mirror of
https://github.com/c64scene-ar/llvm-6502.git
synced 2025-09-13 23:25:06 +00:00
f28cb39e4c
Since we have to iterate this map not that infrequently, we should use a map that is efficient for iteration. It is also almost certainly much faster for lookups as well. There is more to do in terms of reducing the wasted overhead of GMR's runtime though. Not sure how much is worthwhile though. The loop improvements should hopefully address the code review that Duncan gave when he saw this code as I moved it around. git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@242891 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
Analysis Opportunities:
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
In test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/quadradic-exit-value.ll, the
ScalarEvolution expression for %r is this:
{1,+,3,+,2}<loop>
Outside the loop, this could be evaluated simply as (%n * %n), however
ScalarEvolution currently evaluates it as
(-2 + (2 * (trunc i65 (((zext i64 (-2 + %n) to i65) * (zext i64 (-1 + %n) to i65)) /u 2) to i64)) + (3 * %n))
In addition to being much more complicated, it involves i65 arithmetic,
which is very inefficient when expanded into code.
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
In formatValue in test/CodeGen/X86/lsr-delayed-fold.ll,
ScalarEvolution is forming this expression:
((trunc i64 (-1 * %arg5) to i32) + (trunc i64 %arg5 to i32) + (-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32)))
This could be folded to
(-1 * (trunc i64 undef to i32))
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//