6502/cc65
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/cc65/cc65.git synced 2024-12-28 06:30:16 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Missing resp. ignored "volatile".

Browse Source 
git-svn-id: svn://svn.cc65.org/cc65/trunk@4084 b7a2c559-68d2-44c3-8de9-860c34a00d81
This commit is contained in:
uz 2009-08-30 07:55:21 +00:00
parent 8d5999c3a4
commit 829cb7de4c
1 changed files with 5 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
doc/cc65.sgml
View File

@ -428,6 +428,10 @@ and the one defined by the ISO standard:
conventions (see below). It means that you must not mix pointers to
those functions with pointers to user-written, not-fastcall functions.
<p>
<item> The <tt/volatile/ keyword doesn't have an effect. This is not as bad
as it sounds, since the 6502 has so few registers that it isn't
possible to keep values in registers anyway.
<p>
</itemize>
There may be some more minor differences I'm currently not aware of. The
@ -1068,7 +1072,7 @@ a future version. Instead use the format specifiers from the table above:
<sect>Implementation-defined behavior<p>
This section describes the behavior of cc65 when the standard describes the
behavior as implementation-defined.
behavior as implementation-defined.
(to be done)