Make DataLayout a plain object, not a pass.

Instead, have a DataLayoutPass that holds one. This will allow parts of LLVM
don't don't handle passes to also use DataLayout.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202168 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Rafael Espindola
2014-02-25 17:30:31 +00:00
parent 28713bdebc
commit 57edc9d4ff
60 changed files with 195 additions and 144 deletions

View File

@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ bool LTOCodeGenerator::generateObjectFile(raw_ostream &out,
passes.add(createVerifierPass());
// Add an appropriate DataLayout instance for this module...
passes.add(new DataLayout(*TargetMach->getDataLayout()));
passes.add(new DataLayoutPass(*TargetMach->getDataLayout()));
// Add appropriate TargetLibraryInfo for this module.
passes.add(new TargetLibraryInfo(Triple(TargetMach->getTargetTriple())));
@ -503,7 +503,7 @@ bool LTOCodeGenerator::generateObjectFile(raw_ostream &out,
PassManager codeGenPasses;
codeGenPasses.add(new DataLayout(*TargetMach->getDataLayout()));
codeGenPasses.add(new DataLayoutPass(*TargetMach->getDataLayout()));
formatted_raw_ostream Out(out);