6502/llvm-6502
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git synced 2025-01-15 23:31:37 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Add missing 'to' and rephrase an explanation of GCC's assumptions.

Browse Source 
Wordsmithing by Matt Beaumont-Gay in response to r164389.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164395 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
David Blaikie 2012-09-21 18:03:02 +00:00
parent 67bf429a6a
commit b890e9fc66
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
docs/CodingStandards.rst
View File

@ -830,11 +830,11 @@ off by default but turned on when building LLVM with a version of Clang that
supports the warning.
A knock-on effect of this stylistic requirement is that when building LLVM with
GCC you may get warnings related "control may reach end of non-void function"
GCC you may get warnings related to "control may reach end of non-void function"
if you return from each case of a covered switch-over-enum because GCC assumes
that the enum expression may take any representable value, not just those in
the enumeration. To suppress this warning, use ``llvm_unreachable`` after the
switch.
that the enum expression may take any representable value, not just those of
individual enumerators. To suppress this warning, use ``llvm_unreachable`` after
the switch.
Use ``LLVM_DELETED_FUNCTION`` to mark uncallable methods
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^