Summary:
Make use of isAtLeastRelease/Acquire in the ARM/AArch64 backends
These helper functions are introduced in D4844.
Depends D4844
Test Plan: make check-all passes
Reviewers: jfb
Subscribers: aemerson, llvm-commits, mcrosier, reames
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4937
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@215902 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This allows the AArch64 backend to handle fadd, fsub, fmul and fdiv
operations on f16 (half-precision) types by promoting to f32.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@215891 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Externally-defined functions with weak linkage should not be
tail-called on ARM or AArch64, as the AAELF spec requires normal calls
to undefined weak functions to be replaced with a NOP or jump to the
next instruction. The behaviour of branch instructions in this
situation (as used for tail calls) is implementation-defined, so we
cannot rely on the linker replacing the tail call with a return.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@215890 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
ARM in particular is getting dangerously close to exceeding 32 bits worth of
possible subtarget features. When this happens, various parts of MC start to
fail inexplicably as masks get truncated to "unsigned".
Mostly just refactoring at present, and there's probably no way to test.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@215887 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Simply indicate the functions that are part of the runtime library that we do
not setup libcalls for. This is merely for ease of identification. NFC.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@215863 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
The set of functions defined in the RTABI was separated for no real reason.
This brings us closer to proper utilisation of the functions defined by the
RTABI. It also sets the ground for correctly emitting function calls to AEABI
functions on all AEABI conforming platforms.
The previously existing lie on the behaviour of __ldivmod and __uldivmod is
propagated as it is beyond the scope of the change.
The changes to the test are due to the fact that we now use the divmod functions
which return both the quotient and remainder and thus we no longer need to
invoke two functions on Linux (making it closer to EABI's behaviour).
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@215862 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It causes a number of regressions when -fintegrated-as is enabled. This happens
because there are codegen-only instructions that incorrectly uses the first
operand as the encoding for the $fcc register. The regressions do not occur when
-via-file-asm is also given.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@215847 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
This was a thinko. The intent was to flip the explicit bits that need toggling
rather than all bits. This would result in incorrect behaviour (which now is
tested).
Thanks to Nico Weber for pointing this out!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@215846 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We already handle the no-slabs case when checking whether the current slab
is large enough: if no slabs have been allocated, CurPtr and End are both 0.
alignPtr(0), will still be 0, and so "if (Ptr + Size <= End)" fails.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4943
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@215841 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
It should remove dosens of lines in handling instrinsics (in a huge switch) and give an easy way to add new intrinsics.
I did not completed to move al intrnsics to the table, I'll do this in the upcomming commits.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@215826 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
While this might seem like an obvious canonicalization, there is one subtle problem with it. The result of the original expression
is undef when x is NaN (remember, fast math flags), but the result of the select is always defined when x is NaN. This means that the
new expression is strictly more defined than the original one. One unfortunate consequence of this is that the transform is not reversible!
It's always legal to make increase the defined-ness of an expression, but it's not legal to reduce it. Thus, targets that prefer the original
form of the expression cannot reverse the transform to recover it. Another way to think of it is that the transform has lost source-level
information (the fast math flags), which is undesirable.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@215825 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I'm using this to try to find more minimal test cases by re-fuzzing
within a specific domain once errors are found.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@215823 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
While *most* (X sdiv 1) operations will get caught by InstSimplify, it
is still possible for a sdiv to appear in the worklist which hasn't been
simplified yet.
This means that it is possible for 0 - (X sdiv 1) to get transformed
into (X sdiv -1); dividing by -1 can make the transform produce undef
values instead of the proper result.
Sorry for the lack of testcase, it's a bit problematic because it relies
on the exact order of operations in the worklist.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@215818 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
