[RewriteStatepointsForGC] Fix a bug on creating gc_relocate for pointer to vector of pointers

Summary:
In RewriteStatepointsForGC pass, we create a gc_relocate intrinsic for
each relocated pointer, and the gc_relocate has the same type with the
pointer. During the creation of gc_relocate intrinsic, llvm requires to
mangle its type. However, llvm does not support mangling of all possible
types. RewriteStatepointsForGC will hit an assertion failure when it
tries to create a gc_relocate for pointer to vector of pointers because
mangling for vector of pointers is not supported.

This patch changes the way RewriteStatepointsForGC pass creates
gc_relocate. For each relocated pointer, we erase the type of pointers
and create an unified gc_relocate of type i8 addrspace(1)*. Then a
bitcast is inserted to convert the gc_relocate to the correct type. In
this way, gc_relocate does not need to deal with different types of
pointers and the unsupported type mangling is no longer a problem. This
change would also ease further merge when LLVM erases types of pointers
and introduces an unified pointer type.

Some minor changes are also introduced to gc_relocate related part in
InstCombineCalls, CodeGenPrepare, and Verifier accordingly.

Patch by Chen Li!

Reviewers: reames, AndyAyers, sanjoy

Reviewed By: sanjoy

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9592

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@237009 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Sanjoy Das
2015-05-11 18:49:34 +00:00
parent 948b20ecb3
commit 5b5782c20e
12 changed files with 135 additions and 42 deletions

View File

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ entry:
joint:
; CHECK-LABEL: joint:
; CHECK: %phi1 = phi i64 addrspace(1)* [ %obj.relocated, %entry ], [ %obj3, %joint2 ]
; CHECK: %phi1 = phi i64 addrspace(1)* [ %obj.relocated.casted, %entry ], [ %obj3, %joint2 ]
%phi1 = phi i64 addrspace(1)* [ %obj, %entry ], [ %obj3, %joint2 ]
br i1 %condition, label %use, label %joint2
@@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ use:
joint2:
; CHECK-LABEL: joint2:
; CHECK: %phi2 = phi i64 addrspace(1)* [ %obj.relocated, %use ], [ %obj2.relocated, %joint ]
; CHECK: %obj3 = getelementptr i64, i64 addrspace(1)* %obj2.relocated, i32 1
; CHECK: %phi2 = phi i64 addrspace(1)* [ %obj.relocated.casted, %use ], [ %obj2.relocated.casted, %joint ]
; CHECK: %obj3 = getelementptr i64, i64 addrspace(1)* %obj2.relocated.casted, i32 1
%phi2 = phi i64 addrspace(1)* [ %obj, %use ], [ %obj2, %joint ]
%obj3 = getelementptr i64, i64 addrspace(1)* %obj2, i32 1
br label %joint
@@ -45,9 +45,9 @@ entry:
loop:
; CHECK: loop:
; CHECK-DAG: [ %obj_init.relocated, %loop.backedge ]
; CHECK-DAG: [ %obj_init.relocated.casted, %loop.backedge ]
; CHECK-DAG: [ %obj_init, %entry ]
; CHECK-DAG: [ %obj.relocated, %loop.backedge ]
; CHECK-DAG: [ %obj.relocated.casted, %loop.backedge ]
; CHECK-DAG: [ %obj, %entry ]
%index = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %index.inc, %loop.backedge ]
; CHECK-NOT: %location = getelementptr i64, i64 addrspace(1)* %obj, i32 %index
@@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ entry:
; CHECK-LABEL: @test3
; CHECK: gc.statepoint
; CHECK-NEXT: gc.relocate
; CHECK-NEXT: bitcast
; CHECK-NEXT: gc.statepoint
%safepoint_token = call i32 (void (i64)*, i32, i32, ...) @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_isVoidi64f(void (i64)* undef, i32 1, i32 0, i64 undef, i32 0, i32 5, i32 0, i32 -1, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0)
%safepoint_token1 = call i32 (i32 (i64 addrspace(1)*)*, i32, i32, ...) @llvm.experimental.gc.statepoint.p0f_i32p1i64f(i32 (i64 addrspace(1)*)* undef, i32 1, i32 0, i64 addrspace(1)* %obj, i32 0, i32 5, i32 0, i32 -1, i32 0, i32 0, i32 0)
@@ -262,10 +263,10 @@ callbb:
join:
; CHECK-LABEL: join:
; CHECK: phi i64 addrspace(1)* [ %obj.relocated, %callbb ], [ %obj, %entry ]
; CHECK: phi i64 addrspace(1)* [ %obj.relocated.casted, %callbb ], [ %obj, %entry ]
; CHECK: phi i64 addrspace(1)*
; CHECK-DAG: [ %obj, %entry ]
; CHECK-DAG: [ %obj2.relocated, %callbb ]
; CHECK-DAG: [ %obj2.relocated.casted, %callbb ]
; This is a phi outside the dominator region of the new defs inserted by
; the safepoint, BUT we can't stop the search here or we miss the second
; phi below.