mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2025-06-14 14:24:05 +00:00
SjLj EH could produce a machine basic block that legitimately has more than one
landing pad as its successor. SjLj exception handling jumps to the correct landing pad via a switch statement that's generated right before code-gen. Loosen the constraint in the machine instruction verifier to allow for this. Note, this isn't the most rigorous check since we cannot determine where that switch statement came from. But it's marginally better than turning this check off when SjLj exceptions are used. <rdar://problem/9187612> git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@130881 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
|
||||
// the verifier errors.
|
||||
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||||
|
||||
#include "llvm/Instructions.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Function.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/CodeGen/LiveIntervalAnalysis.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/CodeGen/LiveVariables.h"
|
||||
@ -32,6 +33,7 @@
|
||||
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineMemOperand.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/CodeGen/Passes.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/MC/MCAsmInfo.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Target/TargetMachine.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Target/TargetRegisterInfo.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Target/TargetInstrInfo.h"
|
||||
@ -394,7 +396,13 @@ MachineVerifier::visitMachineBasicBlockBefore(const MachineBasicBlock *MBB) {
|
||||
if ((*I)->isLandingPad())
|
||||
LandingPadSuccs.insert(*I);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (LandingPadSuccs.size() > 1)
|
||||
|
||||
const MCAsmInfo *AsmInfo = TM->getMCAsmInfo();
|
||||
const BasicBlock *BB = MBB->getBasicBlock();
|
||||
if (LandingPadSuccs.size() > 1 &&
|
||||
!(AsmInfo &&
|
||||
AsmInfo->getExceptionHandlingType() == ExceptionHandling::SjLj &&
|
||||
BB && isa<SwitchInst>(BB->getTerminator())))
|
||||
report("MBB has more than one landing pad successor", MBB);
|
||||
|
||||
// Call AnalyzeBranch. If it succeeds, there several more conditions to check.
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user