ARM64 suffered multiple -verify-machineinstr failures (principally over the
xsp/xzr issue) because FastISel was completely ignoring which subset of the
general-purpose registers each instruction required.
More fixes are coming in ARM64 specific FastISel, but this should cover the
generic problems.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206283 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We had disabled use of TBAA during CodeGen (even when otherwise using AA)
because the ptrtoint/inttoptr used by CGP for address sinking caused BasicAA to
miss basic type punning that it should catch (and, thus, we'd fail to override
TBAA when we should).
However, when AA is in use during CodeGen, CGP now uses normal GEPs and
bitcasts, instead of ptrtoint/inttoptr, when doing address sinking. As a
result, BasicAA should be able to make us do the right thing in the face of
type-punning, and it seems safe to enable use of TBAA again. self-hosting seems
fine on PPC64/Linux on the P7, with TBAA enabled and -misched=shuffle.
Note: We still don't update TBAA when merging stack slots, although because
BasicAA should now catch all such cases, this is no longer a blocking issue.
Nevertheless, I plan to commit code to deal with this properly in the near
future.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206093 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The TargetLowering::expandMUL() helper contains lowering code extracted
from the DAGTypeLegalizer and allows the SelectionDAGLegalizer to expand more
ISD::MUL patterns without having to use a library call.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206037 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This code has been moved to a new function in the TargetLowering
class called expandMUL(). The purpose of this is to be able
to share lowering code between the SelectionDAGLegalize and
DAGTypeLegalizer classes.
No functionality changed intended.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206036 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
FoldConstantArithmetic() only knows how to deal with a few target independent
ISD opcodes. Bail early if it sees a target-specific ISD node. These node do
funny things with operand types which may break the assumptions of the code
that follows, and there's no actual folding that can be done anyway. For example,
non-constant 256 bit vector shifts on X86 have a shift-amount operand that's a
128-bit v4i32 vector regardless of what the first operand type is and that breaks
the assumption that the operand types must match.
rdar://16530923
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@205937 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
sign/zero/any extensions. However a few places were not checking properly the
property of the load and were turning an indexed load into a regular extended
load. Therefore the indexed value was lost during the process and this was
triggering an assertion.
<rdar://problem/16389332>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@205923 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Fixes PR16365 - Extremely slow compilation in -O1 and -O2.
The SD scheduler has a quadratic implementation of load clustering
which absolutely blows up compile time for large blocks with constant
pool loads. The MI scheduler has a better implementation of load
clustering. However, we have not done the work yet to completely
eliminate the SD scheduler. Some benchmarks still seem to benefit from
early load clustering, although maybe by chance.
As an intermediate term fix, I just put a nice limit on the number of
DAG users to search before finding a match. With this limit there are no
binary differences in the LLVM test suite, and the PR16365 test case
does not suffer any compile time impact from this routine.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@205738 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This way, you can check the number of sign bits in the
operands. The depth parameter it already has is pretty useless
without this.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@205649 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When LLVM sees something like (v1iN (vselect v1i1, v1iN, v1iN)) it can
decide that the result is OK (v1i64 is legal on AArch64, for example)
but it still need scalarising because of that v1i1. There was no code
to do this though.
AArch64 and ARM64 have DAG combines to produce efficient code and
prevent that occuring in *most* such situations, but there are edge
cases that they miss. This adds a legalization to cope with that.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@205626 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There were several overlapping problems here, and this solution is
closely inspired by the one adopted in AArch64 in r201381.
Firstly, scalarisation of v1i1 setcc operations simply fails if the
input types are legal. This is fixed in LegalizeVectorTypes.cpp this
time, and allows AArch64 code to be simplified slightly.
Second, vselect with such a setcc feeding into it ends up in
ScalarizeVectorOperand, where it's not handled. I experimented with an
implementation, but found that whatever DAG came out was rather
horrific. I think Hao's DAG combine approach is a good one for
quality, though there are edge cases it won't catch (to be fixed
separately).
Should fix PR19335.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@205625 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
llc doesn't generate nodes for unconditional fall-through branches for targets
without FastISel implementation (X86 has it, but can be disabled by
"-fast-isel=false") in SelectionDAGBuilder::visitBr().
So for line 4 in the following testcase
1: void foo(int i){
2: switch(i){
3: default:
4: break;
5: }
6: return;
7: }
there is no corresponding line in .debug_line section, and a debugger
cannot set a breakpoint at line 4.
Fix this by always emitting a branch when we're not optimizing and add a
testcase to ensure that there's code on every line we'd want to break.
Patch by Daniil Fukalov.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@205529 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This adds the ability to expand large (meaning with more than two unique
defined values) BUILD_VECTOR nodes in terms of SCALAR_TO_VECTOR and (legal)
vector shuffles. There is now no limit of the size we are capable of expanding
this way, although we don't currently do this for vectors with many unique
values because of the default implementation of TLI's
shouldExpandBuildVectorWithShuffles function.
There is currently no functional change to any existing targets because the new
capabilities are not used unless some target overrides the TLI
shouldExpandBuildVectorWithShuffles function. As a result, I've not included a
test case for the new functionality in this commit, but regression tests will
(at least) be added soon when I commit support for the PPC QPX vector
instruction set.
The benefit of committing this now is that it makes the
shouldExpandBuildVectorWithShuffles callback, which had to be added for other
reasons regardless, fully functional. I suspect that other targets will
also benefit from tuning the heuristic.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@205243 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
There are two general methods for expanding a BUILD_VECTOR node:
1. Use SCALAR_TO_VECTOR on the defined scalar values and then shuffle
them together.
2. Build the vector on the stack and then load it.
Currently, we use a fixed heuristic: If there are only one or two unique
defined values, then we attempt an expansion in terms of SCALAR_TO_VECTOR and
vector shuffles (provided that the required shuffle mask is legal). Otherwise,
always expand via the stack. Even when SCALAR_TO_VECTOR is not legal, this
can still be a good idea depending on what tricks the target can play when
lowering the resulting shuffle. If the target can't do anything special,
however, and if SCALAR_TO_VECTOR is expanded via the stack, this heuristic
leads to sub-optimal code (two stack loads instead of one).
Because only the target knows whether the SCALAR_TO_VECTORs and shuffles for a
build vector of a particular type are likely to be optimial, this adds a new
TLI function: shouldExpandBuildVectorWithShuffles which takes the vector type
and the count of unique defined values. If this function returns true, then
method (1) will be used, subject to the constraint that all of the necessary
shuffles are legal (as determined by isShuffleMaskLegal). If this function
returns false, then method (2) is always used.
This commit does not enhance the current code to support expanding a
build_vector with more than two unique values using shuffles, but I'll commit
an implementation of the more-general case shortly.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@205230 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When the loop vectorizer vectorizes code that uses the loop induction variable,
we often end up with IR like this:
%b1 = insertelement <2 x i32> undef, i32 %v, i32 0
%b2 = shufflevector <2 x i32> %b1, <2 x i32> undef, <2 x i32> zeroinitializer
%i = add <2 x i32> %b2, <i32 2, i32 3>
If the add in this example is not legal (as is the case on PPC with VSX), it
will be scalarized, and we'll end up with a number of extract_vector_elt nodes
with the vector shuffle as the input operand, and that vector shuffle is fed by
one or more build_vector nodes. By the time that vector operations are
expanded, visitEXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT will not create new extract_vector_elt by
looking through the vector shuffle (to make sure that no illegal operations are
created), and so the extract_vector_elt -> vector shuffle -> build_vector is
never simplified to an operand of the build vector.
By looking at build_vectors through a shuffle we fix this particular situation,
preventing a vector from being built, only to be deconstructed again (for the
scalarized add) -- an expensive proposition when this all needs to be done via
the stack. We probably want a more comprehensive fix here where we look back
recursively through any shuffles to any build_vectors or scalar_to_vectors,
etc. but that can come later.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@205179 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
When expanding EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT and EXTRACT_SUBVECTOR using
SelectionDAGLegalize::ExpandExtractFromVectorThroughStack, we store the entire
vector and then load the piece we want. This is fine in isolation, but
generating a new store (and corresponding stack slot) for each extraction ends
up producing code of poor quality. When we scalarize a vector operation (using
SelectionDAG::UnrollVectorOp for example) we generate one EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT
for each element in the vector. This used to generate one stored copy of the
vector for each element in the vector. Now we search the uses of the vector for
a suitable store before generating a new one, which results in much more
efficient scalarization code.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@205153 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This adds back r204781.
Original message:
Aliases are just another name for a position in a file. As such, the
regular symbol resolutions are not applied. For example, given
define void @my_func() {
ret void
}
@my_alias = alias weak void ()* @my_func
@my_alias2 = alias void ()* @my_alias
We produce without this patch:
.weak my_alias
my_alias = my_func
.globl my_alias2
my_alias2 = my_alias
That is, in the resulting ELF file my_alias, my_func and my_alias are
just 3 names pointing to offset 0 of .text. That is *not* the
semantics of IR linking. For example, linking in a
@my_alias = alias void ()* @other_func
would require the strong my_alias to override the weak one and
my_alias2 would end up pointing to other_func.
There is no way to represent that with aliases being just another
name, so the best solution seems to be to just disallow it, converting
a miscompile into an error.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@204934 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Implementing the LLVM part of the call to __builtin___clear_cache
which translates into an intrinsic @llvm.clear_cache and is lowered
by each target, either to a call to __clear_cache or nothing at all
incase the caches are unified.
Updating LangRef and adding some tests for the implemented architectures.
Other archs will have to implement the method in case this builtin
has to be compiled for it, since the default behaviour is to bail
unimplemented.
A Clang patch is required for the builtin to be lowered into the
llvm intrinsic. This will be done next.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@204802 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r204781.
I will follow up to with msan folks to see what is what they
were trying to do with aliases to weak aliases.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@204784 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Aliases are just another name for a position in a file. As such, the
regular symbol resolutions are not applied. For example, given
define void @my_func() {
ret void
}
@my_alias = alias weak void ()* @my_func
@my_alias2 = alias void ()* @my_alias
We produce without this patch:
.weak my_alias
my_alias = my_func
.globl my_alias2
my_alias2 = my_alias
That is, in the resulting ELF file my_alias, my_func and my_alias are
just 3 names pointing to offset 0 of .text. That is *not* the
semantics of IR linking. For example, linking in a
@my_alias = alias void ()* @other_func
would require the strong my_alias to override the weak one and
my_alias2 would end up pointing to other_func.
There is no way to represent that with aliases being just another
name, so the best solution seems to be to just disallow it, converting
a miscompile into an error.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@204781 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Usually opaque constants shouldn't be folded, unless they are simple unary
operations that don't create new constants. Although this shouldn't drop the
opaque constant flag. This commit fixes this.
Related to <rdar://problem/14774662>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@204737 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
If GT/UGT or LT/ULT were set to expand, a comparison
with a constant would replace it with the illegal
cond code.
There are several more places later in this function that
will have the same basic problem.
Theoretically R600 should hit this problem for a test,
but for some reason it doesn't.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@204727 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
And vice-versa, as long as the types are the same width.
There are a few R600 tests that will cover this.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@204616 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch renames method 'isConstantSplat' as 'getConstantSplatValue'
(mainly for consistency reasons), and rewrites its logic to ensure
that we always perform a legal 'cast<ConstantSDNode>'.
Added test shift-combine-crash.ll to verify that DAGCombiner no longer crashes with an assertion failure in the attempt to simplify a vector shift by a vector of all undef counts.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@204536 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Rather than LegalizeAction::Expand, this needs LegalizeAction::Promote to get
promoted to fp_to_sint v8f32->v8i32. This is a legal operation on AVX.
For that to work properly, we also need to teach the legalizer about the
specific promotion required here. The default vector promotion uses
bitcasting to a vector type of the same total size. We want to promote the
vector element type, effectively widening the operation and then truncating
the result. This is analogous to the current logic of how int_to_fp is
promoted.
The change also factors out some code from the int_to_fp promotion code to
ValueType::widenIntegerVectorElementType. This is now shared between
int_to_fp and fp_to_int.
There is no longer need for the custom lowering of fp_to_sint f32->v8i16 in
X86. It can now go through the new target-independent fp_to_*int promotion
logic.
I also checked that no other target uses Promote for these ops yet, so there
shouldn't be any unexpected change in behavior.
Fixes <rdar://problem/16202247>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@204058 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
operator* on the by-operand iterators to return a MachineOperand& rather than
a MachineInstr&. At this point they almost behave like normal iterators!
Again, this requires making some existing loops more verbose, but should pave
the way for the big range-based for-loop cleanups in the future.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203865 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
for use with C++11 range-based for-loops.
The gist of phase 1 is to remove the skipInstruction() and skipBundle()
methods from these iterators, instead splitting each iterator into a version
that walks operands, a version that walks instructions, and a version that
walks bundles. This has the result of making some "clever" loops in lib/CodeGen
more verbose, but also makes their iterator invalidation characteristics much
more obvious to the casual reader. (Making them concise again in the future is a
good motivating case for a pre-incrementing range adapter!)
Phase 2 of this undertaking with consist of removing the getOperand() method,
and changing operator*() of the operand-walker to return a MachineOperand&. At
that point, it should be possible to add range views for them that work as one
might expect.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203757 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The syntax for "cmpxchg" should now look something like:
cmpxchg i32* %addr, i32 42, i32 3 acquire monotonic
where the second ordering argument gives the required semantics in the case
that no exchange takes place. It should be no stronger than the first ordering
constraint and cannot be either "release" or "acq_rel" (since no store will
have taken place).
rdar://problem/15996804
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203559 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
opaque.
Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.
The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.
However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is already done for shifts. Allow it for rotations as well. E.g.:
(rotl:i32 x, (trunc (and y, 31))) -> (rotl:i32 x, (and (trunc y), 31))
Use the newly factored-out distributeTruncateThroughAnd.
With this patch and some X86.td tweaks we should be able to remove redundant
masking of the rotation amount like in the example above. HW implicitly
performs this masking.
The testcase will be added as part of the X86 patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203316 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is the new idiom:
x<<(y&31) | x>>((0-y)&31)
which is recognized as:
x ROTL (y&31)
The change refines matchRotateSub. In
Neg & (OpSize - 1) == (OpSize - Pos) & (OpSize - 1), if Pos is
Pos' & (OpSize - 1) we can just use Pos' instead of Pos.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@203315 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
