVER C! \ blk blk-addr blk:"\"
511 0 DO \ blk c-addr[i]
CHAR+ CHAR+ [CHAR] | OVER C! \ blk c-addr[i+1]
LOOP DROP \ blk blk:"\ | | | | ... |"
UPDATE SAVE-BUFFERS FLUSH \ blk
1024 SWAP LOAD ; \ c/l
[?DEF] C/L
[?ELSE]
\? .( Given Characters per Line: ) C/L U. CR
[?ELSE]
\? RND-TEST-BLOCK C/L-CALC CONSTANT C/L
\? C/L 1024 U< [?IF]
\? .( Calculated Characters per Line: ) C/L U. CR
[?THEN]
: WRITE-BLOCK-LINE ( lin-addr[i] c-addr u -- lin-addr[i+1] )
2>R DUP C/L CHARS + SWAP 2R> ROT SWAP MOVE ;
\ Discards to the end of the line
: TCSIRIR1 ( blk -- )
BLANK-BUFFER
C/L 1024 U< IF
S" 2222 \ 3333" WRITE-BLOCK-LINE
S" 4444" WRITE-BLOCK-LINE
THEN
DROP UPDATE SAVE-BUFFERS ;
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK DUP TCSIRIR1 LOAD -> 2222 4444 }T
VARIABLE T-CNT 0 T-CNT !
: MARK ( "<char>" -- ) \ Use between <# and #>
CHAR HOLD ; IMMEDIATE
: ?EXECUTE ( xt f -- )
IF EXECUTE ELSE DROP THEN ;
\ SAVE-INPUT and RESTORE-INPUT within a single block
: TCSIRIR2-EXPECTED S" EDCBCBA" ; \ Remember that the string comes out backwards
: TCSIRIR2 ( blk -- )
C/L 1024 U< IF
BLANK-BUFFER
S" 0 T-CNT !" WRITE-BLOCK-LINE
S" <# MARK A SAVE-INPUT MARK B" WRITE-BLOCK-LINE
S" 1 T-CNT +! MARK C ' RESTORE-INPUT T-CNT @ 2 < ?EXECUTE MARK D" WRITE-BLOCK-LINE
S" MARK E 0 0 #>" WRITE-BLOCK-LINE
UPDATE SAVE-BUFFERS DROP
ELSE
S" 0 TCSIRIR2-EXPECTED" WRITE-BLOCK
THEN ;
T{ RND-TEST-BLOCK DUP TCSIRIR2 LOAD TCSIRIR2-EXPECTED S= -> 0 TRUE }T
\ REFILL across 2 blocks
: TCSIRIR3 ( blks -- )
DUP S" 1 2 3 REFILL 4 5 6" WRITE-BLOCK
1+ S" 10 11 12" WRITE-BLOCK ;
T{ 2 RND-TEST-BLOCK-SEQ DUP TCSIRIR3 LOAD -> 1 2 3 -1 10 11 12 }T
\ SAVE-INPUT and RESTORE-INPUT across 2 blocks
: TCSIRIR4-EXPECTED S" HGF1ECBF1ECBA" ; \ Remember that the string comes out backwards
: TCSIRIR4 ( blks -- )
C/L 1024 U< IF
DUP BLANK-BUFFER
S" 0 T-CNT !" WRITE-BLOCK-LINE
S" <# MARK A SAVE-INPUT MARK B" WRITE-BLOCK-LINE
S" MARK C REFILL MARK D" WRITE-BLOCK-LINE
DROP UPDATE 1+ BLANK-BUFFER
S" MARK E ABS CHAR 0 + HOLD" WRITE-BLOCK-LINE
S" 1 T-CNT +! MARK F ' RESTORE-INPUT T-CNT @ 2 < ?EXECUTE MARK G" WRITE-BLOCK-LINE
S" MARK H 0 0 #>" WRITE-BLOCK-LINE
DROP UPDATE SAVE-BUFFERS
ELSE
S" 0 TCSIRIR4-EXPECTED" WRITE-BLOCK
THEN ;
T{ 2 RND-TEST-BLOCK-SEQ DUP TCSIRIR4 LOAD TCSIRIR4-EXPECTED S= -> 0 TRUE }T
\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TESTING THRU
: TT1 ( blks -- )
DUP S" BLK" WRITE-BLOCK
1+ S" @" WRITE-BLOCK ;
T{ 2 RND-TEST-BLOCK-SEQ DUP TT1 DUP DUP 1+ THRU 1- = -> TRUE }T
\ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLOCK-ERRORS SET-ERROR-COUNT
CR .( End of Block word tests) CR