mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2025-01-05 12:31:33 +00:00
ARM IAS: fix after r198172
The DPR and SPR register lists are also register lists. Furthermore, the registers need not be checked individually since the register type can be checked via the list kind. Use that to simplify the logic and fix the incorrect assertion. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@198174 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This commit is contained in:
parent
dd2836776f
commit
ee6d3cd701
@ -5112,13 +5112,13 @@ bool ARMAsmParser::ParseInstruction(ParseInstructionInfo &Info, StringRef Name,
|
||||
SMLoc NameLoc,
|
||||
SmallVectorImpl<MCParsedAsmOperand*> &Operands) {
|
||||
// FIXME: Can this be done via tablegen in some fashion?
|
||||
bool HasPrecisionRestrictions;
|
||||
bool RequireVFPRegisterList;
|
||||
bool AcceptDoublePrecisionOnly;
|
||||
bool AcceptSinglePrecisionOnly;
|
||||
HasPrecisionRestrictions = Name.startswith("fldm") || Name.startswith("fstm");
|
||||
RequireVFPRegisterList = Name.startswith("fldm") || Name.startswith("fstm");
|
||||
AcceptDoublePrecisionOnly =
|
||||
HasPrecisionRestrictions && (Name.back() == 'd' || Name.back() == 'x');
|
||||
AcceptSinglePrecisionOnly = HasPrecisionRestrictions && Name.back() == 's';
|
||||
RequireVFPRegisterList && (Name.back() == 'd' || Name.back() == 'x');
|
||||
AcceptSinglePrecisionOnly = RequireVFPRegisterList && Name.back() == 's';
|
||||
|
||||
// Apply mnemonic aliases before doing anything else, as the destination
|
||||
// mnemonic may include suffices and we want to handle them normally.
|
||||
@ -5288,24 +5288,14 @@ bool ARMAsmParser::ParseInstruction(ParseInstructionInfo &Info, StringRef Name,
|
||||
|
||||
Parser.Lex(); // Consume the EndOfStatement
|
||||
|
||||
if (HasPrecisionRestrictions) {
|
||||
if (RequireVFPRegisterList) {
|
||||
ARMOperand *Op = static_cast<ARMOperand*>(Operands.back());
|
||||
assert(Op->isRegList());
|
||||
const SmallVectorImpl<unsigned> &RegList = Op->getRegList();
|
||||
for (SmallVectorImpl<unsigned>::const_iterator RLI = RegList.begin(),
|
||||
RLE = RegList.end();
|
||||
RLI != RLE; ++RLI) {
|
||||
if (AcceptSinglePrecisionOnly &&
|
||||
!ARMMCRegisterClasses[ARM::SPRRegClassID].contains(*RLI))
|
||||
return Error(Op->getStartLoc(),
|
||||
"VFP/Neon single precision register expected");
|
||||
else if (AcceptDoublePrecisionOnly &&
|
||||
!ARMMCRegisterClasses[ARM::DPRRegClassID].contains(*RLI))
|
||||
return Error(Op->getStartLoc(),
|
||||
"VFP/Neon double precision register expected");
|
||||
else
|
||||
llvm_unreachable("must have single or double precision restrictions");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (AcceptSinglePrecisionOnly && !Op->isSPRRegList())
|
||||
return Error(Op->getStartLoc(),
|
||||
"VFP/Neon single precision register expected");
|
||||
if (AcceptDoublePrecisionOnly && !Op->isDPRRegList())
|
||||
return Error(Op->getStartLoc(),
|
||||
"VFP/Neon double precision register expected");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Some instructions, mostly Thumb, have forms for the same mnemonic that
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user