mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2025-07-22 23:24:59 +00:00
Resurrect r191017 " GVN proceeds in the presence of dead code" plus a fix to PR17307 & 17308.
The problem of r191017 is that when GVN fabricate a val-number for a dead instruction (in order to make following expr-PRE happy), it forget to fabricate a leader-table entry for it as well. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@191118 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
|
||||
#include "llvm/ADT/DepthFirstIterator.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/ADT/Hashing.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/ADT/SetVector.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Analysis/AliasAnalysis.h"
|
||||
#include "llvm/Analysis/CFG.h"
|
||||
@@ -507,7 +508,9 @@ namespace {
|
||||
enum ValType {
|
||||
SimpleVal, // A simple offsetted value that is accessed.
|
||||
LoadVal, // A value produced by a load.
|
||||
MemIntrin // A memory intrinsic which is loaded from.
|
||||
MemIntrin, // A memory intrinsic which is loaded from.
|
||||
UndefVal // A UndefValue representing a value from dead block (which
|
||||
// is not yet physically removed from the CFG).
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/// V - The value that is live out of the block.
|
||||
@@ -545,10 +548,20 @@ namespace {
|
||||
Res.Offset = Offset;
|
||||
return Res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
static AvailableValueInBlock getUndef(BasicBlock *BB) {
|
||||
AvailableValueInBlock Res;
|
||||
Res.BB = BB;
|
||||
Res.Val.setPointer(0);
|
||||
Res.Val.setInt(UndefVal);
|
||||
Res.Offset = 0;
|
||||
return Res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool isSimpleValue() const { return Val.getInt() == SimpleVal; }
|
||||
bool isCoercedLoadValue() const { return Val.getInt() == LoadVal; }
|
||||
bool isMemIntrinValue() const { return Val.getInt() == MemIntrin; }
|
||||
bool isUndefValue() const { return Val.getInt() == UndefVal; }
|
||||
|
||||
Value *getSimpleValue() const {
|
||||
assert(isSimpleValue() && "Wrong accessor");
|
||||
@@ -576,6 +589,7 @@ namespace {
|
||||
DominatorTree *DT;
|
||||
const DataLayout *TD;
|
||||
const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI;
|
||||
SetVector<BasicBlock *> DeadBlocks;
|
||||
|
||||
ValueTable VN;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -698,6 +712,9 @@ namespace {
|
||||
unsigned replaceAllDominatedUsesWith(Value *From, Value *To,
|
||||
const BasicBlockEdge &Root);
|
||||
bool propagateEquality(Value *LHS, Value *RHS, const BasicBlockEdge &Root);
|
||||
bool processFoldableCondBr(BranchInst *BI);
|
||||
void addDeadBlock(BasicBlock *BB);
|
||||
void assignValNumForDeadCode();
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
char GVN::ID = 0;
|
||||
@@ -1253,8 +1270,10 @@ static Value *ConstructSSAForLoadSet(LoadInst *LI,
|
||||
// just use the dominating value directly.
|
||||
if (ValuesPerBlock.size() == 1 &&
|
||||
gvn.getDominatorTree().properlyDominates(ValuesPerBlock[0].BB,
|
||||
LI->getParent()))
|
||||
LI->getParent())) {
|
||||
assert(!ValuesPerBlock[0].isUndefValue() && "Dead BB dominate this block");
|
||||
return ValuesPerBlock[0].MaterializeAdjustedValue(LI->getType(), gvn);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Otherwise, we have to construct SSA form.
|
||||
SmallVector<PHINode*, 8> NewPHIs;
|
||||
@@ -1324,7 +1343,7 @@ Value *AvailableValueInBlock::MaterializeAdjustedValue(Type *LoadTy, GVN &gvn) c
|
||||
<< *getCoercedLoadValue() << '\n'
|
||||
<< *Res << '\n' << "\n\n\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
} else if (isMemIntrinValue()) {
|
||||
const DataLayout *TD = gvn.getDataLayout();
|
||||
assert(TD && "Need target data to handle type mismatch case");
|
||||
Res = GetMemInstValueForLoad(getMemIntrinValue(), Offset,
|
||||
@@ -1332,6 +1351,10 @@ Value *AvailableValueInBlock::MaterializeAdjustedValue(Type *LoadTy, GVN &gvn) c
|
||||
DEBUG(dbgs() << "GVN COERCED NONLOCAL MEM INTRIN:\nOffset: " << Offset
|
||||
<< " " << *getMemIntrinValue() << '\n'
|
||||
<< *Res << '\n' << "\n\n\n");
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
assert(isUndefValue() && "Should be UndefVal");
|
||||
DEBUG(dbgs() << "GVN COERCED NONLOCAL Undef:\n";);
|
||||
return UndefValue::get(LoadTy);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return Res;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1355,6 +1378,13 @@ void GVN::AnalyzeLoadAvailability(LoadInst *LI, LoadDepVect &Deps,
|
||||
BasicBlock *DepBB = Deps[i].getBB();
|
||||
MemDepResult DepInfo = Deps[i].getResult();
|
||||
|
||||
if (DeadBlocks.count(DepBB)) {
|
||||
// Dead dependent mem-op disguise as a load evaluating the same value
|
||||
// as the load in question.
|
||||
ValuesPerBlock.push_back(AvailableValueInBlock::getUndef(DepBB));
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!DepInfo.isDef() && !DepInfo.isClobber()) {
|
||||
UnavailableBlocks.push_back(DepBB);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
@@ -2191,11 +2221,13 @@ bool GVN::processInstruction(Instruction *I) {
|
||||
// For conditional branches, we can perform simple conditional propagation on
|
||||
// the condition value itself.
|
||||
if (BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(I)) {
|
||||
if (!BI->isConditional() || isa<Constant>(BI->getCondition()))
|
||||
if (!BI->isConditional())
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
Value *BranchCond = BI->getCondition();
|
||||
if (isa<Constant>(BI->getCondition()))
|
||||
return processFoldableCondBr(BI);
|
||||
|
||||
Value *BranchCond = BI->getCondition();
|
||||
BasicBlock *TrueSucc = BI->getSuccessor(0);
|
||||
BasicBlock *FalseSucc = BI->getSuccessor(1);
|
||||
// Avoid multiple edges early.
|
||||
@@ -2312,6 +2344,9 @@ bool GVN::runOnFunction(Function& F) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (EnablePRE) {
|
||||
// Fabricate val-num for dead-code in order to suppress assertion in
|
||||
// performPRE().
|
||||
assignValNumForDeadCode();
|
||||
bool PREChanged = true;
|
||||
while (PREChanged) {
|
||||
PREChanged = performPRE(F);
|
||||
@@ -2325,6 +2360,9 @@ bool GVN::runOnFunction(Function& F) {
|
||||
// Actually, when this happens, we should just fully integrate PRE into GVN.
|
||||
|
||||
cleanupGlobalSets();
|
||||
// Do not cleanup DeadBlocks in cleanupGlobalSets() as it's called for each
|
||||
// iteration.
|
||||
DeadBlocks.clear();
|
||||
|
||||
return Changed;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -2335,6 +2373,9 @@ bool GVN::processBlock(BasicBlock *BB) {
|
||||
// (and incrementing BI before processing an instruction).
|
||||
assert(InstrsToErase.empty() &&
|
||||
"We expect InstrsToErase to be empty across iterations");
|
||||
if (DeadBlocks.count(BB))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
bool ChangedFunction = false;
|
||||
|
||||
for (BasicBlock::iterator BI = BB->begin(), BE = BB->end();
|
||||
@@ -2628,3 +2669,124 @@ void GVN::verifyRemoved(const Instruction *Inst) const {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// BB is declared dead, which implied other blocks become dead as well. This
|
||||
// function is to add all these blocks to "DeadBlocks". For the dead blocks'
|
||||
// live successors, update their phi nodes by replacing the operands
|
||||
// corresponding to dead blocks with UndefVal.
|
||||
//
|
||||
void GVN::addDeadBlock(BasicBlock *BB) {
|
||||
SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 4> NewDead;
|
||||
SmallSetVector<BasicBlock *, 4> DF;
|
||||
|
||||
NewDead.push_back(BB);
|
||||
while (!NewDead.empty()) {
|
||||
BasicBlock *D = NewDead.pop_back_val();
|
||||
if (DeadBlocks.count(D))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
// All blocks dominated by D are dead.
|
||||
SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 8> Dom;
|
||||
DT->getDescendants(D, Dom);
|
||||
DeadBlocks.insert(Dom.begin(), Dom.end());
|
||||
|
||||
// Figure out the dominance-frontier(D).
|
||||
for (SmallVectorImpl<BasicBlock *>::iterator I = Dom.begin(),
|
||||
E = Dom.end(); I != E; I++) {
|
||||
BasicBlock *B = *I;
|
||||
for (succ_iterator SI = succ_begin(B), SE = succ_end(B); SI != SE; SI++) {
|
||||
BasicBlock *S = *SI;
|
||||
if (DeadBlocks.count(S))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
bool AllPredDead = true;
|
||||
for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(S), PE = pred_end(S); PI != PE; PI++)
|
||||
if (!DeadBlocks.count(*PI)) {
|
||||
AllPredDead = false;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!AllPredDead) {
|
||||
// S could be proved dead later on. That is why we don't update phi
|
||||
// operands at this moment.
|
||||
DF.insert(S);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// While S is not dominated by D, it is dead by now. This could take
|
||||
// place if S already have a dead predecessor before D is declared
|
||||
// dead.
|
||||
NewDead.push_back(S);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// For the dead blocks' live successors, update their phi nodes by replacing
|
||||
// the operands corresponding to dead blocks with UndefVal.
|
||||
for(SmallSetVector<BasicBlock *, 4>::iterator I = DF.begin(), E = DF.end();
|
||||
I != E; I++) {
|
||||
BasicBlock *B = *I;
|
||||
if (DeadBlocks.count(B))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(B), PE = pred_end(B); PI != PE; PI++) {
|
||||
BasicBlock *P = *PI;
|
||||
if (!DeadBlocks.count(P))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
for (BasicBlock::iterator II = B->begin(); isa<PHINode>(II); ++II) {
|
||||
PHINode &Phi = cast<PHINode>(*II);
|
||||
Phi.setIncomingValue(Phi.getBasicBlockIndex(P),
|
||||
UndefValue::get(Phi.getType()));
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// If the given branch is recognized as a foldable branch (i.e. conditional
|
||||
// branch with constant condition), it will perform following analyses and
|
||||
// transformation.
|
||||
// 1) If the dead out-coming edge is a critical-edge, split it. Let
|
||||
// R be the target of the dead out-coming edge.
|
||||
// 1) Identify the set of dead blocks implied by the branch's dead outcoming
|
||||
// edge. The result of this step will be {X| X is dominated by R}
|
||||
// 2) Identify those blocks which haves at least one dead prodecessor. The
|
||||
// result of this step will be dominance-frontier(R).
|
||||
// 3) Update the PHIs in DF(R) by replacing the operands corresponding to
|
||||
// dead blocks with "UndefVal" in an hope these PHIs will optimized away.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// Return true iff *NEW* dead code are found.
|
||||
bool GVN::processFoldableCondBr(BranchInst *BI) {
|
||||
if (!BI || BI->isUnconditional())
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
ConstantInt *Cond = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(BI->getCondition());
|
||||
if (!Cond)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
BasicBlock *DeadRoot = Cond->getZExtValue() ?
|
||||
BI->getSuccessor(1) : BI->getSuccessor(0);
|
||||
if (DeadBlocks.count(DeadRoot))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!DeadRoot->getSinglePredecessor())
|
||||
DeadRoot = splitCriticalEdges(BI->getParent(), DeadRoot);
|
||||
|
||||
addDeadBlock(DeadRoot);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// performPRE() will trigger assert if it come across an instruciton without
|
||||
// associated val-num. As it normally has far more live instructions than dead
|
||||
// instructions, it makes more sense just to "fabricate" a val-number for the
|
||||
// dead code than checking if instruction involved is dead or not.
|
||||
void GVN::assignValNumForDeadCode() {
|
||||
for (SetVector<BasicBlock *>::iterator I = DeadBlocks.begin(),
|
||||
E = DeadBlocks.end(); I != E; I++) {
|
||||
BasicBlock *BB = *I;
|
||||
for (BasicBlock::iterator II = BB->begin(), EE = BB->end();
|
||||
II != EE; II++) {
|
||||
Instruction *Inst = &*II;
|
||||
unsigned ValNum = VN.lookup_or_add(Inst);
|
||||
addToLeaderTable(ValNum, Inst, BB);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user