6502/llvm-6502
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git synced 2025-01-26 23:32:58 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity
107,113 Commits 39 Branches 0 Tags
Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Evgeniy Stepanov
58a20d70fa [asan] Fix coverage instrumentation with -asan-globals=0. 
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@210103 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
 2014-06-03 14:16:00 +00:00
Evgeniy Stepanov
0949668398 [asancov] Don't emit extra runtime calls when compiling without coverage. 
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209721 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
 2014-05-28 09:26:46 +00:00
Evgeniy Stepanov
18b6fb9612 [asancov] Emit an initializer passing number of coverage code locations in each module. 
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@209654 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
 2014-05-27 12:39:31 +00:00
Kostya Serebryany
40a9c0f58b [asan] one more workaround for PR17409: don't do BB-level coverage instrumentation if there are more than N (=1500) basic blocks. This makes ASanCoverage work on libjpeg_turbo/jchuff.c used by Chrome, which has 1824 BBs 
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@206564 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
 2014-04-18 08:02:42 +00:00
Alexander Potapenko
90844c4778 [ASan] Add -asan-module to the ASan .ll tests. 
After the -asan pass had been split into -asan (function-level) and -asan-module (module-level) some of the
tests have silently stopped working, because they didn't instrument the globals anymore.
We've decided to have every test using both passes, irrespective of the presence of globals in it.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@204335 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
 2014-03-20 11:16:34 +00:00
Kostya Serebryany
bd2c711cdd [asan] extend asan-coverage (still experimental). 
- add a mode for collecting per-block coverage (-asan-coverage=2).
   So far the implementation is naive (all blocks are instrumented),
   the performance overhead on top of asan could be as high as 30%.
 - Make sure the one-time calls to __sanitizer_cov are moved to function buttom,
   which in turn required to copy the original debug info into the call insn.

Here is the performance data on SPEC 2006
(train data, comparing asan with asan-coverage={0,1,2}):

                             asan+cov0     asan+cov1      diff 0-1    asan+cov2       diff 0-2      diff 1-2
       400.perlbench,        65.60,        65.80,         1.00,        76.20,         1.16,         1.16
           401.bzip2,        65.10,        65.50,         1.01,        75.90,         1.17,         1.16
             403.gcc,         1.64,         1.69,         1.03,         2.04,         1.24,         1.21
             429.mcf,        21.90,        22.60,         1.03,        23.20,         1.06,         1.03
           445.gobmk,       166.00,       169.00,         1.02,       205.00,         1.23,         1.21
           456.hmmer,        88.30,        87.90,         1.00,        91.00,         1.03,         1.04
           458.sjeng,       210.00,       222.00,         1.06,       258.00,         1.23,         1.16
      462.libquantum,         1.73,         1.75,         1.01,         2.11,         1.22,         1.21
         464.h264ref,       147.00,       152.00,         1.03,       160.00,         1.09,         1.05
         471.omnetpp,       115.00,       116.00,         1.01,       140.00,         1.22,         1.21
           473.astar,       133.00,       131.00,         0.98,       142.00,         1.07,         1.08
       483.xalancbmk,       118.00,       120.00,         1.02,       154.00,         1.31,         1.28
            433.milc,        19.80,        20.00,         1.01,        20.10,         1.02,         1.01
            444.namd,        16.20,        16.20,         1.00,        17.60,         1.09,         1.09
          447.dealII,        41.80,        42.20,         1.01,        43.50,         1.04,         1.03
          450.soplex,         7.51,         7.82,         1.04,         8.25,         1.10,         1.05
          453.povray,        14.00,        14.40,         1.03,        15.80,         1.13,         1.10
             470.lbm,        33.30,        34.10,         1.02,        34.10,         1.02,         1.00
         482.sphinx3,        12.40,        12.30,         0.99,        13.00,         1.05,         1.06


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@199488 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
 2014-01-17 11:00:30 +00:00
Bob Wilson
4b8991424a Reapply "[asan] Poor man's coverage that works with ASan" 
I was able to successfully run a bootstrapped LTO build of clang with
r194701, so this change does not seem to be the cause of our failing
buildbots.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194789 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
 2013-11-15 07:16:09 +00:00
Bob Wilson
2475da80ed Revert "[asan] Poor man's coverage that works with ASan" 
This reverts commit 194701. Apple's bootstrapped LTO builds have been failing,
and this change (along with compiler-rt 194702-194704) is the only thing on
the blamelist.  I will either reappy these changes or help debug the problem,
depending on whether this fixes the buildbots.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194780 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
 2013-11-15 03:28:22 +00:00
Kostya Serebryany
8cc5f7cd59 [asan] Poor man's coverage that works with ASan 
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194701 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
 2013-11-14 13:27:41 +00:00