mirror of
https://github.com/irmen/prog8.git
synced 2024-11-20 03:32:05 +00:00
"not" no longer in LogicalOperators because it makes assembler generate invalid code somehow
This commit is contained in:
parent
f675dbc726
commit
7901ec2a64
@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ package prog8.code.core
|
||||
val AssociativeOperators = setOf("+", "*", "&", "|", "^", "or", "and", "xor", "==", "!=")
|
||||
val ComparisonOperators = setOf("==", "!=", "<", ">", "<=", ">=")
|
||||
val AugmentAssignmentOperators = setOf("+", "-", "/", "*", "&", "|", "^", "<<", ">>", "%", "and", "or", "xor")
|
||||
val LogicalOperators = setOf("and", "or", "xor", "not")
|
||||
val LogicalOperators = setOf("and", "or", "xor") // not has been replaced by == 0
|
||||
val BitwiseOperators = setOf("&", "|", "^")
|
||||
|
||||
fun invertedComparisonOperator(operator: String) =
|
||||
|
@ -3,9 +3,10 @@ TODO
|
||||
|
||||
For next release
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
- petaxian roller.p8 line 49 (also see test.p8) generates large code compared to 8.2
|
||||
- cx16 programs seem to poke 0, 56 at exit?
|
||||
- assembling hello4.asm prints stray characters in the string
|
||||
|
||||
- assembler incorrectly assembles hello.asm now (crash when run)
|
||||
- petaxian roller.p8 line 49 (also see test.p8) generates large code compared to 8.2
|
||||
|
||||
- code gen for if statements has become inefficient? vm/6502?
|
||||
if not diskio.iteration_in_progress or not num_bytes
|
||||
@ -24,7 +25,8 @@ For next release
|
||||
can do this for instance by replacing and/or/xor with their bitwise versions &, |, ^
|
||||
- ...or: 6502: fix logical and/or/xor routines to just be bitwise routines.
|
||||
|
||||
- check all examples if they still work, maybe we find bug for...:
|
||||
- LogicalOperators can't contain "not" because that will make the assemlber create invalid
|
||||
code for hello.asm (crash when ran). Why? Should be fixed?
|
||||
|
||||
- compiling logical.p8 to virtual with optimization generates a lot larger code as without optimizations.
|
||||
this is not the case for the 6502 codegen.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user