mirror of
https://github.com/irmen/prog8.git
synced 2024-12-23 09:32:43 +00:00
todo
This commit is contained in:
parent
54fccec7d7
commit
648d9fc269
@ -1,14 +1,6 @@
|
|||||||
TODO
|
TODO
|
||||||
====
|
====
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
support this usage of defer somehow?:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if diskio.f_open(filename) {
|
|
||||||
defer diskio.f_close()
|
|
||||||
...
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
need help with: PET disk routines (OPEN, SETLFS etc are not exposed as kernal calls)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
...
|
...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -32,7 +24,7 @@ Future Things and Ideas
|
|||||||
- Improve the SublimeText syntax file for prog8, you can also install this for 'bat': https://github.com/sharkdp/bat?tab=readme-ov-file#adding-new-syntaxes--language-definitions
|
- Improve the SublimeText syntax file for prog8, you can also install this for 'bat': https://github.com/sharkdp/bat?tab=readme-ov-file#adding-new-syntaxes--language-definitions
|
||||||
- Does it make codegen easier if everything is an expression? Start with the PtProgram ast , get rid of the statements there -> expressions that have Void data type
|
- Does it make codegen easier if everything is an expression? Start with the PtProgram ast , get rid of the statements there -> expressions that have Void data type
|
||||||
- Can we support signed % (remainder) somehow?
|
- Can we support signed % (remainder) somehow?
|
||||||
- IR: implement missing operators in AssignmentGen (array shifts etc)
|
|
||||||
- instead of copy-pasting inline asmsubs, make them into a 64tass macro and use that instead.
|
- instead of copy-pasting inline asmsubs, make them into a 64tass macro and use that instead.
|
||||||
that will allow them to be reused from custom user written assembly code as well.
|
that will allow them to be reused from custom user written assembly code as well.
|
||||||
- Multidimensional arrays and chained indexing, purely as syntactic sugar over regular arrays. Probaby only useful if we have typed pointers.
|
- Multidimensional arrays and chained indexing, purely as syntactic sugar over regular arrays. Probaby only useful if we have typed pointers.
|
||||||
@ -49,20 +41,6 @@ Future Things and Ideas
|
|||||||
- OR.... make all this more generic and use some %segment option to create real segments for 64tass?
|
- OR.... make all this more generic and use some %segment option to create real segments for 64tass?
|
||||||
- (need separate step in codegen and IR to write the "golden" variables)
|
- (need separate step in codegen and IR to write the "golden" variables)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- ir: support %align on code chunks
|
|
||||||
- ir: fix call() return value handling
|
|
||||||
- ir: fix float register parameters (FAC1,FAC2) for extsubs, search for TODO("floating point register parameters not supported")
|
|
||||||
- ir: proper code gen for the CALLI instruction and that it (optionally) returns a word value that needs to be assigned to a reg
|
|
||||||
- ir: idea: (but LLVM IR simply keeps the variables, so not a good idea then?...): replace all scalar variables by an allocated register. Keep a table of the variable to register mapping (including the datatype)
|
|
||||||
global initialization values are simply a list of LOAD instructions.
|
|
||||||
Variables replaced include all subroutine parameters! So the only variables that remain as variables are arrays and strings.
|
|
||||||
- ir: add more optimizations in IRPeepholeOptimizer
|
|
||||||
- ir: the @split arrays are currently also split in _lsb/_msb arrays in the IR, and operations take multiple (byte) instructions that may lead to verbose and slow operation and machine code generation down the line.
|
|
||||||
maybe another representation is needed once actual codegeneration is done from the IR...?
|
|
||||||
- ir: split word arrays, both _msb and _lsb arrays are tagged with an alignment. This is not what's intended; only the one put in memory first should be aligned (the other one should follow straight after it)
|
|
||||||
- ir: getting it in shape for code generation...
|
|
||||||
- ir: make optimizeBitTest work for IR too to use the BIT instruction?
|
|
||||||
- ir: make sure that a 6502 codegen based off the IR, still generates BIT instructions when testing bit 7 or 6 of a byte var.
|
|
||||||
- [problematic due to using 64tass:] better support for building library programs, where unused .proc are NOT deleted from the assembly.
|
- [problematic due to using 64tass:] better support for building library programs, where unused .proc are NOT deleted from the assembly.
|
||||||
Perhaps replace all uses of .proc/.pend/.endproc by .block/.bend will fix that with a compiler flag?
|
Perhaps replace all uses of .proc/.pend/.endproc by .block/.bend will fix that with a compiler flag?
|
||||||
But all library code written in asm uses .proc already..... (textual search/replace when writing the actual asm?)
|
But all library code written in asm uses .proc already..... (textual search/replace when writing the actual asm?)
|
||||||
@ -70,16 +48,36 @@ Future Things and Ideas
|
|||||||
- Zig-like try-based error handling where the V flag could indicate error condition? and/or BRK to jump into monitor on failure? (has to set BRK vector for that) But the V flag is also set on certain normal instructions
|
- Zig-like try-based error handling where the V flag could indicate error condition? and/or BRK to jump into monitor on failure? (has to set BRK vector for that) But the V flag is also set on certain normal instructions
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Libraries:
|
IR/VM
|
||||||
|
-----
|
||||||
|
- implement missing operators in AssignmentGen (array shifts etc)
|
||||||
|
- support %align on code chunks
|
||||||
|
- fix call() return value handling
|
||||||
|
- fix float register parameters (FAC1,FAC2) for extsubs, search for TODO("floating point register parameters not supported")
|
||||||
|
- proper code gen for the CALLI instruction and that it (optionally) returns a word value that needs to be assigned to a reg
|
||||||
|
- idea: (but LLVM IR simply keeps the variables, so not a good idea then?...): replace all scalar variables by an allocated register. Keep a table of the variable to register mapping (including the datatype)
|
||||||
|
global initialization values are simply a list of LOAD instructions.
|
||||||
|
Variables replaced include all subroutine parameters! So the only variables that remain as variables are arrays and strings.
|
||||||
|
- add more optimizations in IRPeepholeOptimizer
|
||||||
|
- the @split arrays are currently also split in _lsb/_msb arrays in the IR, and operations take multiple (byte) instructions that may lead to verbose and slow operation and machine code generation down the line.
|
||||||
|
maybe another representation is needed once actual codegeneration is done from the IR...?
|
||||||
|
- split word arrays, both _msb and _lsb arrays are tagged with an alignment. This is not what's intended; only the one put in memory first should be aligned (the other one should follow straight after it)
|
||||||
|
- getting it in shape for code generation...
|
||||||
|
- make optimizeBitTest work for IR too to use the BIT instruction?
|
||||||
|
- make sure that a 6502 codegen based off the IR, still generates BIT instructions when testing bit 7 or 6 of a byte var.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Libraries
|
||||||
|
---------
|
||||||
|
- pet32 target: make syslib more complete (missing kernal routines)?
|
||||||
|
- need help with: PET disk routines (OPEN, SETLFS etc are not exposed as kernal calls)
|
||||||
- fix the problems in atari target, and flesh out its libraries.
|
- fix the problems in atari target, and flesh out its libraries.
|
||||||
- c128 target: make syslib more complete (missing kernal routines)?
|
- c128 target: make syslib more complete (missing kernal routines)?
|
||||||
- pet32 target: make syslib more complete (missing kernal routines)?
|
|
||||||
- VM: implement the last diskio support (file listings)
|
- VM: implement the last diskio support (file listings)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Optimizations:
|
Optimizations
|
||||||
|
-------------
|
||||||
- Optimize the IfExpression code generation to be more like regular if-else code. (both 6502 and IR) search for "TODO don't store condition as expression"
|
- Optimize the IfExpression code generation to be more like regular if-else code. (both 6502 and IR) search for "TODO don't store condition as expression"
|
||||||
- VariableAllocator: can we think of a smarter strategy for allocating variables into zeropage, rather than first-come-first-served?
|
- VariableAllocator: can we think of a smarter strategy for allocating variables into zeropage, rather than first-come-first-served?
|
||||||
for instance, vars used inside loops first, then loopvars, then uwords used as pointers (or these first??), then the rest
|
for instance, vars used inside loops first, then loopvars, then uwords used as pointers (or these first??), then the rest
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user