mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2024-12-28 04:33:05 +00:00
PR21302. Vectorize only bottom-tested loops.
rdar://problem/18886083 git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@223171 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
parent
6845cace0e
commit
97be10d98f
@ -3537,6 +3537,15 @@ bool LoopVectorizationLegality::canVectorize() {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// We only handle bottom-tested loops, i.e. loop in which the condition is
|
||||
// checked at the end of each iteration. With that we can assume that all
|
||||
// instructions in the loop are executed the same number of times.
|
||||
if (TheLoop->getExitingBlock() != TheLoop->getLoopLatch()) {
|
||||
emitAnalysis(
|
||||
Report() << "loop control flow is not understood by vectorizer");
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// We need to have a loop header.
|
||||
DEBUG(dbgs() << "LV: Found a loop: " <<
|
||||
TheLoop->getHeader()->getName() << '\n');
|
||||
|
31
test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/loop-form.ll
Normal file
31
test/Transforms/LoopVectorize/loop-form.ll
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
||||
; RUN: opt -S -loop-vectorize < %s | FileCheck %s
|
||||
target datalayout = "e-m:o-i64:64-f80:128-n8:16:32:64-S128"
|
||||
|
||||
; Check that we vectorize only bottom-tested loops.
|
||||
; This is a reduced testcase from PR21302.
|
||||
;
|
||||
; rdar://problem/18886083
|
||||
|
||||
%struct.X = type { i32, i16 }
|
||||
; CHECK-LABEL: @foo(
|
||||
; CHECK-NOT: vector.body
|
||||
|
||||
define void @foo(i32 %n) {
|
||||
entry:
|
||||
br label %for.cond
|
||||
|
||||
for.cond:
|
||||
%i = phi i32 [ 0, %entry ], [ %inc, %for.body ]
|
||||
%cmp = icmp slt i32 %i, %n
|
||||
br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %if.end
|
||||
|
||||
for.body:
|
||||
%iprom = sext i32 %i to i64
|
||||
%b = getelementptr inbounds %struct.X* undef, i64 %iprom, i32 1
|
||||
store i16 0, i16* %b, align 4
|
||||
%inc = add nsw i32 %i, 1
|
||||
br label %for.cond
|
||||
|
||||
if.end:
|
||||
ret void
|
||||
}
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user