From c7ff6c8029ac3595e87ea80ad7a08eafbcca52b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Lattner <sabre@nondot.org>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 23:45:06 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Getting ADCE to interact well with unreachable instructions
 seems like a nontrivial exercise that I'm not interested in tackling right
 now.  Just punt and treat them like unwind's.

This 'fixes' test/Regression/Transforms/ADCE/unreachable-function.ll


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@17106 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
---
 lib/Transforms/Scalar/ADCE.cpp | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/ADCE.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/ADCE.cpp
index e1f228d6fab..22b4c347dcb 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/ADCE.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/ADCE.cpp
@@ -233,8 +233,9 @@ bool ADCE::doADCE() {
           markInstructionLive(I);
         }
       } else if (I->mayWriteToMemory() || isa<ReturnInst>(I) ||
-                 isa<UnwindInst>(I)) {
-        // Unreachable instructions are not marked intrinsically live here.
+                 isa<UnwindInst>(I) || isa<UnreachableInst>(I)) {
+        // FIXME: Unreachable instructions should not be marked intrinsically
+        // live here.
 	markInstructionLive(I);
       } else if (isInstructionTriviallyDead(I)) {
         // Remove the instruction from it's basic block...