"private" symbols which the assember shouldn't strip, but which the linker may
remove after evaluation. This is mostly useful for Objective-C metadata.
This is plumbing, so we don't have a use of it yet. More to come, etc.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@76385 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
being more consistent with other backends, this makes the SPARC backend
deal with functions with arguments with illegal types correctly, which
fixes some tests in test/CodeGen/Generic.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@76375 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Inline asm instructions may have additional <imp-def,kill> register operands.
These operands are not marked with a flag like the normal asm operands, so we
must not assert that there is a flag.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@76373 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
return the smallest union of two ranges instead of just any range that happens
to contain the union.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@76360 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
copied from the SystemZ target. I don't think this causes any
significant changes to the output (I compared the assembly, and the
results appeared to be essentially unchanged), although I don't actually
have an Alpha to test on.
I would appreciate if anyone with the appropriate hardware could test
this. I'm not sure if that includes anyone subscribed to llvm-commits,
though.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@76353 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- We should canonicalize this and get rid of the cmake and llvm-config hacks to
support both variants.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@76350 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- Shouldn't really be necessary, but currently .inc files get included into
some main target headers.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@76349 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
insertelement/extractelement.
I'm not entirely sure this is precisely what we want to do: should we
prefer bitcast(insertelement) or insertelement(bitcast)? Similarly. should we
prefer extractelement(bitcast) or bitcast(extractelement)?
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@76345 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
all values belonging to the intersection will belong to the resulting range.
The former was inconsistent about that point (either way is fine, just pick
one.) This is part of PR4545.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@76289 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
which cannot be folded even if they have constant operands. Significantly
helps if_spppsubr.c attached to PR4573.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@76285 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
ConstantExpr and Instruction. This involves duplicating some code
between GetElementPtrInst and GEPOperator, but it's not a lot.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@76265 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
GEPOperator's hasNoPointer0verflow(), and make a few places in instcombine
that create GEPs that may overflow clear the NoOverflow value. Among
other things, this partially addresses PR2831.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@76252 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
