6502/llvm-6502
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git synced 2024-12-29 10:32:47 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Misc cleanups

Browse Source 
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@1377 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Chris Lattner 2001-11-26 18:57:38 +00:00
parent faffb053fe
commit 5b7d42b142
1 changed files with 52 additions and 52 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

104
lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp
View File

@ -221,12 +221,12 @@ bool SCCP::doSCCP() {
// well... if not, terminate the do loop.
//
if (BB->getTerminator()->getNumSuccessors() == 1)
markExecutable(BB->getTerminator()->getSuccessor(0));
markExecutable(BB->getTerminator()->getSuccessor(0));
// Loop over all of the instructions and notify them that they are newly
// executable...
for_each(BB->begin(), BB->end(),
bind_obj(this, &SCCP::UpdateInstruction));
bind_obj(this, &SCCP::UpdateInstruction));
}
}
@ -247,17 +247,17 @@ bool SCCP::doSCCP() {
if (IV.isConstant()) {
ConstPoolVal *Const = IV.getConstant();
// cerr << "Constant: " << Inst << " is: " << Const;
// Replaces all of the uses of a variable with uses of the constant.
Inst->replaceAllUsesWith(Const);
// Remove the operator from the list of definitions...
Inst->getParent()->getInstList().remove(II.getInstructionIterator());
// The new constant inherits the old name of the operator...
if (Inst->hasName() && !Const->hasName())
Const->setName(Inst->getName(), M->getSymbolTableSure());
Const->setName(Inst->getName(), M->getSymbolTableSure());
// Delete the operator now...
delete Inst;
@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ bool SCCP::doSCCP() {
}
// UpdateInstruction - Something changed in this instruction... Either an
// UpdateInstruction - Something changed in this instruction... Either an
// operand made a transition, or the instruction is newly executable. Change
// the value type of I to reflect these changes if appropriate. This method
// makes sure to do the following actions:
@ -324,29 +324,29 @@ void SCCP::UpdateInstruction(Instruction *I) {
//
for (i = 0; i < NumValues; ++i) {
if (BBExecutable.count(PN->getIncomingBlock(i))) {
InstVal &IV = getValueState(PN->getIncomingValue(i));
if (IV.isUndefined()) continue; // Doesn't influence PHI node.
if (IV.isOverdefined()) { // PHI node becomes overdefined!
markOverdefined(PN);
return;
}
InstVal &IV = getValueState(PN->getIncomingValue(i));
if (IV.isUndefined()) continue; // Doesn't influence PHI node.
if (IV.isOverdefined()) { // PHI node becomes overdefined!
markOverdefined(PN);
return;
}
if (OperandIV == 0) { // Grab the first value...
OperandIV = &IV;
} else { // Another value is being merged in!
// There is already a reachable operand. If we conflict with it,
// then the PHI node becomes overdefined. If we agree with it, we
// can continue on.
// Check to see if there are two different constants merging...
if (IV.getConstant() != OperandIV->getConstant()) {
// Yes there is. This means the PHI node is not constant.
// You must be overdefined poor PHI.
//
markOverdefined(I); // The PHI node now becomes overdefined
return; // I'm done analyzing you
}
}
if (OperandIV == 0) { // Grab the first value...
OperandIV = &IV;
} else { // Another value is being merged in!
// There is already a reachable operand. If we conflict with it,
// then the PHI node becomes overdefined. If we agree with it, we
// can continue on.
// Check to see if there are two different constants merging...
if (IV.getConstant() != OperandIV->getConstant()) {
// Yes there is. This means the PHI node is not constant.
// You must be overdefined poor PHI.
//
markOverdefined(I); // The PHI node now becomes overdefined
return; // I'm done analyzing you
}
}
}
}
@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ void SCCP::UpdateInstruction(Instruction *I) {
case Instruction::Ret: return; // Method return doesn't affect anything
case Instruction::Br: { // Handle conditional branches...
BranchInst *BI = cast<BranchInst>(I);
if (BI->isUnconditional())
if (BI->isUnconditional())
return; // Unconditional branches are already handled!
InstVal &BCValue = getValueState(BI->getCondition());
@ -394,9 +394,9 @@ void SCCP::UpdateInstruction(Instruction *I) {
// Constant condition variables mean the branch can only go a single way.
ConstPoolBool *CPB = cast<ConstPoolBool>(BCValue.getConstant());
if (CPB->getValue()) // If the branch condition is TRUE...
markExecutable(BI->getSuccessor(0));
markExecutable(BI->getSuccessor(0));
else // Else if the br cond is FALSE...
markExecutable(BI->getSuccessor(1));
markExecutable(BI->getSuccessor(1));
}
return;
}
@ -406,18 +406,18 @@ void SCCP::UpdateInstruction(Instruction *I) {
InstVal &SCValue = getValueState(SI->getCondition());
if (SCValue.isOverdefined()) { // Overdefined condition? All dests are exe
for(unsigned i = 0; BasicBlock *Succ = SI->getSuccessor(i); ++i)
markExecutable(Succ);
markExecutable(Succ);
} else if (SCValue.isConstant()) {
ConstPoolVal *CPV = SCValue.getConstant();
// Make sure to skip the "default value" which isn't a value
for (unsigned i = 1, E = SI->getNumSuccessors(); i != E; ++i) {
if (SI->getSuccessorValue(i) == CPV) {// Found the right branch...
markExecutable(SI->getSuccessor(i));
return;
}
if (SI->getSuccessorValue(i) == CPV) {// Found the right branch...
markExecutable(SI->getSuccessor(i));
return;
}
}
// Constant value not equal to any of the branches... must execute
// Constant value not equal to any of the branches... must execute
// default branch then...
markExecutable(SI->getDefaultDest());
}
@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ void SCCP::UpdateInstruction(Instruction *I) {
default: break; // Handle math operators as groups.
} // end switch(I->getOpcode())
//===-------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Handle Unary instructions...
// Also treated as unary here, are cast instructions and getelementptr
@ -444,14 +444,14 @@ void SCCP::UpdateInstruction(Instruction *I) {
} else if (VState.isConstant()) { // Propogate constant value
ConstPoolVal *Result = isa<CastInst>(I)
? opt::ConstantFoldCastInstruction(VState.getConstant(), I->getType())
: opt::ConstantFoldUnaryInstruction(I->getOpcode(),
: opt::ConstantFoldUnaryInstruction(I->getOpcode(),
VState.getConstant());
if (Result) {
// This instruction constant folds!
markConstant(I, Result);
// This instruction constant folds!
markConstant(I, Result);
} else {
markOverdefined(I); // Don't know how to fold this instruction. :(
markOverdefined(I); // Don't know how to fold this instruction. :(
}
}
return;
@ -469,20 +469,20 @@ void SCCP::UpdateInstruction(Instruction *I) {
if (V1State.isOverdefined() || V2State.isOverdefined()) {
markOverdefined(I);
} else if (V1State.isConstant() && V2State.isConstant()) {
ConstPoolVal *Result =
opt::ConstantFoldBinaryInstruction(I->getOpcode(),
V1State.getConstant(),
V2State.getConstant());
ConstPoolVal *Result =
opt::ConstantFoldBinaryInstruction(I->getOpcode(),
V1State.getConstant(),
V2State.getConstant());
if (Result) {
// This instruction constant folds!
markConstant(I, Result);
// This instruction constant folds!
markConstant(I, Result);
} else {
markOverdefined(I); // Don't know how to fold this instruction. :(
markOverdefined(I); // Don't know how to fold this instruction. :(
}
}
return;
}
// Shouldn't get here... either the switch statement or one of the group
// handlers should have kicked in...
//