mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2025-11-01 00:17:01 +00:00
This problem is exposed by r171325 which is already reverted. It is rather hard to fabricate a testing case without it. r171325 should *NOT* be resurrected as it has a potential problem although this problem dosen't directly contribute to PR14988. The bug is tracked by: - rdar://13063553, and - http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=14988 Thank Arnold for coming up a better solution to this problem. After comparing this solution and my original proposal, I decided to ditch mine. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@176225 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Analysis Opportunities:
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:
{1,+,3,+,2}<loop>
Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as
(-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))
In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,
ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:
((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))
This could be folded to
(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//