mirror of
https://github.com/irmen/prog8.git
synced 2025-07-24 05:24:17 +00:00
90 lines
6.5 KiB
ReStructuredText
90 lines
6.5 KiB
ReStructuredText
TODO
|
|
====
|
|
|
|
make compiler quiet when running .p8ir files via -vm (also add -quiet flag to suppress output on regular operation?)
|
|
|
|
romable: check library files for routines that are not yet romable and add "TODO: Romable" comment
|
|
romable: fix as many of those issues as possible to improve romability of library code
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Things and Ideas
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
- romable: should we have a way to explicitly set the memory address for the BSS area (instead of only the highram bank number on X16, allow a memory address too for the -varshigh option?)
|
|
- Kotlin: can we use inline value classes in certain spots?
|
|
- add float support to the configurable compiler targets
|
|
- Improve the SublimeText syntax file for prog8, you can also install this for 'bat': https://github.com/sharkdp/bat?tab=readme-ov-file#adding-new-syntaxes--language-definitions
|
|
- Change scoping rules for qualified symbols so that they don't always start from the root but behave like other programming languages (look in local scope first)
|
|
- something to reduce the need to use fully qualified names all the time. 'with' ? Or 'using <prefix>'?
|
|
- Improve register load order in subroutine call args assignments:
|
|
in certain situations (need examples!), the "wrong" order of evaluation of function call arguments is done which results
|
|
in overwriting registers that already got their value, which requires a lot of stack juggling (especially on plain 6502 cpu!)
|
|
Maybe this routine can be made more intelligent. See usesOtherRegistersWhileEvaluating() and argumentsViaRegisters().
|
|
- Does it make codegen easier if everything is an expression? Start with the PtProgram ast classes, change statements to expressions that have (new) VOID data type
|
|
- Can we support signed % (remainder) somehow?
|
|
- Multidimensional arrays and chained indexing, purely as syntactic sugar over regular arrays. Probaby only useful if we have typed pointers.
|
|
- make a form of "manual generics" possible like: varsub routine(T arg)->T where T is expanded to a specific type
|
|
(this is already done hardcoded for several of the builtin functions)
|
|
- [much work:] more support for (64tass) SEGMENTS in the prog8 syntax itself?
|
|
- Zig-like try-based error handling where the V flag could indicate error condition? and/or BRK to jump into monitor on failure? (has to set BRK vector for that) But the V flag is also set on certain normal instructions
|
|
|
|
|
|
IR/VM
|
|
-----
|
|
- getting it in shape for code generation...: the IR file should be able to encode every detail about a prog8 program (the VM doesn't have to actually be able to run all of it though!)
|
|
- fix call() return value handling
|
|
- proper code gen for the CALLI instruction and that it (optionally) returns a word value that needs to be assigned to a reg
|
|
- implement fast code paths for TODO("inplace split....
|
|
- implement more TODOs in AssignmentGen
|
|
- sometimes source lines end up missing in the output p8ir, for example the first assignment is gone in:
|
|
sub start() {
|
|
cx16.r0L = cx16.r1 as ubyte
|
|
cx16.r0sL = cx16.r1s as byte }
|
|
- do something with the 'split' tag on split word arrays
|
|
- add more optimizations in IRPeepholeOptimizer
|
|
- idea: (but LLVM IR simply keeps the variables, so not a good idea then?...): replace all scalar variables by an allocated register. Keep a table of the variable to register mapping (including the datatype)
|
|
global initialization values are simply a list of LOAD instructions.
|
|
Variables replaced include all subroutine parameters! So the only variables that remain as variables are arrays and strings.
|
|
- the @split arrays are currently also split in _lsb/_msb arrays in the IR, and operations take multiple (byte) instructions that may lead to verbose and slow operation and machine code generation down the line.
|
|
maybe another representation is needed once actual codegeneration is done from the IR...?
|
|
- ExpressionCodeResult: get rid of the separation between single result register and multiple result registers? maybe not, this requires hundreds of lines to change
|
|
|
|
|
|
Libraries
|
|
---------
|
|
- Add split-word array sorting routines to sorting module?
|
|
- See if the raster interrupt handler on the C64 can be tweaked to be a more stable raster irq
|
|
- pet32 target: make syslib more complete (missing kernal routines)?
|
|
- need help with: PET disk routines (OPEN, SETLFS etc are not exposed as kernal calls)
|
|
- c128 target: make syslib more complete (missing kernal routines)?
|
|
- VM: implement the last diskio support (file listings)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optimizations
|
|
-------------
|
|
|
|
- Sorting module gnomesort_uw could be optimized more by fully rewriting it in asm? Shellshort seems consistently faster even if most of the words are already sorted.
|
|
- Compare output of some Oscar64 samples to what prog8 does for the equivalent code (see https://github.com/drmortalwombat/OscarTutorials/tree/main and https://github.com/drmortalwombat/oscar64/tree/main/samples)
|
|
- Multi-value returns of normal subroutines: Can FAC then be used for floats as well again? Those are now not supported for multi-value returns.
|
|
- Optimize the IfExpression code generation to be more like regular if-else code. (both 6502 and IR) search for "TODO don't store condition as expression"
|
|
- VariableAllocator: can we think of a smarter strategy for allocating variables into zeropage, rather than first-come-first-served?
|
|
for instance, vars used inside loops first, then loopvars, then uwords used as pointers (or these first??), then the rest
|
|
- various optimizers skip stuff if compTarget.name==VMTarget.NAME. Once 6502-codegen is done from IR code,
|
|
those checks should probably be removed, or be made permanent
|
|
|
|
|
|
STRUCTS?
|
|
--------
|
|
|
|
- declare struct *type*, or directly declare the variable itself? Problem with the latter is: you cannot easily define multiple variables of the same struct type.
|
|
- can contain only numeric types (byte,word,float) - no nested structs, no reference types (strings, arrays) inside structs
|
|
- only as a reference type (uword pointer). This removes a lot of the problems related to introducing a variable length value type.
|
|
- arrays of struct is just an array of uword pointers. Can even be @split?
|
|
- need to introduce typed pointer datatype in prog8
|
|
- STR remains the type for a string literal (so we can keep doing register-indexed addressing directly on it)
|
|
- ARRAY remains the type for an array literal (so we can keep doing register-indexed addressing directly on it)
|
|
- we probably need to have a STRBYREF and ARRAYBYREF if we deal with a pointer to a string / array (such as when passing it to a function)
|
|
the subtype of those should include the declared element type and the declared length of the string / array
|