From e3f1459b7d885a50dc4de8eccc869a590eb339b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dmitri Gribenko Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:00:58 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Coding standards: fix typo: '= deleted' -> '= delete'. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@164126 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8 --- docs/CodingStandards.rst | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/CodingStandards.rst b/docs/CodingStandards.rst index bc58f57cb74..4d16e2a9bd6 100644 --- a/docs/CodingStandards.rst +++ b/docs/CodingStandards.rst @@ -826,14 +826,14 @@ unimplemented copy constructor and copy assignment operator and make them private. This would give a compiler error for accessing a private method or a linker error because it wasn't implemented. -With C++11, we can mark methods that won't be implemented with ``= deleted``. +With C++11, we can mark methods that won't be implemented with ``= delete``. This will trigger a much better error message and tell the compiler that the method will never be implemented. This enables other checks like ``-Wunused-private-field`` to run correctly on classes that contain these methods. To maintain compatibility with C++03, ``LLVM_DELETED_FUNCTION`` should be used -which will expand to ``= deleted`` if the compiler supports it. These methods +which will expand to ``= delete`` if the compiler supports it. These methods should still be declared private. Example of the uncopyable pattern: .. code-block:: c++