From 7178010a168a378df5d9be95956093a3e5f963fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dan Gohman Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:27:26 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Don't assume that the operand of an inttoptr is an pointer-sized integer. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@79651 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- lib/Analysis/ConstantFolding.cpp | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/lib/Analysis/ConstantFolding.cpp b/lib/Analysis/ConstantFolding.cpp index 19ea6033752..5dcb021acf6 100644 --- a/lib/Analysis/ConstantFolding.cpp +++ b/lib/Analysis/ConstantFolding.cpp @@ -138,8 +138,10 @@ static Constant *SymbolicallyEvaluateGEP(Constant* const* Ops, unsigned NumOps, // otherwise we can't. if (ConstantExpr *CE = dyn_cast(Ptr)) if (CE->getOpcode() == Instruction::IntToPtr) - if (ConstantInt *Base = dyn_cast(CE->getOperand(0))) + if (ConstantInt *Base = dyn_cast(CE->getOperand(0))) { BasePtr = Base->getValue(); + BasePtr.zextOrTrunc(BitWidth); + } if (BasePtr == 0) BaseIsInt = false;