When trying to eliminate an "sub sp, sp, #N" instruction by folding
it into an existing push/pop using dummy registers, we need to account
for the fact that this might affect precisely how "fp" gets set in the
prologue.
We were attempting this, but assuming that *whenever* we performed a
fold it would make a difference. This is false, for example, in:
push {r4, r7, lr}
add fp, sp, #4
vpush {d8}
sub sp, sp, #8
we can fold the "sub" into the "vpush", forming "vpush {d7, d8}".
However, in that case the "add fp" instruction mustn't change, which
we were getting wrong before.
Should fix PR18160.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196725 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
We were trying to fold the stack adjustment into the wrong instruction in the
situation where the entire basic-block was epilogue code. Really, it can only
ever be valid to do the folding precisely where the "add sp, ..." would be
placed so there's no need for a separate iterator to track that.
Should fix PR18136.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196493 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Previously, we clobbered callee-saved registers when folding an "add
sp, #N" into a "pop {rD, ...}" instruction. This change checks whether
a register we're going to add to the "pop" could actually be live
outside the function before doing so and should fix the issue.
This should fix PR18081.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@196046 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
ARM prologues usually look like:
push {r7, lr}
sub sp, sp, #4
If code size is extremely important, this can be optimised to the single
instruction:
push {r6, r7, lr}
where we don't actually care about the contents of r6, but pushing it subtracts
4 from sp as a side effect.
This should implement such a conversion, predicated on the "minsize" function
attribute (-Oz) since I've yet to find any code it actually makes faster.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@194264 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
