David Majnemer 9970214474 SROA: The alloca type isn't a candidate promotion type for vectors ...

The alloca's type is irrelevant, only those types which are used in a
load or store of the exact size of the slice should be considered.

This manifested as an assertion failure when we compared the various
types: we had a size mismatch.

This fixes PR21480.

git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@222499 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8

2014-11-21 02:34:55 +00:00

..

address-spaces.ll

…

alignment.ll

…

basictest.ll

…

big-endian.ll

…

fca.ll

…

phi-and-select.ll

SROA: Don't insert instructions before a PHI

2014-09-01 21:20:14 +00:00

slice-order-independence.ll

…

slice-width.ll

Add a test case for SROA where the store size is bigger than slice size. The

2014-08-22 23:27:04 +00:00

vector-conversion.ll

…

vector-lifetime-intrinsic.ll

…

vector-promotion.ll

SROA: The alloca type isn't a candidate promotion type for vectors

2014-11-21 02:34:55 +00:00

vectors-of-pointers.ll

…