This bug only bit the C++98 build bots because all of the actual uses
really do move. ;] But not *quite* ready to do the whole C++11 switch
yet, so clean it up. Also add a unit test that catches this immediately.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194548 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
more smarts in it. This is where most of the interesting logic that used
to live in the implicit-scheduling-hackery of the old pass manager will
live.
Like the previous commits, note that this is a very early prototype!
I expect substantial changes before this is ready to use.
The core of the design is the following:
- We have an AnalysisManager which can be used across a series of
passes over a module.
- The code setting up a pass pipeline registers the analyses available
with the manager.
- Individual transform passes can check than an analysis manager
provides the analyses they require in order to fail-fast.
- There is *no* implicit registration or scheduling.
- Analysis passes are different from other passes: they produce an
analysis result that is cached and made available via the analysis
manager.
- Cached results are invalidated automatically by the pass managers.
- When a transform pass requests an analysis result, either the analysis
is run to produce the result or a cached result is provided.
There are a few aspects of this design that I *know* will change in
subsequent commits:
- Currently there is no "preservation" system, that needs to be added.
- All of the analysis management should move up to the analysis library.
- The analysis management needs to support at least SCC passes. Maybe
loop passes. Living in the analysis library will facilitate this.
- Need support for analyses which are *both* module and function passes.
- Need support for pro-actively running module analyses to have cached
results within a function pass manager.
- Need a clear design for "immutable" passes.
- Need support for requesting cached results when available and not
re-running the pass even if that would be necessary.
- Need more thorough testing of all of this infrastructure.
There are other aspects that I view as open questions I'm hoping to
resolve as I iterate a bit on the infrastructure, and especially as
I start writing actual passes against this.
- Should we have separate management layers for function, module, and
SCC analyses? I think "yes", but I'm not yet ready to switch the code.
Adding SCC support will likely resolve this definitively.
- How should the 'require' functionality work? Should *that* be the only
way to request results to ensure that passes always require things?
- How should preservation work?
- Probably some other things I'm forgetting. =]
Look forward to more patches in shorter order now that this is in place.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194538 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Add user-supplied C runtime and compiler-rt library functions to
llvm.compiler.used to protect them from premature optimization by
passes like -globalopt and -ipsccp. Calls to (seemingly unused)
runtime library functions can be added by -instcombine and instruction
lowering.
Patch by Duncan Exon Smith, thanks!
Fixes <rdar://problem/14740087>
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194514 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This reverts commit r194485.
The variable is unused in some macro instantiations, but not others. We should
probably fix clang to not warn on this.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194486 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This will enable the PBQP register allocator to provide its own normalizing function.
No functionnal change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194417 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Besides, this relates it more obviously to the VirtRegAuxInfo::calculateSpillWeightAndHint.
No functionnal change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194404 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Based on discussions with Lang Hames and Jakob Stoklund Olesen at the hacker's lab, and in the light of upcoming work on the PBQP register allocator, it was though that CalcSpillWeights does not need to be a pass. This change will enable to customize / tune the spill weight computation depending on the allocator.
Update the documentation style while there.
No functionnal change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194356 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This is still just a skeleton. I'm trying to pull together the
experimentation I've done into committable chunks, and this is the first
coherent one. Others will follow in hopefully short order that move this
more toward a useful initial implementation. I still expect the design
to continue evolving in small ways as I work through the different
requirements and features needed here though.
Keep in mind, all of this is off by default.
Currently, this mostly exercises the use of a polymorphic smart pointer
and templates to hide the polymorphism for the pass manager from the
pass implementation. The next step will be more significant, adding the
first framework of analysis support.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194325 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
give the files a legacy prefix in the right directory. Use forwarding
headers in the old locations to paper over the name change for most
clients during the transitional period.
No functionality changed here! This is just clearing some space to
reduce renaming churn later on with a new system.
Even when the new stuff starts to go in, it is going to be hidden behind
a flag and off-by-default as it is still WIP and under development.
This patch is specifically designed so that very little out-of-tree code
has to change. I'm going to work as hard as I can to keep that the case.
Only direct forward declarations of the PassManager class are impacted
by this change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194324 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
unique ownership smart pointer which is *deep* copyable by assuming it
can call a T::clone() method to allocate a copy of the owned data.
This is mostly useful with containers or other collections of uniquely
owned data in C++98 where they *might* copy. With C++11 we can likely
remove this in favor of move-only types and containers wrapped around
those types.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194315 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This patch moves the jump address materialization inside the noop slide. This
enables patching of the materialization itself or its complete removal. This
patch also adds the ability to define scratch registers that can be used safely
by the code called from the patchpoint intrinsic. At least one scratch register
is required, because that one is used for the materialization of the jump
address. This patch depends on D2009.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2074
Reviewed by Andy
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194306 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The new graph structure replaces the node and edge linked lists with vectors.
Free lists (well, free vectors) are used for fast insertion/deletion.
The ultimate aim is to make PBQP graphs cheap to clone. The motivation is that
the PBQP solver destructively consumes input graphs while computing a solution,
forcing the graph to be fully reconstructed for each round of PBQP. This
imposes a high cost on large functions, which often require several rounds of
solving/spilling to find a final register allocation. If we can cheaply clone
the PBQP graph and incrementally update it between rounds then hopefully we can
reduce this cost. Further, once we begin pooling matrix/vector values (future
work), we can cache some PBQP solver metadata and share it between cloned
graphs, allowing the PBQP solver to re-use some of the computation done in
earlier rounds.
For now this is just a data structure update. The allocator and solver still
use the graph the same way as before, fully reconstructing it between each
round. I expect no material change from this update, although it may change
the iteration order of the nodes, causing ties in the solver to break in
different directions, and this could perturb the generated allocations
(hopefully in a completely benign way).
Thanks very much to Arnaud Allard de Grandmaison for encouraging me to get back
to work on this, and for a lot of discussion and many useful PBQP test cases.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194300 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The idea of the AnyReg Calling Convention is to provide the call arguments in
registers, but not to force them to be placed in a paticular order into a
specified set of registers. Instead it is up tp the register allocator to assign
any register as it sees fit. The same applies to the return value (if
applicable).
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2009
Reviewed by Andy
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194293 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Based on discussions with Lang Hames and Jakob Stoklund Olesen at the hacker's lab, and in the light of upcoming work on the PBQP register allocator, it was though that CalcSpillWeights does not need to be a pass. This change will enable to customize / tune the spill weight computation depending on the allocator.
Update the documentation style while there.
No functionnal change.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194269 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
