mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2025-09-12 01:25:10 +00:00
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value.
This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
@@ -401,9 +401,8 @@ static Value *HandleByValArgument(Value *Arg, Instruction *TheCall,
|
||||
// isUsedByLifetimeMarker - Check whether this Value is used by a lifetime
|
||||
// intrinsic.
|
||||
static bool isUsedByLifetimeMarker(Value *V) {
|
||||
for (Value::use_iterator UI = V->use_begin(), UE = V->use_end(); UI != UE;
|
||||
++UI) {
|
||||
if (IntrinsicInst *II = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(*UI)) {
|
||||
for (User *U : V->users()) {
|
||||
if (IntrinsicInst *II = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(U)) {
|
||||
switch (II->getIntrinsicID()) {
|
||||
default: break;
|
||||
case Intrinsic::lifetime_start:
|
||||
@@ -423,11 +422,10 @@ static bool hasLifetimeMarkers(AllocaInst *AI) {
|
||||
return isUsedByLifetimeMarker(AI);
|
||||
|
||||
// Do a scan to find all the casts to i8*.
|
||||
for (Value::use_iterator I = AI->use_begin(), E = AI->use_end(); I != E;
|
||||
++I) {
|
||||
if (I->getType() != Int8PtrTy) continue;
|
||||
if (I->stripPointerCasts() != AI) continue;
|
||||
if (isUsedByLifetimeMarker(*I))
|
||||
for (User *U : AI->users()) {
|
||||
if (U->getType() != Int8PtrTy) continue;
|
||||
if (U->stripPointerCasts() != AI) continue;
|
||||
if (isUsedByLifetimeMarker(U))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user