Files
llvm-6502/lib/Analysis
Dan Gohman ab37f50838 Make SCEVUnknown a CallbackVH, so that it can be notified directly
of Value deletions and RAUWs, instead of relying on ScalarEvolution's
Scalars map being notified, as that's complicated at best, and
insufficient in general.

This means SCEVUnknown needs a non-trivial destructor, so introduce
a mechanism to allow ScalarEvolution to locate all the SCEVUnknowns.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@110086 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
2010-08-02 23:49:30 +00:00
..
2010-07-28 15:31:37 +00:00
2010-07-28 10:46:09 +00:00
2010-07-28 10:57:28 +00:00
2010-07-22 07:46:31 +00:00
2010-08-02 18:50:06 +00:00
2010-08-02 18:50:06 +00:00
2010-06-23 23:38:07 +00:00

Analysis Opportunities:

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:

  {1,+,3,+,2}<loop>

Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as

  (-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))

In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//

In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,

ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:

((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))

This could be folded to

(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))

//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//