From db2b18febaea04d01b3dcb24fc44d5be7bd27a00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bob Wilson Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 17:34:47 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix a DAG combiner assertion failure when constant folding BUILD_VECTORS. svn r139159 caused SelectionDAG::getConstant() to promote BUILD_VECTOR operands with illegal types, even before type legalization. For this testcase, that led to one BUILD_VECTOR with i16 operands and another with promoted i32 operands, which triggered the assertion. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@142370 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp | 15 +++++++++++++-- test/CodeGen/ARM/vector-DAGCombine.ll | 10 ++++++++++ 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp index 7b878688df6..10daa31b6a3 100644 --- a/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp +++ b/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp @@ -7261,8 +7261,19 @@ SDValue DAGCombiner::SimplifyVBinOp(SDNode *N) { } EVT VT = LHSOp.getValueType(); - assert(RHSOp.getValueType() == VT && - "SimplifyVBinOp with different BUILD_VECTOR element types"); + EVT RVT = RHSOp.getValueType(); + if (RVT != VT) { + // Integer BUILD_VECTOR operands may have types larger than the element + // size (e.g., when the element type is not legal). Prior to type + // legalization, the types may not match between the two BUILD_VECTORS. + // Truncate one of the operands to make them match. + if (RVT.getSizeInBits() > VT.getSizeInBits()) { + RHSOp = DAG.getNode(ISD::TRUNCATE, N->getDebugLoc(), VT, RHSOp); + } else { + LHSOp = DAG.getNode(ISD::TRUNCATE, N->getDebugLoc(), RVT, LHSOp); + VT = RVT; + } + } SDValue FoldOp = DAG.getNode(N->getOpcode(), LHS.getDebugLoc(), VT, LHSOp, RHSOp); if (FoldOp.getOpcode() != ISD::UNDEF && diff --git a/test/CodeGen/ARM/vector-DAGCombine.ll b/test/CodeGen/ARM/vector-DAGCombine.ll index 81bdc44863b..1a97982eb0a 100644 --- a/test/CodeGen/ARM/vector-DAGCombine.ll +++ b/test/CodeGen/ARM/vector-DAGCombine.ll @@ -123,3 +123,13 @@ define void @orVec(<3 x i8>* %A) nounwind { ret void } +; The following test was hitting an assertion in the DAG combiner when +; constant folding the multiply because the "sext undef" was translated to +; a BUILD_VECTOR with i32 0 operands, which did not match the i16 operands +; of the other BUILD_VECTOR. +define i16 @foldBuildVectors() { + %1 = sext <8 x i8> undef to <8 x i16> + %2 = mul <8 x i16> %1, + %3 = extractelement <8 x i16> %2, i32 0 + ret i16 %3 +}