reassociation. No testcase, because I wasn't able to create a testcase
which actually demonstrates a problem.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@124713 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
benchmarks, and that it can be simplified to X/Y. (In general you can only
simplify (Z*Y)/Y to Z if the multiplication did not overflow; if Z has the
form "X/Y" then this is the case). This patch implements that transform and
moves some Div logic out of instcombine and into InstructionSimplify.
Unfortunately instcombine gets in the way somewhat, since it likes to change
(X/Y)*Y into X-(X rem Y), so I had to teach instcombine about this too.
Finally, thanks to the NSW/NUW flags, sometimes we know directly that "Z*Y"
does not overflow, because the flag says so, so I added that logic too. This
eliminates a bunch of divisions and subtractions in 447.dealII, and has good
effects on some other benchmarks too. It seems to have quite an effect on
tramp3d-v4 but it's hard to say if it's good or bad because inlining decisions
changed, resulting in massive changes all over.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@124487 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
clang's -Wuninitialized-experimental warning.
While these don't look like real bugs, clang's
-Wuninitialized-experimental analysis is stricter
than GCC's, and these fixes have the benefit
of being general nice cleanups.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@124073 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
A == B, and A > B, does not mean we can fold it to true. We still need to
check for A ? B (A unordered B).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123993 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
a select. A vector select is pairwise on each element so we'd need a new
condition with the right number of elements to select on. Fixes PR8994.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123963 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
auto-simplier the transform most missed by early-cse is (zext X) != 0 -> X != 0.
This patch adds this transform and some related logic to InstructionSimplify
and removes some of the logic from instcombine (unfortunately not all because
there are several situations in which instcombine can improve things by making
new instructions, whereas instsimplify is not allowed to do this). At -O2 this
often results in more than 15% more simplifications by early-cse, and results in
hundreds of lines of bitcode being eliminated from the testsuite. I did see some
small negative effects in the testsuite, for example a few additional instructions
in three programs. One program, 483.xalancbmk, got an additional 35 instructions,
which seems to be due to a function getting an additional instruction and then
being inlined all over the place.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123911 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
multiple uses. In some cases, all the uses are the same operation,
so instcombine can go ahead and promote the phi. In the testcase
this pushes an add out of the loop.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123568 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
While there, I noticed that the transform "undef >>a X -> undef" was wrong.
For example if X is 2 then the top two bits must be equal, so the result can
not be anything. I fixed this in the constant folder as well. Also, I made
the transform for "X << undef" stronger: it now folds to undef always, even
though X might be zero. This is in accordance with the LangRef, but I must
admit that it is fairly aggressive. Also, I added "i32 X << 32 -> undef"
following the LangRef and the constant folder, likewise fairly aggressive.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123417 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
X = sext x; x >s c ? X : C+1 --> X = sext x; X <s C+1 ? C+1 : X
X = sext x; x <s c ? X : C-1 --> X = sext x; X >s C-1 ? C-1 : X
X = zext x; x >u c ? X : C+1 --> X = zext x; X <u C+1 ? C+1 : X
X = zext x; x <u c ? X : C-1 --> X = zext x; X >u C-1 ? C-1 : X
X = sext x; x >u c ? X : C+1 --> X = sext x; X <u C+1 ? C+1 : X
X = sext x; x <u c ? X : C-1 --> X = sext x; X >u C-1 ? C-1 : X
Instead of calculating this with mixed types promote all to the
larger type. This enables scalar evolution to analyze this
expression. PR8866
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@123034 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
if both A op B and A op C simplify. This fires fairly often but doesn't
make that much difference. On gcc-as-one-file it removes two "and"s and
turns one branch into a select.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122399 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This resolves a README entry and technically resolves PR4916,
but we still get poor code for the testcase in that PR because
GVN isn't CSE'ing uadd with add, filed as PR8817.
Previously we got:
_test7: ## @test7
addq %rsi, %rdi
cmpq %rdi, %rsi
movl $42, %eax
cmovaq %rsi, %rax
ret
Now we get:
_test7: ## @test7
addq %rsi, %rdi
movl $42, %eax
cmovbq %rsi, %rax
ret
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@122182 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
