mirror of
https://github.com/irmen/prog8.git
synced 2024-11-18 19:12:44 +00:00
r=(q+r)-c and r=q+(r-c) are now both also 'augmentable', and BinExprSplitter doesn't check for associativeOperator anymore
This commit is contained in:
parent
87600b23db
commit
f9399bcce7
@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ internal class AugmentableAssignmentAsmGen(private val program: Program,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
throw FatalAstException("assignment should be augmentable $binExpr")
|
||||
throw FatalAstException("assignment should follow augmentable rules $binExpr")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private fun inplaceModification(target: AsmAssignTarget, operator: String, origValue: Expression) {
|
||||
|
@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ X = BinExpr X = LeftExpr
|
||||
if(assignment.target isSameAs binExpr.left || assignment.target isSameAs binExpr.right)
|
||||
return noModifications
|
||||
|
||||
if(binExpr.right.isSimple && !assignment.isAugmentable) {
|
||||
if(binExpr.right.isSimple) {
|
||||
val firstAssign = Assignment(assignment.target.copy(), binExpr.left, binExpr.left.position)
|
||||
val targetExpr = assignment.target.toExpression()
|
||||
val augExpr = BinaryExpression(targetExpr, binExpr.operator, binExpr.right, binExpr.right.position)
|
||||
|
@ -97,19 +97,20 @@ internal class VariousCleanups(val program: Program, val errors: IErrorReporter)
|
||||
|
||||
val nextAssign = assignment.nextSibling() as? Assignment
|
||||
if(nextAssign!=null && nextAssign.target.isSameAs(assignment.target, program)) {
|
||||
// TODO hmm, if both assignments assign to the same thing, can't we just remove the first altogether???
|
||||
// TODO hmm, if both assignments assign to the same thing, can't we just remove the first altogether??? as long as there isn't a function call in the value!
|
||||
|
||||
if(nextAssign.value isSameAs assignment.value)
|
||||
return listOf(IAstModification.Remove(assignment, parent as IStatementContainer))
|
||||
|
||||
if((assignment.value as? NumericLiteralValue)?.number==0.0 && nextAssign.isAugmentable) {
|
||||
val value = nextAssign.value as BinaryExpression
|
||||
require(value.left isSameAs assignment.target)
|
||||
val assign = Assignment(assignment.target, value.right, nextAssign.position)
|
||||
return listOf(
|
||||
IAstModification.Remove(assignment, parent as IStatementContainer),
|
||||
IAstModification.ReplaceNode(nextAssign, assign, parent)
|
||||
)
|
||||
if(value.left isSameAs assignment.target) {
|
||||
val assign = Assignment(assignment.target, value.right, nextAssign.position)
|
||||
return listOf(
|
||||
IAstModification.Remove(assignment, parent as IStatementContainer),
|
||||
IAstModification.ReplaceNode(nextAssign, assign, parent)
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -455,4 +455,21 @@ class TestOptimization: FunSpec({
|
||||
errors.errors[0] shouldContain "type of value BYTE doesn't match target UBYTE"
|
||||
errors.errors[1] shouldContain "value '-1' out of range for unsigned byte"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
test("test augmented expression asmgen") {
|
||||
val src = """
|
||||
main {
|
||||
sub start() {
|
||||
ubyte c
|
||||
ubyte r
|
||||
ubyte q
|
||||
r = (q+r)-c
|
||||
q=r
|
||||
r = q+(r-c)
|
||||
q=r
|
||||
}
|
||||
}"""
|
||||
val result = compileText(C64Target, optimize=false, src, writeAssembly=true).assertSuccess()
|
||||
result.program.entrypoint.statements.size shouldBe 10
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
@ -351,6 +351,21 @@ open class Assignment(var target: AssignTarget, var value: Expression, final ove
|
||||
if(binExpr.left isSameAs target)
|
||||
return true // A = A <operator> Something
|
||||
|
||||
if(binExpr.operator in "+-") {
|
||||
val leftBinExpr = binExpr.left as? BinaryExpression
|
||||
if(leftBinExpr!=null && leftBinExpr.operator in "+-") {
|
||||
// A = (A +- x) +- y
|
||||
if(leftBinExpr.left isSameAs target || leftBinExpr.right isSameAs target || binExpr.right isSameAs target)
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
val rightBinExpr = binExpr.right as? BinaryExpression
|
||||
if(rightBinExpr!=null && rightBinExpr.operator in "+-") {
|
||||
// A = y +- (A +- x)
|
||||
if(rightBinExpr.left isSameAs target || rightBinExpr.right isSameAs target || binExpr.left isSameAs target)
|
||||
return true
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if(binExpr.operator in associativeOperators) {
|
||||
if (binExpr.left !is BinaryExpression && binExpr.right isSameAs target)
|
||||
return true // A = v <associative-operator> A
|
||||
|
@ -742,14 +742,11 @@ class TestProg8Parser: FunSpec( {
|
||||
r = not q ; #9 no
|
||||
r = (q+r)+5 ; #10 yes
|
||||
r = q+(r+5) ; #11 yes
|
||||
r = (q+r)-5 ; #12 yes TODO FIX THIS ONE
|
||||
r = q+(r-5) ; #13 yes TODO FIX THIS ONE
|
||||
r = (q+r)-5 ; #12 yes
|
||||
r = q+(r-5) ; #13 yes
|
||||
}
|
||||
}""")
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO fix augmented result for the above mentioned assignments
|
||||
// TODO certain typecast expressions are also augmentable?? what does this even mean, and does the generated code make a difference???
|
||||
|
||||
val module = parseModule(src)
|
||||
val program = Program("test", DummyFunctions, DummyMemsizer, DummyStringEncoder)
|
||||
program.addModule(module)
|
||||
@ -766,7 +763,7 @@ class TestProg8Parser: FunSpec( {
|
||||
for((idx, pp) in stmts.drop(2).zip(expectedResults).withIndex()) {
|
||||
val assign = pp.first as Assignment
|
||||
val expected = pp.second
|
||||
withClue("#${idx+1}: should be augmentable but isn't : $assign") {
|
||||
withClue("#${idx+1}: should${if(expected) "" else "n't"} be augmentable: $assign") {
|
||||
assign.isAugmentable shouldBe expected
|
||||
assign.value shouldBe (instanceOf<PrefixExpression>() or instanceOf<BinaryExpression>() or instanceOf<TypecastExpression>())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -3,7 +3,9 @@ TODO
|
||||
|
||||
For next compiler release (7.4)
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
BUG: fix "assignment isAugmented correctness" test
|
||||
fix "test augmented expression asmgen" unittest (and textelite compilation)
|
||||
|
||||
TODO certain typecast expressions are also augmentable?? what does this even mean, and does the generated code make a difference???
|
||||
|
||||
optimize TODO in "Add assignment to initialize with zero" in StatementReorderer
|
||||
optimize TODO in after(assignment) in VariousCleanups
|
||||
@ -12,6 +14,7 @@ optimize: there is an optimizations in AsmOptimizer that can only be done correc
|
||||
if it knows about regular ram vs io space ram distinction.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Blocked by an official Commander-x16 v39 release
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
- simplify cx16.joystick_get2() once this cx16 rom issue is resolved: https://github.com/commanderx16/x16-rom/issues/203
|
||||
@ -21,6 +24,7 @@ Blocked by an official Commander-x16 v39 release
|
||||
Future
|
||||
^^^^^^
|
||||
- use UByte instead of Short
|
||||
- rethink the whole "isAugmentable" business. Because the way this is determined, should always also be exactly mirrorred in the AugmentableAssignmentAsmGen or you'll get a crash at code gen time.
|
||||
- simplifyConditionalExpression() should not split expression if it still results in stack-based evaluation
|
||||
- remove special code generation for while and util expression
|
||||
by rewriting while and until expressions into if+jump (just consider them syntactic sugar)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user