Chris Lattner e9d782b7be Implement an optimization for == and != comparisons like this: ... _Bool test2(int X, int Y) { return &arr[X][Y] == arr; } instead of generating this: bool %test2(int %X, int %Y) { %tmp.3.idx = mul int %X, 160 ; <int> [#uses=1] %tmp.3.idx1 = shl int %Y, ubyte 2 ; <int> [#uses=1] %tmp.3.offs2 = sub int 0, %tmp.3.idx ; <int> [#uses=1] %tmp.7 = seteq int %tmp.3.idx1, %tmp.3.offs2 ; <bool> [#uses=1] ret bool %tmp.7 } generate this: bool %test2(int %X, int %Y) { seteq int %X, 0 ; <bool>:0 [#uses=1] seteq int %Y, 0 ; <bool>:1 [#uses=1] %tmp.7 = and bool %0, %1 ; <bool> [#uses=1] ret bool %tmp.7 } This idiom occurs in C++ programs when iterating from begin() to end(), in a vector or array. For example, we now compile this: void test(int X, int Y) { for (int *i = arr; i != arr+100; ++i) foo(*i); } to this: no_exit: ; preds = %entry, %no_exit ... %exitcond = seteq uint %indvar.next, 100 ; <bool> [#uses=1] br bool %exitcond, label %return, label %no_exit instead of this: no_exit: ; preds = %entry, %no_exit ... %inc5 = getelementptr [100 x [40 x int]]* %arr, int 0, int 0, int %inc.rec ; <int*> [#uses=1] %tmp.8 = seteq int* %inc5, getelementptr ([100 x [40 x int]]* %arr, int 0, int 100, int 0) ; <bool> [#uses=1] %indvar.next = add uint %indvar, 1 ; <uint> [#uses=1] br bool %tmp.8, label %return, label %no_exit git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@19536 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8		2005-01-13 22:25:21 +00:00
..
Hello	Add the LOADABLE_MODULE=1 directive to indicate that this shared library is	2005-01-11 04:33:32 +00:00
Instrumentation
IPO	Apply feedback from Chris.	2005-01-10 04:23:32 +00:00
Scalar	Implement an optimization for == and != comparisons like this:	2005-01-13 22:25:21 +00:00
Utils	Implement SimplifyCFG/DeadSetCC.ll	2005-01-01 16:02:12 +00:00
ExprTypeConvert.cpp
LevelRaise.cpp
Makefile
TransformInternals.cpp
TransformInternals.h