at more than those which define CPSR. You can have this situation:
(1) subs ...
(2) sub r6, r5, r4
(3) movge ...
(4) cmp r6, 0
(5) movge ...
We cannot convert (2) to "subs" because (3) is using the CPSR set by
(1). There's an analogous situation here:
(1) sub r1, r2, r3
(2) sub r4, r5, r6
(3) cmp r4, ...
(5) movge ...
(6) cmp r1, ...
(7) movge ...
We cannot convert (1) to "subs" because of the intervening use of CPSR.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@117950 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
operand and one of them has a single use that is a live out copy, favor the
one that is live out. Otherwise it will be difficult to eliminate the copy
if the instruction is a loop induction variable update. e.g.
BB:
sub r1, r3, #1
str r0, [r2, r3]
mov r3, r1
cmp
bne BB
=>
BB:
str r0, [r2, r3]
sub r3, r3, #1
cmp
bne BB
This fixed the recent 256.bzip2 regression.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@117675 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
- For now, loads of [r, r] addressing mode is the same as the
[r, r lsl/lsr/asr #] variants. ARMBaseInstrInfo::getOperandLatency() should
identify the former case and reduce the output latency by 1.
- Also identify [r, r << 2] case. This special form of shifter addressing mode
is "free".
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@117519 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
the LDR instructions have. This makes the literal/register forms of the
instructions explicit and allows us to assign scheduling itineraries
appropriately. rdar://8477752
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@117505 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
explicit about the operands. Split out the different variants into separate
instructions. This gives us the ability to, among other things, assign
different scheduling itineraries to the variants. rdar://8477752.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@117409 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
"long latency" enough to hoist even if it may increase spilling. Reloading
a value from spill slot is often cheaper than performing an expensive
computation in the loop. For X86, that means machine LICM will hoist
SQRT, DIV, etc. ARM will be somewhat aggressive with VFP and NEON
instructions.
- Enable register pressure aware machine LICM by default.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@116781 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
allow target to correctly compute latency for cases where static scheduling
itineraries isn't sufficient. e.g. variable_ops instructions such as
ARM::ldm.
This also allows target without scheduling itineraries to compute operand
latencies. e.g. X86 can return (approximated) latencies for high latency
instructions such as division.
- Compute operand latencies for those defined by load multiple instructions,
e.g. ldm and those used by store multiple instructions, e.g. stm.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@115755 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
stick with a constant estimate of 90% (branch predictors are good!), but we might find that we want to provide
more nuanced estimates in the future.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@115364 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
cost modeling for if-conversion. Now if only we had a way to estimate the misprediction probability.
Adjsut CodeGen/ARM/ifcvt10.ll. The pipeline on Cortex-A8 is long enough that it is still profitable
to predicate an ldm, but the shorter pipeline on Cortex-A9 makes it unprofitable.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@114995 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Rather than having arbitrary cutoffs, actually try to cost model the conversion.
For now, the constants are tuned to more or less match our existing behavior, but these will be
changed to reflect realistic values as this work proceeds.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@114973 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
I am unable to write a test for this case, help is solicited, though...
What I did is to tickle the code in the debugger and verify that we do the right thing.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@114430 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
into OptimizeCompareInstr.
This necessitates the passing of CmpValue around,
so widen the virtual functions to accomodate.
No functionality changes.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@114428 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Recognize VLD1q64Pseudo as a stack slot load.
Reject these if they are loading or storing a subregister. The API (and
VirtRegRewriter) doesn't know how to deal with that.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@113985 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
encountered while building llvm-gcc for arm. This is probably the same issue
that the ppc buildbot hit. llvm::prior works on a MachineBasicBlock::iterator,
not a plain MachineInstr.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@113983 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
backing out following to get it back to green,
so I can investigate in peace:
svn merge -c -113840 llvm/test/CodeGen/ARM/arm-and-tst-peephole.ll
svn merge -c -113876 -c -113839 llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMBaseInstrInfo.cpp
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@113980 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
by morphing the 'and' to its recording form 'andS'.
This is basically a test commit into this area, to
see whether the bots like me. Several generalizations
can be applied and various avenues of code simplification
are open. I'll introduce those as I go.
I am aware of stylistic input from Bill Wendling, about
where put the analysis complexity, but I am positive
that we can move things around easily and will find a
satisfactory solution.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@113839 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
