2002-04-29 22:24:24 +00:00
|
|
|
; This test makes sure that mul instructions are properly eliminated.
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
|
2003-09-16 15:29:54 +00:00
|
|
|
; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -instcombine | llvm-dis | not grep mul
|
2002-04-29 22:24:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
implementation
|
|
|
|
|
2003-03-10 19:44:01 +00:00
|
|
|
int %test1(int %A) {
|
2002-04-29 22:24:24 +00:00
|
|
|
%B = mul int %A, 1
|
|
|
|
ret int %B
|
2003-03-10 19:44:01 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2002-04-29 22:24:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2003-03-10 19:44:01 +00:00
|
|
|
int %test2(int %A) {
|
2002-04-29 22:24:24 +00:00
|
|
|
%B = mul int %A, 2 ; Should convert to an add instruction
|
|
|
|
ret int %B
|
2003-03-10 19:44:01 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2002-04-29 22:24:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2003-03-10 19:44:01 +00:00
|
|
|
int %test3(int %A) {
|
2002-04-29 22:24:24 +00:00
|
|
|
%B = mul int %A, 0 ; This should disappear entirely
|
|
|
|
ret int %B
|
2003-03-10 19:44:01 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2002-04-29 22:24:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2003-02-18 19:28:47 +00:00
|
|
|
double %test4(double %A) {
|
|
|
|
%B = mul double 1.0, %A ; This is safe for FP
|
|
|
|
ret double %B
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int %test5(int %A) {
|
|
|
|
%B = mul int %A, 8
|
|
|
|
ret int %B
|
|
|
|
}
|
2003-03-10 22:43:56 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2003-06-25 17:10:34 +00:00
|
|
|
ubyte %test6(ubyte %A) {
|
2003-03-10 22:43:56 +00:00
|
|
|
%B = mul ubyte %A, 8
|
2003-06-28 22:31:37 +00:00
|
|
|
%C = mul ubyte %B, 8
|
2003-03-10 22:43:56 +00:00
|
|
|
ret ubyte %C
|
|
|
|
}
|
2003-06-25 17:10:34 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int %test7(int %i) {
|
|
|
|
%tmp = mul int %i, -1 ; %tmp = sub 0, %i
|
|
|
|
ret int %tmp
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ulong %test8(ulong %i) {
|
|
|
|
%j = mul ulong %i, 18446744073709551615 ; tmp = sub 0, %i
|
|
|
|
ret ulong %j
|
|
|
|
}
|
2003-09-11 22:23:48 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
uint %test9(uint %i) {
|
|
|
|
%j = mul uint %i, 4294967295 ; %j = sub 0, %i
|
|
|
|
ret uint %j
|
|
|
|
}
|