mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2025-01-01 00:33:09 +00:00
X86: PerformOrCombine introduced a vselect node with a wrong order of operands. This bug was introduced when a dedicated blend sdnode was replaced with the vselect node (in 139479).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@145488 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
parent
b72039cf52
commit
18197d7425
@ -13903,7 +13903,7 @@ static SDValue PerformOrCombine(SDNode *N, SelectionDAG &DAG,
|
||||
X = DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, BlendVT, X);
|
||||
Y = DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, BlendVT, Y);
|
||||
Mask = DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, BlendVT, Mask);
|
||||
Mask = DAG.getNode(ISD::VSELECT, DL, BlendVT, Mask, X, Y);
|
||||
Mask = DAG.getNode(ISD::VSELECT, DL, BlendVT, Mask, Y, X);
|
||||
return DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, VT, Mask);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
22
test/CodeGen/X86/2011-11-30-or.ll
Normal file
22
test/CodeGen/X86/2011-11-30-or.ll
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
|
||||
; RUN: llc < %s -mcpu=corei7 | FileCheck %s
|
||||
|
||||
; Test that the order of operands is correct
|
||||
; CHECK: select_func
|
||||
; CHECK: pblendvb %xmm1, %xmm2
|
||||
; CHECK: ret
|
||||
|
||||
define void @select_func() {
|
||||
entry:
|
||||
%c.lobit.i.i.i = ashr <8 x i16> <i16 17, i16 5, i16 1, i16 15, i16 19, i16 15, i16 4, i16 1> , <i16 15, i16 15, i16 15, i16 15, i16 15, i16 15, i16 15, i16 15>
|
||||
%a35 = bitcast <8 x i16> %c.lobit.i.i.i to <2 x i64>
|
||||
%and.i56.i.i.i = and <8 x i16> %c.lobit.i.i.i, <i16 25, i16 8, i16 65, i16 25, i16 8, i16 95, i16 15, i16 45>
|
||||
%and.i5.i.i.i = bitcast <8 x i16> %and.i56.i.i.i to <2 x i64>
|
||||
%neg.i.i.i.i = xor <2 x i64> %a35, <i64 -1, i64 -1>
|
||||
%and.i.i.i.i = and <2 x i64> zeroinitializer, %neg.i.i.i.i
|
||||
%or.i.i.i.i = or <2 x i64> %and.i.i.i.i, %and.i5.i.i.i
|
||||
%a37 = bitcast <2 x i64> %or.i.i.i.i to <8 x i16>
|
||||
store <8 x i16> %a37, <8 x i16> addrspace(1)* undef, align 4
|
||||
ret void
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user