====
TODO
====

- get rid of all other TODO's in the code ;-)
- line-circle-gfx examples are now a few hundred bytes larger than before. Why is that, can it be fixed?
- make it possible for array literals to not only contain compile time constants
- further optimize assignment codegeneration
- implement @stack for asmsub parameters
- make it possible to use cpu opcodes such as 'nop' as variable names by prefixing all asm vars with something such as '_'
- option to load the built-in library files from a directory instead of the embedded ones (for easier library development/debugging)
- see if we can group some errors together for instance the (now single) errors about unidentified symbols


More optimizations
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Add more compiler optimizations to the existing ones.

- more targeted optimizations for assigment asm code, such as the following:
- subroutine calling convention? like: 1 byte arg -> pass in A, 2 bytes -> pass in A+Y, return value likewise.
- can such parameter passing to subroutines be optimized to avoid copying?
- add a compiler option to not include variable initialization code (useful if the program is expected to run only once, such as a game)
  the program will then rely solely on the values as they are in memory at the time of program startup.
- Also some library routines and code patterns could perhaps be optimized further
- more optimizations on the language AST level
- more optimizations on the final assembly source level
- note: subroutine inlining is abandoned because of problems referencing non-local stuff. Can't move everything around.


Eval stack redesign? (lot of work)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

The eval stack is now a split lsb/msb stack using X as the stackpointer.
Is it easier/faster to just use a single page unsplit stack?
It could then even be moved into the zeropage to reduce code size and slowness.

Or just move the LSB portion into a slab of the zeropage.

Allocate a fixed word in ZP that is the Top Of Stack value so we can always operate on TOS directly
without having to index with X into the eval stack all the time?
This could GREATLY improve code size and speed for operations that work on just a single value.


Bug Fixing
^^^^^^^^^^
Ofcourse there are always bugs to fix ;)


Misc
^^^^

Several ideas were discussed on my reddit post
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/alhj59/creating_a_programming_language_and_cross/