mirror of
				https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
				synced 2025-10-30 16:17:05 +00:00 
			
		
		
		
	The docs now build cleanly. Yay! The following warnings were fixed: /home/sean/pg/llvm/llvm/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.rst:364: WARNING: Enumerated list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent. /home/sean/pg/llvm/llvm/docs/InAlloca.rst:: WARNING: document isn't included in any toctree /home/sean/pg/llvm/llvm/docs/CodingStandards.rst:85: WARNING: Title underline too short. Supported C++11 Language and Library Features ------------------------------------------- /home/sean/pg/llvm/llvm/docs/CodingStandards.rst:85: WARNING: Title underline too short. Supported C++11 Language and Library Features ------------------------------------------- /home/sean/pg/llvm/llvm/docs/GettingStarted.rst:185: WARNING: Explicit markup ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent. /home/sean/pg/llvm/llvm/docs/GettingStarted.rst:565: WARNING: Explicit markup ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent. /home/sean/pg/llvm/llvm/docs/GettingStarted.rst:567: WARNING: Block quote ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@202603 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
		
			
				
	
	
		
			442 lines
		
	
	
		
			18 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			442 lines
		
	
	
		
			18 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			ReStructuredText
		
	
	
	
	
	
| =================================
 | |
| How To Release LLVM To The Public
 | |
| =================================
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. contents::
 | |
|    :local:
 | |
|    :depth: 1
 | |
| 
 | |
| Introduction
 | |
| ============
 | |
| 
 | |
| This document contains information about successfully releasing LLVM ---
 | |
| including subprojects: e.g., ``clang`` and ``dragonegg`` --- to the public.  It
 | |
| is the Release Manager's responsibility to ensure that a high quality build of
 | |
| LLVM is released.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you're looking for the document on how to test the release candidates and
 | |
| create the binary packages, please refer to the :doc:`ReleaseProcess` instead.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _timeline:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Release Timeline
 | |
| ================
 | |
| 
 | |
| LLVM is released on a time based schedule --- with major releases roughly
 | |
| every 6 months.  In between major releases there may be dot releases.
 | |
| The release manager will determine if and when to make a dot release based
 | |
| on feedback from the community.  Typically, dot releases should be made if
 | |
| there are large number of bug-fixes in the stable branch or a critical bug
 | |
| has been discovered that affects a large number of users.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Unless otherwise stated, dot releases will follow the same procedure as
 | |
| major releases.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The release process is roughly as follows:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Set code freeze and branch creation date for 6 months after last code freeze
 | |
|   date.  Announce release schedule to the LLVM community and update the website.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Create release branch and begin release process.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Send out release candidate sources for first round of testing.  Testing lasts
 | |
|   7-10 days.  During the first round of testing, any regressions found should be
 | |
|   fixed.  Patches are merged from mainline into the release branch.  Also, all
 | |
|   features need to be completed during this time.  Any features not completed at
 | |
|   the end of the first round of testing will be removed or disabled for the
 | |
|   release.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Generate and send out the second release candidate sources.  Only *critial*
 | |
|   bugs found during this testing phase will be fixed.  Any bugs introduced by
 | |
|   merged patches will be fixed.  If so a third round of testing is needed.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * The release notes are updated.
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Finally, release!
 | |
| 
 | |
| The release process will be accelerated for dot releases.  If the first round
 | |
| of testing finds no critical bugs and no regressions since the last major release,
 | |
| then additional rounds of testing will not be required.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Release Process
 | |
| ===============
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. contents::
 | |
|    :local:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Release Administrative Tasks
 | |
| ----------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| This section describes a few administrative tasks that need to be done for the
 | |
| release process to begin.  Specifically, it involves:
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Creating the release branch,
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Setting version numbers, and
 | |
| 
 | |
| * Tagging release candidates for the release team to begin testing.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Create Release Branch
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| Branch the Subversion trunk using the following procedure:
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Remind developers that the release branching is imminent and to refrain from
 | |
|    committing patches that might break the build.  E.g., new features, large
 | |
|    patches for works in progress, an overhaul of the type system, an exciting
 | |
|    new TableGen feature, etc.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Verify that the current Subversion trunk is in decent shape by
 | |
|    examining nightly tester and buildbot results.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Create the release branch for ``llvm``, ``clang``, the ``test-suite``, and
 | |
|    ``dragonegg`` from the last known good revision.  The branch's name is
 | |
|    ``release_XY``, where ``X`` is the major and ``Y`` the minor release
 | |
|    numbers.  The branches should be created using the following commands:
 | |
| 
 | |
|    ::
 | |
| 
 | |
|      $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk \
 | |
|                 https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_XY
 | |
| 
 | |
|      $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/trunk \
 | |
|                 https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_XY
 | |
| 
 | |
|      $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/trunk \
 | |
|                 https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/branches/release_XY
 | |
| 
 | |
|      $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/trunk \
 | |
|                 https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/branches/release_XY
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Advise developers that they may now check their patches into the Subversion
 | |
|    tree again.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. The Release Manager should switch to the release branch, because all changes
 | |
|    to the release will now be done in the branch.  The easiest way to do this is
 | |
|    to grab a working copy using the following commands:
 | |
| 
 | |
|    ::
 | |
| 
 | |
|      $ svn co https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_XY llvm-X.Y
 | |
| 
 | |
|      $ svn co https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_XY clang-X.Y
 | |
| 
 | |
|      $ svn co https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/branches/release_XY dragonegg-X.Y
 | |
| 
 | |
|      $ svn co https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/branches/release_XY test-suite-X.Y
 | |
| 
 | |
| Update LLVM Version
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| After creating the LLVM release branch, update the release branches'
 | |
| ``autoconf`` and ``configure.ac`` versions from '``X.Ysvn``' to '``X.Y``'.
 | |
| Update it on mainline as well to be the next version ('``X.Y+1svn``').
 | |
| Regenerate the configure scripts for both ``llvm`` and the ``test-suite``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In addition, the version numbers of all the Bugzilla components must be updated
 | |
| for the next release.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Build the LLVM Release Candidates
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| Create release candidates for ``llvm``, ``clang``, ``dragonegg``, and the LLVM
 | |
| ``test-suite`` by tagging the branch with the respective release candidate
 | |
| number.  For instance, to create **Release Candidate 1** you would issue the
 | |
| following commands:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ::
 | |
| 
 | |
|   $ svn mkdir https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/tags/RELEASE_XY
 | |
|   $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_XY \
 | |
|              https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/tags/RELEASE_XY/rc1
 | |
| 
 | |
|   $ svn mkdir https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/tags/RELEASE_XY
 | |
|   $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_XY \
 | |
|              https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/tags/RELEASE_XY/rc1
 | |
| 
 | |
|   $ svn mkdir https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/tags/RELEASE_XY
 | |
|   $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/branches/release_XY \
 | |
|              https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/tags/RELEASE_XY/rc1
 | |
| 
 | |
|   $ svn mkdir https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/tags/RELEASE_XY
 | |
|   $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/branches/release_XY \
 | |
|              https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/tags/RELEASE_XY/rc1
 | |
| 
 | |
| Similarly, **Release Candidate 2** would be named ``RC2`` and so on.  This keeps
 | |
| a permanent copy of the release candidate around for people to export and build
 | |
| as they wish.  The final released sources will be tagged in the ``RELEASE_XY``
 | |
| directory as ``Final`` (c.f. :ref:`tag`).
 | |
| 
 | |
| The Release Manager may supply pre-packaged source tarballs for users.  This can
 | |
| be done with the following commands:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ::
 | |
| 
 | |
|   $ svn export https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/tags/RELEASE_XY/rc1 llvm-X.Yrc1
 | |
|   $ svn export https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/tags/RELEASE_XY/rc1 clang-X.Yrc1
 | |
|   $ svn export https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/tags/RELEASE_XY/rc1 dragonegg-X.Yrc1
 | |
|   $ svn export https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/tags/RELEASE_XY/rc1 llvm-test-X.Yrc1
 | |
| 
 | |
|   $ tar -cvf - llvm-X.Yrc1        | gzip > llvm-X.Yrc1.src.tar.gz
 | |
|   $ tar -cvf - clang-X.Yrc1       | gzip > clang-X.Yrc1.src.tar.gz
 | |
|   $ tar -cvf - dragonegg-X.Yrc1   | gzip > dragonegg-X.Yrc1.src.tar.gz
 | |
|   $ tar -cvf - llvm-test-X.Yrc1   | gzip > llvm-test-X.Yrc1.src.tar.gz
 | |
| 
 | |
| Building the Release
 | |
| --------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The builds of ``llvm``, ``clang``, and ``dragonegg`` *must* be free of
 | |
| errors and warnings in Debug, Release+Asserts, and Release builds.  If all
 | |
| builds are clean, then the release passes Build Qualification.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The ``make`` options for building the different modes:
 | |
| 
 | |
| +-----------------+---------------------------------------------+
 | |
| | Mode            | Options                                     |
 | |
| +=================+=============================================+
 | |
| | Debug           | ``ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=0``                      |
 | |
| +-----------------+---------------------------------------------+
 | |
| | Release+Asserts | ``ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1``                      |
 | |
| +-----------------+---------------------------------------------+
 | |
| | Release         | ``ENABLE_OPTIMIZED=1 DISABLE_ASSERTIONS=1`` |
 | |
| +-----------------+---------------------------------------------+
 | |
| 
 | |
| Build LLVM
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| Build ``Debug``, ``Release+Asserts``, and ``Release`` versions
 | |
| of ``llvm`` on all supported platforms.  Directions to build ``llvm``
 | |
| are :doc:`here <GettingStarted>`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Build Clang Binary Distribution
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| Creating the ``clang`` binary distribution (Debug/Release+Asserts/Release)
 | |
| requires performing the following steps for each supported platform:
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Build clang according to the directions `here
 | |
|    <http://clang.llvm.org/get_started.html>`__.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Build both a Debug and Release version of clang.  The binary will be the
 | |
|    Release build.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Package ``clang`` (details to follow).
 | |
| 
 | |
| Target Specific Build Details
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| The table below specifies which compilers are used for each Arch/OS combination
 | |
| when qualifying the build of ``llvm``, ``clang``, and ``dragonegg``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| +--------------+---------------+----------------------+
 | |
| | Architecture | OS            | compiler             |
 | |
| +==============+===============+======================+
 | |
| | x86-32       | Mac OS 10.5   | gcc 4.0.1            |
 | |
| +--------------+---------------+----------------------+
 | |
| | x86-32       | Linux         | gcc 4.2.X, gcc 4.3.X |
 | |
| +--------------+---------------+----------------------+
 | |
| | x86-32       | FreeBSD       | gcc 4.2.X            |
 | |
| +--------------+---------------+----------------------+
 | |
| | x86-32       | mingw         | gcc 3.4.5            |
 | |
| +--------------+---------------+----------------------+
 | |
| | x86-64       | Mac OS 10.5   | gcc 4.0.1            |
 | |
| +--------------+---------------+----------------------+
 | |
| | x86-64       | Linux         | gcc 4.2.X, gcc 4.3.X |
 | |
| +--------------+---------------+----------------------+
 | |
| | x86-64       | FreeBSD       | gcc 4.2.X            |
 | |
| +--------------+---------------+----------------------+
 | |
| | ARMv7        | Linux         | gcc 4.6.X, gcc 4.7.X |
 | |
| +--------------+---------------+----------------------+
 | |
| 
 | |
| Release Qualification Criteria
 | |
| ------------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| A release is qualified when it has no regressions from the previous release (or
 | |
| baseline).  Regressions are related to correctness first and performance second.
 | |
| (We may tolerate some minor performance regressions if they are deemed
 | |
| necessary for the general quality of the compiler.)
 | |
| 
 | |
| **Regressions are new failures in the set of tests that are used to qualify
 | |
| each product and only include things on the list.  Every release will have
 | |
| some bugs in it.  It is the reality of developing a complex piece of
 | |
| software.  We need a very concrete and definitive release criteria that
 | |
| ensures we have monotonically improving quality on some metric.  The metric we
 | |
| use is described below.  This doesn't mean that we don't care about other
 | |
| criteria, but these are the criteria which we found to be most important and
 | |
| which must be satisfied before a release can go out.**
 | |
| 
 | |
| Qualify LLVM
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| LLVM is qualified when it has a clean test run without a front-end.  And it has
 | |
| no regressions when using either ``clang`` or ``dragonegg`` with the
 | |
| ``test-suite`` from the previous release.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Qualify Clang
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| ``Clang`` is qualified when front-end specific tests in the ``llvm`` regression
 | |
| test suite all pass, clang's own test suite passes cleanly, and there are no
 | |
| regressions in the ``test-suite``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Specific Target Qualification Details
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| +--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
 | |
| | Architecture | OS          | clang baseline | tests                       |
 | |
| +==============+=============+================+=============================+
 | |
| | x86-32       | Linux       | last release   | llvm regression tests,      |
 | |
| |              |             |                | clang regression tests,     |
 | |
| |              |             |                | test-suite (including spec) |
 | |
| +--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
 | |
| | x86-32       | FreeBSD     | last release   | llvm regression tests,      |
 | |
| |              |             |                | clang regression tests,     |
 | |
| |              |             |                | test-suite                  |
 | |
| +--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
 | |
| | x86-32       | mingw       | none           | QT                          |
 | |
| +--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
 | |
| | x86-64       | Mac OS 10.X | last release   | llvm regression tests,      |
 | |
| |              |             |                | clang regression tests,     |
 | |
| |              |             |                | test-suite (including spec) |
 | |
| +--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
 | |
| | x86-64       | Linux       | last release   | llvm regression tests,      |
 | |
| |              |             |                | clang regression tests,     |
 | |
| |              |             |                | test-suite (including spec) |
 | |
| +--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
 | |
| | x86-64       | FreeBSD     | last release   | llvm regression tests,      |
 | |
| |              |             |                | clang regression tests,     |
 | |
| |              |             |                | test-suite                  |
 | |
| +--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
 | |
| | ARMv7A       | Linux       | last release   | llvm regression tests,      |
 | |
| |              |             |                | clang regression tests,     |
 | |
| |              |             |                | test-suite                  |
 | |
| +--------------+-------------+----------------+-----------------------------+
 | |
| 
 | |
| Community Testing
 | |
| -----------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Once all testing has been completed and appropriate bugs filed, the release
 | |
| candidate tarballs are put on the website and the LLVM community is notified.
 | |
| Ask that all LLVM developers test the release in 2 ways:
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Download ``llvm-X.Y``, ``llvm-test-X.Y``, and the appropriate ``clang``
 | |
|    binary.  Build LLVM.  Run ``make check`` and the full LLVM test suite (``make
 | |
|    TEST=nightly report``).
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Download ``llvm-X.Y``, ``llvm-test-X.Y``, and the ``clang`` sources.  Compile
 | |
|    everything.  Run ``make check`` and the full LLVM test suite (``make
 | |
|    TEST=nightly report``).
 | |
| 
 | |
| Ask LLVM developers to submit the test suite report and ``make check`` results
 | |
| to the list.  Verify that there are no regressions from the previous release.
 | |
| The results are not used to qualify a release, but to spot other potential
 | |
| problems.  For unsupported targets, verify that ``make check`` is at least
 | |
| clean.
 | |
| 
 | |
| During the first round of testing, all regressions must be fixed before the
 | |
| second release candidate is tagged.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If this is the second round of testing, the testing is only to ensure that bug
 | |
| fixes previously merged in have not created new major problems. *This is not
 | |
| the time to solve additional and unrelated bugs!* If no patches are merged in,
 | |
| the release is determined to be ready and the release manager may move onto the
 | |
| next stage.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Release Patch Rules
 | |
| -------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| Below are the rules regarding patching the release branch:
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Patches applied to the release branch may only be applied by the release
 | |
|    manager.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. During the first round of testing, patches that fix regressions or that are
 | |
|    small and relatively risk free (verified by the appropriate code owner) are
 | |
|    applied to the branch.  Code owners are asked to be very conservative in
 | |
|    approving patches for the branch.  We reserve the right to reject any patch
 | |
|    that does not fix a regression as previously defined.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. During the remaining rounds of testing, only patches that fix critical
 | |
|    regressions may be applied.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. For dot releases all patches must mantain both API and ABI compatibility with
 | |
|    the previous major release.  Only bugfixes will be accepted.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Release Final Tasks
 | |
| -------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The final stages of the release process involves tagging the "final" release
 | |
| branch, updating documentation that refers to the release, and updating the
 | |
| demo page.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Update Documentation
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| Review the documentation and ensure that it is up to date.  The "Release Notes"
 | |
| must be updated to reflect new features, bug fixes, new known issues, and
 | |
| changes in the list of supported platforms.  The "Getting Started Guide" should
 | |
| be updated to reflect the new release version number tag available from
 | |
| Subversion and changes in basic system requirements.  Merge both changes from
 | |
| mainline into the release branch.
 | |
| 
 | |
| .. _tag:
 | |
| 
 | |
| Tag the LLVM Final Release
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| Tag the final release sources using the following procedure:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ::
 | |
| 
 | |
|   $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_XY \
 | |
|              https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/tags/RELEASE_XY/Final
 | |
| 
 | |
|   $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/branches/release_XY \
 | |
|              https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/cfe/tags/RELEASE_XY/Final
 | |
| 
 | |
|   $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/branches/release_XY \
 | |
|              https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/dragonegg/tags/RELEASE_XY/Final
 | |
| 
 | |
|   $ svn copy https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/branches/release_XY \
 | |
|              https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/test-suite/tags/RELEASE_XY/Final
 | |
| 
 | |
| Update the LLVM Demo Page
 | |
| -------------------------
 | |
| 
 | |
| The LLVM demo page must be updated to use the new release.  This consists of
 | |
| using the new ``clang`` binary and building LLVM.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Update the LLVM Website
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| The website must be updated before the release announcement is sent out.  Here
 | |
| is what to do:
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Check out the ``www`` module from Subversion.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Create a new subdirectory ``X.Y`` in the releases directory.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Commit the ``llvm``, ``test-suite``, ``clang`` source, ``clang binaries``,
 | |
|    ``dragonegg`` source, and ``dragonegg`` binaries in this new directory.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Copy and commit the ``llvm/docs`` and ``LICENSE.txt`` files into this new
 | |
|    directory.  The docs should be built with ``BUILD_FOR_WEBSITE=1``.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Commit the ``index.html`` to the ``release/X.Y`` directory to redirect (use
 | |
|    from previous release).
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Update the ``releases/download.html`` file with the new release.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Update the ``releases/index.html`` with the new release and link to release
 | |
|    documentation.
 | |
| 
 | |
| #. Finally, update the main page (``index.html`` and sidebar) to point to the
 | |
|    new release and release announcement.  Make sure this all gets committed back
 | |
|    into Subversion.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Announce the Release
 | |
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 | |
| 
 | |
| Have Chris send out the release announcement when everything is finished.
 | |
| 
 |