CTTZ and CTPOP. The expansion code differs from
that in LegalizeDAG in that it chooses to take the
CTLZ/CTTZ count from the Hi/Lo part depending on
whether the Hi/Lo value is zero, not on whether
CTLZ/CTTZ of Hi/Lo returned 32 (or whatever the
width of the type is) for it. I made this change
because the optimizers may well know that Hi/Lo
is zero and exploit it. The promotion code for
CTTZ also differs from that in LegalizeDAG: it
uses an "or" to get the right result when the
original value is zero, rather than using a compare
and select. This also means the value doesn't
need to be zero extended.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@47075 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
d462ba8539