They will now return 0 and set errno to EINVAL if an invalid base value (anything other than 0 or 2..36) is detected.
This behavior is required by POSIX. It's not required by the C standards (which leave the behavior in this case undefined), but it seems reasonable to do.
Previously, they often did not do this. Now they do, as follows:
If there was a sequence of the expected numeric form, then they fully parse that sequence and give a pointer past the end of it, even if the number was out of range. If there was not a sequence of the expected form, they give the starting pointer that they were passed in.
This stemmed from its calling strtoul internally, causing it to accept extra while space and/or + signs. The fix is to have an alternate entry point for strtoul that skips that processing.
The issue was introduced in commit 6e9790667.
errno is now set to EINVAL in this case. (This is not required by the C standards, but is consistent with various other implementations.)
This fixes the cases in #23 related to strtol() and strtoul().
In other bases, the 'x' either ends parsing of the number string or (in base 34 and larger) is a digit.
Also, ensure only ASCII characters (with high bit clear) are accepted in all situations.
They could previously give the wrong sign on the remainder in certain cases where one or both of the arguments were negative, because they were using the wrong condition to decide whether to negate it.
This exits the programs without calling atexit functions and possibly without doing other clean-up operations. In ORCA/C, it is functionally identical to _exit().
Previously, it just ran an Execute shell call with NULL as the command-line pointer.
The fix is to still call Execute, but with an empty string as the command line, and then check if the call gave an error. If running under plain GS/OS, this gives an error for an unknown system call, whereas both ORCA/APW and GNO shells will return with no error in this case. (Golden Gate doesn't implement the Execute shell call, so it also gives an error and will report no command processor available.)
This fixes issue #25.
