R600/SI: Allow using f32 rcp / rsq when denormals not handled.

These are precise enough to use for OpenCL unless denormals
are handled.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@213107 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Matt Arsenault
2014-07-15 23:50:10 +00:00
parent 6f7532bb97
commit a27bf373d9
6 changed files with 45 additions and 27 deletions

View File

@@ -936,16 +936,27 @@ SDValue SITargetLowering::LowerSELECT(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
return DAG.getNode(ISD::BITCAST, DL, MVT::i64, Res);
}
static SDValue performUnsafeFDIV(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
// Catch division cases where we can use shortcuts with rcp and rsq
// instructions.
SDValue SITargetLowering::LowerFastFDIV(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
SDLoc SL(Op);
SDValue LHS = Op.getOperand(0);
SDValue RHS = Op.getOperand(1);
EVT VT = Op.getValueType();
bool Unsafe = DAG.getTarget().Options.UnsafeFPMath;
if (const ConstantFPSDNode *CLHS = dyn_cast<ConstantFPSDNode>(LHS)) {
if (CLHS->isExactlyValue(1.0)) {
if ((Unsafe || (VT == MVT::f32 && !Subtarget->hasFP32Denormals())) &&
CLHS->isExactlyValue(1.0)) {
// v_rcp_f32 and v_rsq_f32 do not support denormals, and according to
// the CI documentation has a worst case error of 1 ulp.
// OpenCL requires <= 2.5 ulp for 1.0 / x, so it should always be OK to
// use it as long as we aren't trying to use denormals.
// 1.0 / sqrt(x) -> rsq(x)
//
// XXX - Is UnsafeFPMath sufficient to do this for f64? The maximum ULP
// error seems really high at 2^29 ULP.
if (RHS.getOpcode() == ISD::FSQRT)
return DAG.getNode(AMDGPUISD::RSQ, SL, VT, RHS.getOperand(0));
@@ -954,15 +965,25 @@ static SDValue performUnsafeFDIV(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) {
}
}
// Turn into multiply by the reciprocal
// x / y -> x * (1.0 / y)
SDValue Recip = DAG.getNode(AMDGPUISD::RCP, SL, VT, RHS);
return DAG.getNode(ISD::FMUL, SL, VT, LHS, Recip);
if (Unsafe) {
// Turn into multiply by the reciprocal.
// x / y -> x * (1.0 / y)
SDValue Recip = DAG.getNode(AMDGPUISD::RCP, SL, VT, RHS);
return DAG.getNode(ISD::FMUL, SL, VT, LHS, Recip);
}
return SDValue();
}
SDValue SITargetLowering::LowerFDIV32(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
if (DAG.getTarget().Options.UnsafeFPMath)
return performUnsafeFDIV(Op, DAG);
SDValue FastLowered = LowerFastFDIV(Op, DAG);
if (FastLowered.getNode())
return FastLowered;
// This uses v_rcp_f32 which does not handle denormals. Let this hit a
// selection error for now rather than do something incorrect.
if (Subtarget->hasFP32Denormals())
return SDValue();
SDLoc SL(Op);
SDValue LHS = Op.getOperand(0);

View File

@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ class SITargetLowering : public AMDGPUTargetLowering {
SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
SDValue LowerLOAD(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
SDValue LowerSELECT(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
SDValue LowerFastFDIV(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
SDValue LowerFDIV32(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
SDValue LowerFDIV64(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;
SDValue LowerFDIV(SDValue Op, SelectionDAG &DAG) const;

View File

@@ -1800,10 +1800,9 @@ def : Pat <
// VOP1 Patterns
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
let Predicates = [UnsafeFPMath] in {
def : RcpPat<V_RCP_F64_e32, f64>;
defm : RsqPat<V_RSQ_F64_e32, f64>;
let Predicates = [UnsafeFPMath] in {
defm : RsqPat<V_RSQ_F32_e32, f32>;
}