6502/llvm-6502
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git synced 2025-02-08 06:32:24 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

this part implemented.

Browse Source 
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@31122 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
Chris Lattner 2006-10-22 21:40:12 +00:00
parent 92a8b71dc1
commit ecb8d06356
1 changed files with 0 additions and 29 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

29
lib/Target/X86/README.txt
View File

@ -607,35 +607,6 @@ or eax, 2
cmp eax, 6 cmp eax, 6
jz label jz label
If we aren't going to do this, we should lower the switch better. We compile
the code to:
_f:
movl 8(%esp), %eax
movl 4(%esp), %ecx
cmpl $6, %ecx
jl LBB1_4 #entry
jmp LBB1_3 #entry
LBB1_3: #entry
cmpl $6, %ecx
je LBB1_1 #bb
jmp LBB1_2 #UnifiedReturnBlock
LBB1_4: #entry
cmpl $4, %ecx
jne LBB1_2 #UnifiedReturnBlock
LBB1_1: #bb
incl %eax
ret
LBB1_2: #UnifiedReturnBlock
ret
In the code above, the 'if' is turned into a 'switch' at the mid-level. It
looks like the 'lower to branches' mode could be improved a little here. In
particular, the fall-through to LBB1_3 doesn't need a branch. It would also be
nice to eliminate the redundant "cmp 6", maybe by lowering to a linear sequence
of compares if there are below a certain number of cases (instead of a binary
sequence)?
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===// //===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
GCC's ix86_expand_int_movcc function (in i386.c) has a ton of interesting GCC's ix86_expand_int_movcc function (in i386.c) has a ton of interesting