cost modeling for if-conversion. Now if only we had a way to estimate the misprediction probability.
Adjsut CodeGen/ARM/ifcvt10.ll. The pipeline on Cortex-A8 is long enough that it is still profitable
to predicate an ldm, but the shorter pipeline on Cortex-A9 makes it unprofitable.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@114995 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Rather than having arbitrary cutoffs, actually try to cost model the conversion.
For now, the constants are tuned to more or less match our existing behavior, but these will be
changed to reflect realistic values as this work proceeds.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@114973 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
register pressure and thus excess spills, which we don't currently recover from well. This should
be re-evaluated in the future if our ability to generate good spills/splits improves.
Partial fix for <rdar://problem/7635585>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@114919 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Splitting critical edges at the merge point only addressed part of the issue; it is also possible for non-post-domination
to occur when the path from the load to the merge has branches in it. Unfortunately, full anticipation analysis is
time-consuming, so for now approximate it. This is strictly more conservative than real anticipation, so we will miss
some cases that real PRE would allow, but we also no longer insert loads into paths where they didn't exist before. :-)
This is a very slight net positive on SPEC for me (0.5% on average). Most of the benchmarks are largely unaffected, but
when it pays off it pays off decently: 181.mcf improves by 4.5% on my machine.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@114785 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the predicate to discover the number of sign bits. Enhance X86's target lowering to provide
a useful response to this query.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@114473 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
(sbbl x, x) sets the registers to 0 or ~0. Combined with two's complement arithmetic, we can fold
the intermediate AND and the ADD into a single SUB.
This fixes <rdar://problem/8449754>.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@114460 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
CombinerAA cannot assume that different FrameIndex's never alias, but can instead use
MachineFrameInfo to get the actual offsets of these slots and check for actual aliasing.
This fixes CodeGen/X86/2010-02-19-TailCallRetAddrBug.ll and CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll
when CombinerAA is enabled, modulo a different register allocation sequence.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@114348 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
NO path to the destination containing side effects, not that SOME path contains no side effects.
In practice, this only manifests with CombinerAA enabled, because otherwise the chain has little
to no branching, so "any" is effectively equivalent to "all".
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@114268 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
more careful not to call SimplifyInstructionsInBlock() on an unreachable block, the issue has been fixed at a higher level. Add
a big warning to SimplifyInstructionsInBlock() to hopefully prevent this in the future.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@114117 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a Constant into a ConstantRange. Handle this conservatively for now, rather than asserting. The testcase is
more complex that I would like, but the manifestation of the problem is sensitive to iteration orders and the state of the
LVI cache, and I have not been able to reproduce it with manually constructed or simplified cases.
Fixes PR8162.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@114103 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
be possible to implement this very carefully to allow a lock-free implementation while still
avoiding illegal interleavings, but I haven't been able to figure one out.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@114046 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
that all the setup of this class currently happens at static initialization time, this misses the fact
that some later events can cause mutation of the PassRegistrationListeners list, and thus cause race issues.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@114036 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
to expose greater opportunities for store narrowing in codegen. This patch fixes a potential
infinite loop in instcombine caused by one of the introduced transforms being overly aggressive.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@113763 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This can result in increased opportunities for store narrowing in code generation. Update a number of
tests for this change. This fixes <rdar://problem/8285027>.
Additionally, because this inverts the order of ors and ands, some patterns for optimizing or-of-and-of-or
no longer fire in instances where they did originally. Add a simple transform which recaptures most of these
opportunities: if we have an or-of-constant-or and have failed to fold away the inner or, commute the order
of the two ors, to give the non-constant or a chance for simplification instead.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@113679 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
not unrolling loops that contain calls that would be better off getting inlined. This mostly
comes up when an interleaved devirtualization pass has devirtualized a call which the inliner
will inline on a future pass. Thus, rather than blocking all loops containing calls, add
a metric for "inline candidate calls" and block loops containing those instead.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@113535 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
don't use any InlineCostAnalyzer state, and are useful for other clients who don't necessarily want to use
all of InlineCostAnalyzer's logic, some of which is fairly inlining-specific.
No intended functionality change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@113499 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
unrolling threshold to the optimize-for-size threshold. Basically, for loops containing calls, unrolling
can still be profitable as long as the loop is REALLY small.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@113439 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
modules are instantiated in them. If the context is deleted, all of its owned
modules are also deleted.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@113374 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The threshold value of 50 is arbitrary, and I chose it simply by analogy to the inlining thresholds, where
the baseline unrolling threshold is slightly smaller than the baseline inlining threshold. This could
undoubtedly use some tuning.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@113306 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
switch to using a ManagedStatic for the global PassRegistry instead of a
ManagedCleanup, and fix a destruction ordering bug this exposed.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@113283 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I have not been able to find a way to test each in isolation, for a few reasons:
1) The ability to look-through non-i1 BinaryOperator's requires the ability to look through non-constant
ICmps in order for it to ever trigger.
2) The ability to do LVI-powered PHI value determination only matters in cases that ProcessBranchOnPHI
can't handle. Since it already handles all the cases without other instructions in the def-use chain
between the PHI and the branch, it requires the ability to look through ICmps and/or BinaryOperators
as well.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@112611 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This actually exposed an infinite recursion bug in ComputeValueKnownInPredecessors which theoretically already existed (in JumpThreading's
handling of and/or of i1's), but never manifested before. This patch adds a tracking set to prevent this case.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@112589 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Unfortunately, the only testcase I have for this is huge and doesn't reduce well because the error is
sensitive to iteration-order issues, since the problem only occurs when merging values in a particular order.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@112489 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
any load in the default address space that completes implies that the base value that it GEP'd from
was not null.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@112015 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Owen Anderson